Image Credit: NASA - Public domain/Wiki Commons

The Moon is no longer just a backdrop for human exploration; it is being recast as a colossal energy bank. At the center of that shift is helium‑3, a rare isotope that could power fusion reactors, cool quantum computers, and reshape the global energy economy if even a fraction of the projected reserves can be tapped. The emerging numbers, from multi‑million‑ton resource estimates to quadrillion‑dollar valuations, explain why governments and startups are racing to turn lunar dust into the fuel of the future.

What was once a speculative idea is now hardening into business plans, hardware prototypes, and signed purchase agreements. As I trace the latest research and commercial moves, a clear pattern emerges: the Moon’s helium‑3 is being treated not as a distant dream but as a near‑term strategic asset, with concrete volumes, prices, and customers already on the table.

From obscure isotope to star energy candidate

Helium‑3 has been known to science since it was identified in 1939, but for decades it sat on the margins of physics, a laboratory curiosity rather than a cornerstone of energy policy. The isotope is unusual because its atoms are fermionic and become a superfluid at the ultra‑low temperature of 2.491 m K, a property that makes it invaluable for precision cryogenics and quantum research. Only later did fusion scientists realize that helium‑3 could, in principle, enable nuclear reactions that produce vast amounts of energy with far fewer radioactive byproducts than conventional fusion fuels.

On Earth, helium‑3 is vanishingly scarce, which is why it has historically been harvested in tiny quantities from nuclear weapons programs and specialized reactors. The Moon, by contrast, has spent billions of years exposed to the solar wind, which has steadily implanted helium‑3 into the upper layers of its soil. That contrast between terrestrial scarcity and lunar abundance is what has turned helium‑3 from an obscure isotope into a headline energy candidate, and it underpins the extraordinary resource estimates now driving a new phase of lunar competition.

The staggering scale of lunar helium‑3

When researchers and space agencies talk about the Moon as an energy bonanza, they are not speaking in metaphors. NASA analyses cited in recent reporting suggest there could be on the order of 3 million tons of helium‑3 embedded in the lunar regolith, a figure that has become a touchstone for advocates who argue that the NASA finds the energy of the future on the Moon in quantities large enough to power civilization for centuries. Even if only a fraction of that total proves technically and economically recoverable, the accessible resource would still dwarf anything available on Earth.

Some assessments go further and try to translate those tons into money. One widely cited calculation puts the notional value of helium‑3 in the lunar soil at 1.34 quadrillion dollars on the bright side of the Moon alone, assuming future markets for fusion fuel and advanced cryogenics materialize at scale. I see that number less as a precise forecast than as a signal of the order of magnitude involved: even conservative pricing assumptions yield valuations that make terrestrial oil and gas reserves look modest by comparison.

Why helium‑3 is worth $20 million a kilo

The economic logic behind lunar helium‑3 starts with its current and potential uses. On the fusion side, helium‑3 can be combined with deuterium in reactions that produce charged particles rather than a torrent of high‑energy neutrons, which in theory allows for more compact reactors and less long‑lived radioactive waste. On the quantum side, its superfluid behavior at 2.491 m K makes it an ideal coolant for the most sensitive qubits, where even tiny amounts of thermal noise can destroy information.

Because helium‑3 is so rare on Earth, its price in specialized markets is already extraordinary. Recent coverage of lunar mining startups pegs the prospective value of Moon‑sourced helium‑3 at around $20 million per kilogram, a figure that reflects both its scarcity and its potential to unlock cleaner fusion power. One analysis of a startup that aims to mine this $20 million‑per‑kilo moon fuel notes that the broader ecosystem of commercial lunar landers, including vehicles developed under NASA’s CLPS (Commercial Lunar Payload Services) program, is gradually maturing to the point where hauling such high‑value cargo becomes economically plausible.

