NASA has identified an asteroid roughly comparable in size to the Empire State Building, traveling through space at about 20,000 miles per hour, and projected to make a close pass by Earth. The object is large enough to command public attention, yet it is also a case study in how modern planetary defense systems quietly track and characterize such visitors long before they pose any realistic danger.
I want to unpack what scientists actually know about this asteroid, how they measure its speed and size, and why a dramatic comparison to a New York skyscraper does not automatically translate into a looming catastrophe. The story is less about a single rock in space and more about the maturing global effort to find, catalog, and, if ever necessary, deflect hazardous objects.
How NASA spotted the skyscraper-scale asteroid
The starting point for any near-Earth asteroid story is the detection itself, and in this case the discovery fits into a well established survey pipeline. NASA’s planetary defense program relies on a network of ground-based telescopes that scan the sky night after night, looking for faint points of light that shift position against the background of stars. When an object moves in a way that suggests it is relatively close to Earth, automated software flags it for follow up, and additional observations refine its orbit and basic properties such as brightness and apparent motion, which in turn inform estimates of size and speed based on standard asteroid models and reflectivity assumptions documented in near-Earth object surveys.
Once the initial track is established, NASA’s Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) takes over the orbit calculations, using decades of astrodynamics practice to project where the asteroid has been and where it is going. The reported speed of about 20,000 miles per hour is consistent with typical relative velocities for near-Earth asteroids, which CNEOS notes often range from several kilometers per second upward, depending on the geometry of the encounter and the object’s original orbit around the Sun as described in its orbital dynamics summaries. That process, repeated thousands of times for different objects, is what allows NASA to speak with confidence about close approaches years in advance rather than reacting in real time to a surprise visitor.
What “Empire State Building-size” really means in space terms
Comparing an asteroid to the Empire State Building is a vivid way to convey scale, but scientifically it rests on a more technical estimate of the object’s diameter and reflectivity. Astronomers infer size from how bright the asteroid appears at a known distance, combined with assumptions about its albedo, or how much sunlight its surface reflects, which are standard parameters in near-Earth object characterization. A skyscraper-scale asteroid typically falls into the hundreds of meters across, large enough to cause regional damage if it ever struck Earth, yet still far smaller than the multi-kilometer bodies associated with mass extinction events in the geological record.
In planetary defense planning, NASA and its partners categorize threats by size bands, because the potential impact energy scales roughly with the cube of the diameter. Objects tens of meters across, like the one that exploded over Chelyabinsk, Russia, in 2013, can shatter windows and injure people locally, while those in the hundreds of meters range rise to the level of serious regional hazard. That is why the agency’s survey goals, outlined in its planetary defense overview, prioritize finding the vast majority of near-Earth asteroids larger than 140 meters, a category that comfortably includes anything likened to the Empire State Building.
How scientists calculate a 20,000 mph space rock
The quoted speed of about 20,000 miles per hour might sound extraordinary, but in orbital mechanics it is a straightforward consequence of gravity and geometry. Near-Earth asteroids travel around the Sun on elongated paths, and their relative speed with respect to Earth depends on whether they are catching up from behind, crossing our orbit at a steep angle, or meeting us head on. CNEOS explains in its technical notes on near-Earth object orbits that typical encounter velocities fall in the range of several to tens of kilometers per second, which translates to tens of thousands of miles per hour when expressed in everyday units.
To derive that number for a specific asteroid, astronomers fit an orbit to multiple nights of positional data, then compute the object’s velocity vector at the time of closest approach relative to Earth’s own motion. The result is not a guess but a product of well tested gravitational models that have been validated against spacecraft navigation and decades of asteroid tracking. When NASA reports a speed like 20,000 miles per hour, it is summarizing a more precise calculation that might be given in kilometers per second in internal tables, consistent with the conventions used in its orbit determination work.
Why a close pass is not the same as a collision threat
Headlines about a large asteroid “approaching Earth” can easily blur the distinction between a close pass and an actual impact risk, but the difference is central to how NASA communicates hazard. A close approach simply means the object will pass within a certain distance of our planet, often measured in lunar distances, while still remaining far outside the atmosphere. CNEOS maintains a public database of close approaches that lists thousands of such flybys, many of them involving objects hundreds of meters across, and the vast majority pose no realistic chance of collision because their trajectories miss Earth by wide margins.
When there is any nonzero impact probability, even if it is extremely small, the asteroid appears on the CNEOS Sentry risk table, which tracks potential future encounters over the next century based on current orbital uncertainties. Most newly discovered objects are quickly removed from that list as additional observations tighten their orbits and rule out impacts. The skyscraper-scale asteroid in question fits into this broader pattern, where a dramatic size and speed coexist with a trajectory that, according to the same methods used for all cataloged near-Earth objects, keeps it safely in the category of a flyby rather than a looming strike.
