The Moon has a reputation as a frozen, silent world, but a growing body of evidence suggests it is still shifting and straining deep below the surface. From long scarps that wrinkle the crust to fresh landslides on crater walls, scientists are now tracing a pattern of subtle but persistent activity that is literally cracking the lunar ground. The emerging picture is of a small world still cooling, still contracting and, in places, still threatening to shake itself hard enough to matter for future astronauts.
What looks like a single story about “the Moon cracking apart” actually blends several lines of research, from ancient fractures that nearly tore the body open to modern quakes that rattle boulders loose. I see a clear throughline: the Moon’s crust is a palimpsest of stress, recording both the violent forces that shaped it billions of years ago and the quieter, ongoing tectonics that will shape how humans live and work there in the decades ahead.
From smooth seas to wrinkled crust
For generations, the dark lunar “seas” that we see with the naked eye looked like calm, solidified scars from an early era of lava flooding. Detailed mapping has overturned that simple picture, revealing that these vast basins, known as mare or MAR, are laced with low ridges and fault scarps where the surface has been pushed together. High resolution images show that Billions of years after the basins formed, the crust in these regions continued to deform as the interior cooled and shrank, leaving the Moon’s face subtly but unmistakably wrinkled.
Those compressional features are not just cosmetic. They are physical evidence that the Earth and the Moon have been locked in a long thermal evolution, with the smaller body losing heat faster and tightening like a drying apple. As the crust adjusts, it breaks along thrust faults that can extend for many kilometers, and some of those faults cut across relatively young impact craters. That crosscutting relationship tells me the deformation is not just a relic of ancient times but part of a geologic story that has continued into the recent past.
Ancient fractures that nearly tore the Moon apart
Not all lunar cracks are the product of slow contraction. Some of the most dramatic structures are long, trench-like depressions called grabens, where blocks of crust dropped between diverging faults. New oblique images have highlighted Unpublished graben systems that appear to record a time when the Moon was being pulled apart rather than squeezed, a sign of powerful internal or tidal forces early in its history. In some regions, the pattern of these troughs suggests the crust was close to failing on a global scale, a near “breakup” that left permanent scars but stopped short of splitting the body in two.
That deep past is also tied to how the Moon formed in the first place. According to the widely accepted Theories of the, the leading Origin model is the Giant Impact scenario, in which a Mars sized body collided with the early Earth and blasted material into orbit that later coalesced into the Moon. In that violent aftermath, molten rock, rapid cooling and shifting gravitational pulls would have generated intense stresses, helping to create the ancient grabens and rilles that still trace the surface. The fact that some of these extensional features look as if the Moon “broke apart” billions of years ago fits neatly into that high energy origin story.
A tectonic system that refuses to die
What surprises me most is not that the Moon once flexed and fractured, but that parts of its tectonic system appear to be active today. Work on unusual “bare spots” in the crust, where regolith has been stripped away, points to ongoing uplift along ridges tied to buried magmatic intrusions. Researchers including Schultz and Valantinas argue that these intrusions are still heaving upward, breaking the surface and exposing fresh material that would otherwise have been quickly covered by dust. Because bare spots on the Moon get buried relatively fast, the implication is that this cracking is geologically recent, possibly even ongoing.
Seismic evidence points in the same direction. Earlier work on shallow moonquakes already hinted that the crust is still adjusting, but newer analyses go further, tying specific boulder falls and landslides to past shaking. A study of the Taurus Littrow valley, the landing site of Apollo 17, used patterns of displaced rocks to reconstruct a history of quakes, a method described as Paleoseismic analysis. By reading these rockfalls the way geologists read faulted sediments on Earth, scientists concluded that the valley has experienced repeated, potentially strong quakes linked to nearby faults, underscoring that the Moon’s tectonic engine is not entirely shut down.
Fresh cracks, shrinking globe
High resolution imaging has transformed those abstract inferences into something more visceral. Detailed surveys show that the Moon’s surface hosts a network of small, bright scarps and faults that slice across craters and smooth plains alike. According to one synthesis, Many of these faults cut through recent impact craters, which means they must have formed after those craters and therefore represent relatively young movement. The Moon may look calm and unchanging to the naked eye, but in this view it is still creaking, with the crust adjusting in fits and starts as internal stresses build and release.
Those stresses are closely tied to the Moon’s slow global contraction. As the interior cools, the entire body shrinks slightly, forcing the brittle outer shell to accommodate the change by breaking. Earlier work on this process concluded that the New cracks in the crust are a natural consequence of that shrinkage, but the rate is so slow that the Moon will not be disappearing any time soon. Lead researcher Nicholas Schmerr has emphasized that this activity shows the Moon is still geologically alive and continues to contract, a point echoed in reports that the Moon’s surface shows signs of large cracks due to seismic activity. For future explorers, that means planning for a world where the ground itself can shift beneath a habitat or landing pad.
Myth, rilles and the limits of a cracking Moon
Whenever new images of dramatic lunar fractures circulate online, they tend to collide with older stories about the Moon literally splitting in two. One recurring example is Rima Ariadaeus, a long linear rille that cuts across the surface and has been photographed in detail by NASA during Apollo missions. That feature, and others like it, has been cited in religious and social media claims that the Moon was once physically divided, but careful analysis, including a poll of scientific evidence, finds no support for a literal splitting of the Moon. Instead, rilles such as Rima Ariadaeus are understood as surface expressions of volcanic or tectonic processes that, while impressive, do not represent a catastrophic bifurcation of the entire body.
That distinction matters, because it separates what the data actually show from the stories we project onto them. The Moon may have nearly torn itself apart in localized regions when ancient grabens formed, and it is clearly still cracking and quaking as it shrinks and its interior cools. Yet the overall structure remains intact, a single planetary mass that has weathered impacts, internal upheaval and tidal stresses without coming close to a clean break. As I weigh the latest imaging, seismic reconstructions of Taurus Littrow and the ongoing mapping of mare wrinkles, I see a world that is dynamic but not doomed, a place where subtle tectonics will shape landing site choices, infrastructure design and even astronaut sleep schedules, but not a world on the verge of shattering in the night sky.
More from Morning Overview