Elon Musk is sketching a future in which artificial intelligence can handle almost every task society needs, turning most traditional skills into relics and making work itself optional. Yet in the same breath, he is telling his own children that college is not mandatory, only a choice that might still matter for personal growth rather than employability.
That tension, between a world where machines do nearly everything and an education system still built around job preparation, is the fault line running through Musk’s latest comments on AI, work and university life. It is also a preview of the uncomfortable questions the rest of us will have to answer long before his vision of a “post‑work” society arrives.
AI as a “supersonic tsunami” for human skills
I see Musk’s core claim as stark: artificial intelligence is not just another productivity tool, it is a force that will wash away most of the skills people currently trade for a paycheck. He has described AI as a “supersonic tsunami” for the workforce, a phrase that captures both the speed and scale of the disruption he expects, with systems that can perform tasks across industries faster and more cheaply than human workers can manage.
In Musk’s telling, this wave will not be limited to factory lines or call centers but will reach into knowledge work, creative fields and even technical roles that once felt insulated from automation. He has argued that in a relatively benign scenario, AI could make wealth accessible to virtually everyone, a shift he links to the idea of a kind of universal high income that decouples living standards from individual earning power.
Musk’s prediction: most skills obsolete within two decades
When Musk talks about skills becoming obsolete, he is not speaking in vague, distant terms. He has said his prediction is that in less than 20 years, AI will be able to do nearly everything society needs, a timeline that would put today’s elementary school students into a labor market where their human capabilities are often optional rather than essential. In that scenario, the value of learning specific job skills erodes quickly, because machines can replicate or surpass them at scale.
He has framed this as a near inevitability rather than a speculative bet, arguing that the trajectory of current systems points toward AI that can understand, generate and execute complex tasks across domains. In one recent discussion, he put it bluntly, saying that most job skills will be obsolete once AI reaches that level, which he expects within that sub‑20‑year window.
From four‑day week to no work at all
Musk is not content to argue that AI will trim work hours at the margins, he is suggesting that work itself could become unnecessary for survival. He has contrasted the popular push for a four‑day workweek with his belief that people will not have to work at all, presenting a future where employment is a personal choice rather than an economic requirement. In that world, jobs look more like hobbies, pursued for meaning, status or curiosity rather than to pay rent.
That framing is not just rhetorical flourish. Musk has said he expects this shift to arrive in less than 20 years, the same horizon he uses for AI’s takeover of most skills, and he has linked it to the idea that advanced systems and robots will handle production, services and much of the cognitive labor that underpins today’s economy. In one interview, he went so far as to say people would work only if they wanted to, treating employment as a personal choice, like a hobby rather than a necessity.
A “post‑work society” and the future of education
If Musk is right about a post‑work society, the logic of education has to change just as radically as the labor market. He has spoken about a future where AI and robots drive most economic activity, leaving humans to focus on creativity, exploration and social connection. In that context, the traditional promise that schooling leads to a stable career starts to look outdated, because the careers themselves are no longer the anchor of adult life.
In a recent conversation about the future of education, Musk tied this vision directly to AI, describing how a world of abundant machine labor would force schools and universities to rethink what they teach and why. Rather than drilling students on skills that machines will soon master, he suggested that learning should emphasize curiosity, problem‑solving and the ability to work with intelligent systems, a shift that aligns with his broader view of a post‑work society driven by AI and robots.
Why Musk still sees value in college
Despite his insistence that AI will make most skills redundant, Musk has not written off higher education entirely. He has said that college can still be useful, but for reasons that have little to do with job training, pointing instead to the social experience, the chance to grow up away from home and the exposure to a broad range of ideas. In his view, the campus is less a pipeline to employment and more a structured environment for personal development.
That distinction is clearest in how he talks about his own children. Musk has said his kids can go to college if they want to, but he does not treat a degree as a requirement for success in an AI‑saturated world. He has framed university as an option for those who value the social and intellectual journey, not as a guarantee of economic security, a stance he has repeated while explaining that AI will be able to do nearly everything society needs even as college remains “useful” in narrower ways.
College as optional for Musk’s own family
Musk’s comments about his children are more than a personal aside, they are a test case for how someone who expects AI to dominate the job market thinks about education at home. He has been explicit that his kids are free to choose whether to attend university, signaling that he does not see a degree as essential even for people who will live through the transition he is predicting. That attitude undercuts the long‑standing assumption that skipping college is inherently risky.
At the same time, he has not discouraged them from going if they find value in the experience, especially in the friendships, independence and broad learning that campus life can offer. In one account of his remarks, Musk is quoted explaining that his kids can still go to college if they want, even as he predicts that AI will make most skills obsolete, a juxtaposition that captures his belief that education’s value is shifting from economic necessity to personal choice.
What “skills” mean when AI does the work
When Musk says most skills will be obsolete, he is not arguing that human abilities disappear, only that the market will not pay for them in the same way. In a world where AI can code, draft legal documents, design products and even generate art, the premium on narrowly defined technical skills shrinks. The skills that remain scarce are the ones that are hardest to formalize: taste, judgment, leadership, the ability to set goals and decide what problems are worth solving in the first place.
That shift has direct implications for how people think about their own development. If AI can master the content of a computer science curriculum or an accounting program, then the differentiator becomes how individuals use those tools, how they collaborate with others and how they navigate complex social and ethical trade‑offs. Musk’s repeated warnings about a supersonic tsunami in the workforce are, in that sense, also a prompt to rethink what counts as a durable human skill.
The psychological shock of a world without necessary work
Even if Musk’s timeline proves accurate, the hardest part of a post‑work society may not be economic but psychological. For generations, identity has been tightly bound to occupation, with “what do you do?” serving as a default question in social life. Musk has acknowledged that if AI and robots handle most tasks, people will need new ways to find meaning, status and community that do not depend on job titles.
He has suggested that humans might spend more time on creative pursuits, scientific exploration or social projects once they are freed from the need to earn a living, but he has also hinted that this transition will not be simple. The idea that people will work only if they want to, treating jobs as hobbies, assumes a cultural shift as profound as the technological one, a shift that his comments about forgetting the four‑day workweek and moving toward no required work at all only begin to describe.
How education systems might adapt to Musk’s timeline
If AI can do nearly everything society needs in less than 20 years, education systems that take a decade or more to reform are already behind. Musk’s comments imply that schools and universities should pivot away from training students for specific roles that may vanish and toward building adaptability, ethical reasoning and fluency with AI tools. That could mean more project‑based learning, more interdisciplinary programs and more emphasis on how to ask the right questions of intelligent systems.
He has also pointed to the need for education to prepare people for a world where their main job is to be interesting, to bring something uniquely human to interactions with machines and with each other. In his conversations about a future shaped by AI and robots, Musk has framed learning less as a ladder to employment and more as a lifelong process of exploration, a stance that fits with his view that college is optional but curiosity is not.
More from MorningOverview
