MIT engineers say they have increased the energy density of their carbon-cement supercapacitor system by roughly tenfold, with MIT’s reporting attributing the biggest jump to a switch to organic electrolytes alongside changes to how the material is made. The peer-reviewed results, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, push the technology closer to a point where ordinary concrete walls, foundations, or roads could double as energy storage. If the numbers hold up at scale, a volume of about 5 cubic meters of this material could meet a typical home’s daily electricity needs, down from roughly 45 cubic meters required by the earlier version.
From Carbon Black to Organic Electrolytes
The original electron-conducting carbon concrete, or ec3, concept dates to a 2023 proof-of-concept that combined Portland cement with carbon black. When mixed with water, the carbon black self-assembles into a conductive network inside the hardened cement, creating a supercapacitor that can charge and discharge rapidly. Early demonstrations were modest: small cells that could power an LED, with limited voltage and scaling constraints that kept the technology firmly in the lab. Those first tests nonetheless established that the porous microstructure of cement paste could host a percolating carbon network suitable for electrochemical storage.
In MIT’s 2025 reporting on the peer-reviewed work, the researchers describe tackling those limits head-on. MIT’s CEE write-up says the greatest performance came from organic electrolytes combining quaternary ammonium compounds. Organic electrolytes tolerate higher voltages than the aqueous potassium chloride solution used in the original work, and higher voltage translates directly into more stored energy per unit of material. That single chemistry swap accounts for much of the reported tenfold improvement, which MIT highlighted in a 2025 campus news release describing how a few cubic meters of ec3 could, in principle, keep household appliances running for a day.
Thicker Electrodes and Linear Scaling
Chemistry alone did not close the gap. The team also introduced what they call a “cast-in electrolyte” manufacturing approach, which allows the electrolyte to be incorporated during the concrete casting process rather than soaked in afterward. The practical result is that electrodes can be made substantially thicker without losing performance, because the electrolyte saturates the porous carbon network from the start. Conventional supercapacitor designs often suffer diminishing returns as electrode thickness grows, since ions struggle to penetrate deep into the material. The cast-in method sidesteps that bottleneck, and the researchers used focused ion beam tomography alongside other imaging tools to map the internal pore structure and confirm that the electrolyte reaches throughout.
According to the paper’s abstract, the approach yields linear scaling with both electrode thickness and cell count. That means stacking more layers or pouring thicker slabs increases energy storage proportionally, without the efficiency drop-off that plagues many electrode systems. The team reported a 12-volt, 50-farad module and a separate 9-volt architecture in the study and related materials, including the PubMed record for the paper. In concrete terms, the new ec3 stores approximately 2 kWh per cubic meter, which is why the volume needed to supply a home’s daily energy dropped from about 45 cubic meters to roughly 5. That figure assumes continuous cycling within the voltage window supported by the organic electrolyte and does not yet include real-world inefficiencies such as inverter losses or temperature-driven performance shifts.
What the Numbers Actually Mean for Buildings
A supercapacitor is not a battery. It charges and discharges faster, handles far more cycles without degradation, but typically stores less energy per unit volume than lithium-ion cells. The 2 kWh per cubic meter figure, while a tenfold jump for this material class, still falls well short of lithium-ion battery packs. The real value proposition is different: concrete is already everywhere. Foundations, walls, driveways, and road surfaces are poured in enormous volumes every year. If even a fraction of that concrete could store energy, the total capacity could be significant without requiring dedicated battery rooms or rare-earth minerals. For architects and engineers trained through programs like MIT’s academic offerings, the idea that a passive structural material could double as an active energy component hints at new building typologies.
That framing matters because intermittent renewables like solar and wind need storage buffers. Solar panels, as MIT’s sustainability office notes, generate power only when sunlight is available. A building whose walls and foundation can absorb excess midday solar production and release it in the evening would reduce its dependence on the grid during peak hours. A key open question, not detailed in the MIT summaries and the linked paper materials here, is whether ec3 can match the structural strength and long-term durability of conventional concrete under real-world loads. Without independent verification of mechanical performance and cycling life under stress, the storage numbers remain a laboratory achievement rather than a construction-ready specification, and questions about fire behavior, freeze–thaw resistance, and corrosion interactions with embedded rebar still need answers.
Industry Backing and Patent Activity
MIT is not treating ec3 as a purely academic exercise. The Technology Licensing Office lists patent families and granted patents for the material, with intended applications spanning structural supercapacitors, heated pavement, and conductive traces embedded in concrete. A five-year sponsored research agreement with a Japanese industry consortium, announced in 2024, targets infrastructure applications including roads that could wirelessly charge electric vehicles while they drive. That kind of long-horizon partnership fits into a broader portfolio of MIT research initiatives that aim to translate lab-scale materials science into deployable technologies.
The Japanese partnership signals that at least some industrial players see enough promise to commit multi-year funding, though no public timeline for field demonstrations has been disclosed. The gap between a 12-volt lab module and a highway slab carrying truck traffic is enormous, and cost-per-kWh comparisons to conventional lithium-ion storage remain absent from the published research. Still, the combination of patent activity, consortium backing, and peer-reviewed performance data suggests that ec3 has moved beyond a scientific curiosity. Next steps could include pilot-scale pours in noncritical structures, where engineers could monitor both electrochemical behavior and structural performance over time. If those pilots confirm the lab results, the idea of buildings and infrastructure quietly acting as giant, rechargeable supercapacitors may shift from speculative concept to a practical tool in the energy transition.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