NASA’s vision of “the most powerful energy source in history”

NASA has been central in reframing helium‑3 from a scientific curiosity into a strategic energy asset. Agency‑linked analyses describe helium‑3 on the Moon as potentially “the most powerful energy source in history,” emphasizing that the isotope has been deposited over billions of years by the solar wind and is now trapped in the upper layers of lunar soil. In that framing, the Moon is not just a stepping stone to Mars but a vast, slowly charged battery waiting to be tapped.

NASA’s interest is not purely theoretical. The agency’s work on commercial partnerships, including the CLPS framework referenced in analyses of the Commercial Lunar Payload Services ecosystem, is explicitly designed to create a logistics chain that private companies can use to test extraction technologies and eventually ship high‑value materials back to Earth. From my perspective, that combination of scientific framing and commercial enablement is what turns helium‑3 from a paper resource into a realistic pillar of future energy planning.

Interlune and the first real lunar fuel business model

Among the new players, Interlune stands out for treating helium‑3 as a near‑term commercial product rather than a distant fusion fuel. The company’s public materials describe a plan to harvest helium‑3 from lunar regolith and sell it initially into cryogenics and quantum computing markets, where even modest volumes can command high prices. On its own site, Interlune lays out a roadmap that starts with prospecting missions and scales up to industrial extraction, positioning itself as a first mover in what it frames as a new lunar resource industry.

That narrative is backed by concrete hardware and contracts. Renderings of the company’s harvester show a compact machine designed to scrape and heat lunar soil, using what one report describes as Digging and unique capture technology to separate helium‑3 from other gases. Another report details how Interlune has already unveiled a helium‑3 harvester prototype, a moon mining machine that signals the company’s intent to move quickly from concept to field‑ready equipment.

From concept to contracts: Bluefors, quantum cooling and early demand

The clearest sign that lunar helium‑3 is moving from hype to market is the emergence of actual purchase agreements. In September, the Helsinki‑based cryogenics firm Bluefors agreed to buy up to 1,000 liters of lunar helium‑3 annually from Interlune in a deal expected to be worth $300 million, with the gas earmarked to cool large quantum computers on Earth. One detailed account notes that Bluefors sees this as a way to secure a long‑term supply of a critical input as quantum hardware scales up.

Another analysis of the same agreement emphasizes that In September, the Helsinki firm Bluefors and Interlune effectively created the first forward market for lunar helium‑3, locking in a revenue stream that can help finance early missions. From my vantage point, this is a pivotal shift: instead of speculative talk about future fusion reactors, the initial business case is anchored in a concrete, high‑margin application that exists today, which makes the economics of early lunar mining far more credible.

Japan, China and a $4 trillion Moon race

States are not standing aside while startups carve up the lunar resource narrative. Japan has been particularly explicit about the economic stakes, with reporting describing how the country is moving in on a hidden $4 trillion energy source on the Moon as a space race against the US and China escalates. One account notes that Japan sees helium‑3 as a way to secure long‑term energy independence, while China is portrayed as a rival with its own lunar ambitions and plans for resource extraction.

Further reporting on the same theme highlights how a Japanese lunar exploration company, ispace, is working on technologies that could make it relatively easy to extract helium‑3 from the regolith. In that context, helium‑3 is framed as a fuel that can be used in a non‑destructive, sustainable way, with China and other powers eyeing the same prize. When I look at these moves alongside NASA’s plans and Interlune’s contracts, it is clear that helium‑3 is becoming a focal point of geopolitical competition, not just a scientific curiosity.

Mining the “Surface of the Moon”: hardware, risk and reward

Turning helium‑3 from a buried asset into a usable commodity requires heavy engineering on the lunar surface. Reports on early prototypes describe machines that can excavate regolith, heat it to release trapped gases, and then separate helium‑3 from more common species like helium‑4 and nitrogen. One detailed piece on a Mining Company Says It has Identified Hugely Valuable Material on the Surface of the Moon underscores that the same extraction chains designed for helium‑3 could also recover other high‑value volatiles, creating diversified revenue streams.