How this asteroid fits into NASA’s broader planetary defense strategy
To understand why NASA can speak with authority about a single large asteroid, I look at the larger architecture built around planetary defense. The agency’s dedicated Planetary Defense Coordination Office oversees the search for near-Earth objects, the assessment of their orbits, and the planning of any potential mitigation missions, as laid out in its program overview. That office coordinates with observatories worldwide, shares data with international partners, and ensures that discoveries like this Empire State Building-scale rock are quickly folded into a global catalog rather than treated as isolated curiosities.
Beyond tracking, NASA has moved into active testing of deflection techniques, most notably with the Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission, which deliberately impacted the moonlet Dimorphos to measure how much its orbit changed. The success of that experiment, documented in the agency’s DART mission overview, provides a proof of concept that kinetic impactors can alter the path of a small body if given sufficient warning time. In that context, each newly characterized large asteroid is not just a potential hazard but also a data point that refines models of composition, structure, and response to any future deflection attempt.
What we know about the asteroid’s orbit and future passes
Once an asteroid’s orbit is pinned down, scientists can project its path years or even centuries into the future, which is how they can say with confidence whether it poses any long term threat. CNEOS describes how it uses high precision numerical integration to propagate orbits forward and backward in time, accounting for gravitational influences from the major planets and, when necessary, smaller perturbations, as detailed in its technical background. For a large object like this one, the observational coverage is typically robust enough that the uncertainty region shrinks quickly, turning a fuzzy initial arc into a well constrained trajectory.
Those calculations feed into public tools such as the close-approach database and the Sentry monitoring system, which list not only the upcoming flyby but also any subsequent encounters that might bring the asteroid near Earth’s orbit again. In practice, many near-Earth asteroids settle into patterns where they make periodic passes at safe distances, and the key question is whether any of those future alignments could intersect our planet. For the Empire State Building-scale object at 20,000 miles per hour, the available orbital solutions place its known approaches firmly in the non-impact category, illustrating how routine such events have become in the era of systematic sky surveys.
How this object compares to past close shaves and real impacts
Putting this asteroid in historical context helps separate cinematic fear from realistic risk. The most famous modern impact, the Chelyabinsk event, involved an object estimated at about 20 meters across that exploded in the atmosphere, injuring more than 1,000 people primarily through broken glass. That incident, which NASA has analyzed extensively in its planetary defense materials, underscored how even relatively small bodies can cause significant local damage if they arrive unannounced. By contrast, a skyscraper-scale asteroid carries far more energy, but the key difference here is that it has been detected, tracked, and found to be on a passing trajectory rather than a collision course.
On the other end of the spectrum, scientists often reference the Chicxulub impactor, estimated at around 10 kilometers in diameter, as the benchmark for global catastrophe. NASA’s hazard assessments, summarized in its program goals, emphasize that surveys have already found the vast majority of objects in that size range, and none are known to be on an Earth-crossing path in the foreseeable future. The Empire State Building-size asteroid sits between these extremes: large enough to be taken seriously in planning scenarios, yet also an example of how the current detection infrastructure is doing exactly what it was designed to do by spotting and characterizing such bodies well in advance.
Why NASA keeps cataloging even non-threatening asteroids
Even when an asteroid is quickly ruled out as an impact threat, NASA continues to refine its orbit and physical properties, because each object enriches the broader scientific and defensive picture. The agency’s planetary defense roadmap, outlined in its official overview, sets explicit targets for discovering and tracking a high percentage of near-Earth objects above certain size thresholds. Meeting those goals requires not only initial detections but also follow up observations that lock in orbits and reduce uncertainties, which is why a large, safely passing asteroid remains a priority target for telescopes long after the immediate news cycle has moved on.
Beyond hazard assessment, these detailed catalogs support research into asteroid composition, rotation, and surface properties, all of which feed back into deflection planning. The DART mission, for example, showed how the response of Dimorphos to a kinetic impact depended on its internal structure, a result highlighted in the mission’s technical summary. By building a statistically rich sample of objects across different size ranges, including those comparable to the Empire State Building, scientists can better predict how any future mitigation attempt might play out, turning each non-threatening flyby into a learning opportunity.
What this flyby tells us about public risk and preparedness
From a public safety perspective, the key takeaway from a large asteroid passing at 20,000 miles per hour without incident is that the system is working as intended. NASA’s combination of sky surveys, orbit modeling, and risk monitoring through tools like the Sentry system allows officials to distinguish between routine close approaches and genuine hazards, which in turn informs how governments and emergency planners allocate attention and resources. The fact that a skyscraper-scale object can be tracked, analyzed, and publicly discussed as a non-threat reflects a level of preparedness that did not exist a few decades ago.
At the same time, each high profile asteroid story is a reminder that planetary defense is an ongoing effort rather than a solved problem. NASA’s own planning documents, including its program overview, acknowledge that surveys are still working toward complete coverage of mid-sized near-Earth objects, and that further investments in telescopes and follow up infrastructure are needed to close remaining gaps. In that light, the Empire State Building-size asteroid is both a reassurance and a prompt: a reassurance that known large bodies are being tracked with increasing precision, and a prompt to sustain the scientific and technical work required to ensure that any future object on a less benign trajectory is discovered with enough warning to act.
More from MorningOverview