The United States is moving from concept art to hardware in its push for a permanent foothold on the Moon, and nuclear power is at the center of that strategy. NASA and the Department of Energy are now formally partnered to design and deploy a small fission reactor on the lunar surface by 2030, a system meant to run for years and keep a future base powered through the two-week lunar night. The plan signals that Washington intends to treat reliable energy as the enabling infrastructure for long-term human presence beyond Earth.
The project is framed not as a one-off experiment but as the backbone of a sustained lunar economy, with lessons that could carry humans onward to Mars. It also reflects a broader national space policy under President Donald Trump that explicitly ties deep-space exploration to advanced nuclear technology, from power systems to potential propulsion.
From memorandum to mission: how NASA and DOE locked in
NASA and the Department of Energy have worked together on space power before, but earlier this year they elevated that cooperation with a formal memorandum of understanding that puts a lunar fission reactor on a clear timeline. On 13 Jan, NASA and the US Department of Energy, referred to as DOE, signed an agreement that commits both sides to develop a lunar surface power system capable of operating through the 14-day lunar night, a period when solar arrays sit in darkness and batteries alone are not enough, as detailed in the memorandum. The Department of Energy and National Aeronautics and Space Administration, identified together as The Department of Energy and National Aeronautics and Space Administration, then followed up with programmatic planning that aims to have hardware ready to launch by the first quarter of the 2030 fiscal year, according to partnership documents.
At NASA Headquarters, the partnership has been framed as a strategic shift rather than a niche technology project. U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright and NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman met at the Departme of Energy complex in Washington to underscore that the agencies see nuclear power as essential to a sustainable presence on the Moon and beyond, a point NASA highlighted in its headquarters announcement. The same release makes clear that the agencies’ joint effort is not limited to the Moon, describing the fission surface power work as a stepping stone that will also support eventual Mars exploration plans, a linkage spelled out in the agencies’ joint effort.
What the lunar reactor will actually do
NASA and DOE are not talking about a giant power plant but a compact fission surface power system sized for an early base. The agencies anticipate deploying a reactor that can produce safe, efficient and plentiful electrical power on the Moon, enough to run habitats, life support, communications, in-situ resource utilisation systems and surface mobility, according to their shared technical outline. NASA has said the unit will be capable of operating for years without the need to refuel, a critical feature when resupply flights are expensive and infrequent, a capability it highlighted when it committed to a nuclear reactor on the Moon by 2030 in coverage of the Artemis II program and its nuclear energy plans.
Officials have also begun to quantify what that means in terrestrial terms. Jan statements from NASA indicate that the fission system is being designed to deliver on the order of tens of kilowatts, enough to power about 80 homes on Earth, a comparison that surfaced when Jan DOE leaders said they were proud to work with NASA and the commercial space industry on what they called one of the greatest technical challenges of their time, as described in agency briefings. NASA has stressed that the reactor will be designed to run autonomously in the harsh lunar environment, with shielding and siting strategies that keep radiation away from crewed areas while still delivering steady power, a concept it has grouped under the broader label of Reactors for space.
Why nuclear, and why now
The choice of nuclear fission over more solar panels is rooted in the physics of the Moon itself. Near the equator, the lunar night lasts roughly 14 Earth days, a stretch when temperatures plunge and sunlight disappears, which makes continuous solar power extremely difficult without enormous batteries or fuel cells, a limitation that the Jan MOU between DOE and NASA explicitly calls out as a driver for the new system, according to technical analyses. By contrast, a compact fission reactor can provide constant output regardless of lighting conditions, which is why NASA and DOE describe their fission surface power, or FSP, system as the backbone of a permanent base rather than a backup generator, a framing that appears in their joint FSP planning.
There is also a geopolitical clock ticking. Russia has publicly said it plans to build a nuclear power plant on the Moon by around 2036 to support its own lunar programme and a joint research base, a target that has sharpened the sense of competition in Washington, as noted in reports that the USA is planning to team up its space and energy agencies to build a nuclear station on the Moon. Under President Trump’s national space policy, NASA has been encouraged to harness nuclear power as a strategic asset, a stance that NASA itself has echoed by saying that a sustainable future in deep space requires harnessing nuclear power, a line that appears in both its headquarters messaging and in coverage of its lunar reactor plans.
How the reactor fits into Artemis and a permanent base
The nuclear project is tightly woven into NASA’s Artemis architecture, which aims to return humans to the Moon and then stay. As NASA prepares Artemis II, its first crewed mission around the Moon, the agency has been clear that later Artemis landings will depend on robust surface power to support habitats, rovers and science stations that can operate continuously rather than in short bursts, a linkage it has drawn in public updates on Artemis II and its commitment to a reactor by 2030. NASA and DOE have said the fission surface power unit will be deployed to a fixed location on the lunar surface, where it can feed microgrids that distribute electricity to multiple modules and vehicles, a concept that appears in their surface power planning.
From my perspective, the most consequential aspect is that NASA and DOE are designing this as a template, not a one-off. The agencies have said that the same basic reactor architecture could be adapted for Mars, where sunlight is weaker and dust storms can last for weeks, a point they make when describing their joint effort as a bridge from the Moon to Mars in official program summaries. If the first unit performs as advertised, it could become the standard power plant for off-world outposts, much as standardized solar farms and gas turbines underpin remote infrastructure on Earth.
Technical hurdles and the road to 2030
For all the optimism, the path to a working lunar reactor is not straightforward. NASA’s and the DOE’s joint ambitions for a lunar fission surface power system have already been characterized by delays and uncertainty, with shifting budgets and evolving requirements slowing earlier studies, a history that the American Nuclear Society recounted when it noted that the agencies had to renew and solidify their collaboration on a lunar surface reactor. Engineers must design a system that can survive launch vibrations, land on the Moon, deploy safely away from crew, reject heat in a vacuum and operate with minimal maintenance, all while meeting strict safety rules at every stage from factory to launch pad.
More from Morning Overview