Visuals of these systems, including a Rendering of the Interlune Harvester, show compact, modular units that can be delivered by commercial landers and scaled up over time. From my perspective, the key risk is not whether the physics of helium‑3 extraction works, which is well understood, but whether the logistics of operating and maintaining such equipment in the harsh lunar environment can be managed at a cost that still leaves room for profit at even $20 million per kilogram. The early hardware suggests that companies are betting on incremental, robotic operations rather than giant, Apollo‑style infrastructure from day one.

Why the Moon, not Earth, holds the helium‑3 advantage

The strategic focus on the Moon only makes sense when you understand how unevenly helium‑3 is distributed in the Solar System. On Earth, the planet’s magnetic field deflects many charged particles from the Sun, which is why one report notes that While helium‑3 is extremely rare on Earth due to its magnetic shield, it is far more abundant on the Moon, where no such protection exists. Over geological timescales, that difference has allowed the lunar surface to soak up a steady drizzle of helium‑3 from the solar wind.

Scientific references also point out that helium‑3 occurs naturally in the atmospheres of the Solar System’s gas giants, but those environments are far more challenging to access than the lunar surface. From my vantage point, this makes the Moon a kind of Goldilocks zone for helium‑3: close enough to reach with current or near‑term rockets, rich enough in the resource to justify industrial activity, and free of the deep gravity wells that make gas giant mining a distant prospect. That combination is what turns the Moon into a uniquely attractive helium‑3 reservoir rather than just another exotic destination.

From fusion dreams to near‑term markets

For decades, helium‑3 was discussed mainly in the context of speculative fusion reactors that might not arrive for many years. What has changed is the recognition that there are profitable uses for helium‑3 long before fusion becomes commercially dominant. Quantum computing is the clearest example, with companies like Bluefors already committing to buy 1,000 liters of helium‑3 per year to cool large quantum computers on Earth, a demand that exists regardless of the pace of fusion research.

At the same time, NASA’s framing of helium‑3 as a potential cornerstone of future fusion power, highlighted in analyses that call it The most powerful energy source in history, keeps the longer‑term vision in play. I see the emerging strategy as a two‑track approach: build a near‑term business around cryogenics and quantum technologies to finance the infrastructure, while keeping the door open for a much larger fusion market if and when reactor designs that can use helium‑3 mature.

The trillion‑dollar question: who controls lunar fuel?

As the numbers around lunar helium‑3 grow, so do the questions about ownership and control. Estimates that put the value of helium‑3 in the lunar regolith at There being 1.34 quadrillion dollars on the bright side of the Moon alone highlight the stakes for any country or company that can establish an early foothold. Existing space law, built around the Outer Space Treaty, prohibits national appropriation of celestial bodies but is far less clear about the extraction and sale of resources, leaving room for competing interpretations.

In practice, I expect the first movers, whether they are national agencies like NASA and THE or private firms like Interlune, to shape de facto norms simply by operating. The combination of massive projected value, strategic energy implications, and relatively light legal scaffolding makes helium‑3 not just a scientific and commercial story but a governance challenge that will test how humanity manages shared resources beyond Earth.

Why the “massive numbers” matter now

When I step back from the technical details, what stands out is how quickly helium‑3 has moved from the fringes of space policy into the center of serious economic planning. NASA’s references to 3 million tons of helium‑3 on the Moon, Japan’s talk of a $4 trillion energy source, Interlune’s $300 million supply deal with Bluefors, and valuations that reach into the quadrillions all point in the same direction. The Moon is being reimagined as a fuel reservoir whose exploitation could reshape energy markets, quantum technology, and geopolitical alignments over the coming decades.

At the same time, the path from regolith to reactor is far from guaranteed. The hardware is still experimental, the legal framework is unsettled, and the ultimate scale of demand, especially for fusion, remains uncertain. Yet the combination of concrete contracts, maturing lunar transport under programs like NASA’s CLPS, and the sheer disparity between helium‑3 abundance on the Moon and scarcity on Earth convinces me that the race to tap this resource has already begun in earnest. The numbers are massive, but so are the bets that governments and companies are now placing on turning lunar dust into the next great energy revolution.

More from MorningOverview