Elon Musk has ignited a fresh storm over the future of medicine by telling students that going to medical school is “pointless” because AI-powered robots will outperform human doctors within three years. His prediction that surgical humanoids will soon handle operations at scale has collided with anxieties about student debt, workforce shortages, and the limits of automation in care. I want to unpack what Musk is actually claiming, what his own technology can and cannot yet do, and how seriously future doctors should take a three-year countdown on their careers.
Musk’s three-year bet on robot surgeons
At the center of the controversy is a blunt claim: Musk says that within roughly three years, humanoid robots will be able to carry out surgery so effectively that traditional medical training will no longer be worth the investment. In a widely shared exchange, he told an interviewer, “Don’t go into medical school,” and when the Interviewer pushed back with “Really,” he doubled down with a terse “Yes,” framing the entire path as “pointless” in light of rapid AI progress linked to his own projects. That prediction is tied directly to the idea that robots like Tesla’s Optimus will be capable of performing operations at scale, a vision he has promoted while describing himself as The Tesla and SpaceX CEO and positioning Tesla as a future healthcare player through Optimus.
Earlier this month, Musk reiterated to students that they should “Don’t go to med school,” arguing that Tesla’s Optimus robots could replace surgeons and that AI is “actually going” to transform the operating room far faster than institutions can adapt. In parallel, he has framed medical school as “pointless” because, in his view, AI systems will soon outlearn and outmaneuver human clinicians in diagnosis and treatment planning, a stance he has repeated in multiple appearances and social clips. When I look across those remarks, from his jaw-dropping prediction shared on video to his comments amplified in education and careers coverage, the throughline is clear: he is not just forecasting change, he is actively discouraging young people from entering medicine on the assumption that Optimus and similar systems will be operating theaters within three years at scale.
How Musk links AI, Optimus and “pointless” med school
Musk’s argument rests on a specific reading of exponential progress in AI and robotics. He has said that it is the exponential growth of AI capabilities that makes traditional medical education, and even higher education in general, increasingly obsolete, because no human can keep up with the pace at which machine learning systems absorb and update medical knowledge. In his telling, AI-driven robotics, machine learning and automation will soon allow surgical robots to outperform human surgeons in precision, speed and consistency, turning human doctors into a choice rather than a need. That logic underpins his claim that medical school will soon be “meaningless to go to,” a phrase that has circulated widely since it was reported in detail in coverage of his remarks.
He has also tied this vision directly to Tesla’s Optimus, presenting the humanoid robot as a near-future surgical assistant or even primary operator. In one student event, Musk said robots would replace surgeons and suggested that Optimus could handle delicate procedures once paired with advanced AI, a claim echoed in social clips that show him insisting that robotic surgery will be routine within three years. Commentators summarizing his stance note that he sees AI-powered robots as able to outperform human doctors in diagnosis and treatment, not just in the mechanical act of cutting and suturing. When I read accounts that describe how Musk said medical school would soon be pointless and that within three years robots would make human surgeons a choice, not a need, I see a consistent narrative across posts shared by Musk watchers and detailed explainers that link his comments to the broader future of medicine.
What his own tech can actually do today
For all the confidence of Musk’s timeline, his own companies’ medical track record is still at a very early stage. Tesla’s Optimus is a humanoid robot that has been shown walking, lifting and performing basic tasks, but there is no public evidence that it has performed any clinical procedure, let alone complex surgery, in a real hospital environment. Analyses of his remarks point out that while he talks about Optimus handling operations within three years at scale, the current generation of surgical robotics in use, such as the da Vinci system, is still teleoperated by human surgeons and tightly regulated. When I compare that reality with Musk’s suggestion that Optimus will be replacing surgeons outright, as described in detailed education and careers reporting on Optimus, the gap between aspiration and deployment looks substantial.
Musk’s broader health-tech portfolio underscores that tension. Neuralink, his brain-implant company, has only recently begun human trials, and even its most optimistic scenarios focus on restoring function for people with paralysis rather than general surgery. At the same time, Musk has been talking about humans being “pre-programmed to die” and longevity being “extremely solvable,” framing the future of medicine as one where AI and robotics blur the boundaries between healthcare and life extension. That rhetoric, captured in detailed reporting on his comments about the future of medicine, helps explain why he is so quick to declare traditional pathways obsolete. Yet when I look at the actual deployment of AI in hospitals today, from radiology triage tools to sepsis alerts, it is clear that these systems are augmenting clinicians rather than replacing them, and they are doing so under strict regulatory oversight that no three-year roadmap can wish away.
Doctors, educators and patients push back
Medical professionals and educators have responded to Musk’s comments with a mix of alarm and skepticism. Many point out that medical school is not just about memorizing facts that AI could store more efficiently, but about learning clinical judgment, ethics and the ability to navigate uncertainty with real human beings. One widely shared Instagram post summarized the backlash by noting that “Medical school might be pointless” was Musk’s claim, but then asking whether anyone truly believes that the human touch is replaceable, especially in moments of vulnerability. Another clip highlighted that when asked if people should still become doctors, Elon Musk said no, then immediately followed with his three-year robot timeline, prompting viewers to question what happens to patient care if that forecast is even half right. I see that tension captured vividly in posts that quote how When Elon Musk dismisses the entire profession, he is not just speculating about technology, he is influencing real career decisions.
Patient advocates have also stressed that there are aspects of care AI cannot replicate, at least with any technology on the horizon. Building trust between a patient and a doctor, listening to fears, and navigating cultural and emotional contexts are all central to effective treatment and job satisfaction among healthcare professionals. Commentators responding to Musk’s remarks have argued that these relational dimensions are precisely what keep burnout at bay and make medicine more than a technical trade. One detailed analysis of his comments on medical school warned that even if AI eventually outperforms humans on some diagnostic tasks, there will remain a wide range of roles that demand a human touch, from primary care to complex counseling, a point underscored in posts that emphasize how Building trust is central to care. When I weigh those arguments against Musk’s sweeping dismissal, it is hard to see how a three-year robot horizon could erase the need for human clinicians in the messy reality of hospitals and clinics.
More from Morning Overview