Across the United States, school hallways are suddenly quieter in one important way: millions of students are being told to keep their phones out of sight for the entire school day. A fast‑moving wave of state‑level rules is pushing districts toward strict limits on student devices, often from the first bell to the last. The shift is reshaping classroom life, family routines and the politics of education all at once.
Instead of a patchwork of individual principals experimenting with pouches and lockboxes, governors and legislatures are now writing expectations into law or formal guidance. The result is a new era in which phone use is no longer just a classroom management issue, but a statewide policy question that pits concerns about distraction and mental health against demands for constant connectivity and safety.
The new map of school phone bans
Statehouses that once left device rules to local boards are now setting the tone, and in some cases the details, for how students can use their phones. A policy tracker from Civic IQ reports that twenty‑six States now have what it calls Active Cell Phone Restriction Laws, listing each State, the Policy Type and when it becomes Effective. That tally aligns with a national map of restrictions that shows a band of states, from coastal population centers to rural interiors, moving in the same direction even as they differ on enforcement details.
Separate national reporting on which jurisdictions ban or limit devices in class underscores how quickly the landscape has shifted. A breakdown of Which States Ban or Restrict Cellphones in Schools details how many have statewide Policy Enforcement Requirement rules and how many still leave decisions to districts. A separate analysis of States with Active Laws or Executive Orders that Ban or Restrict Cell Phones shows that the movement is not confined to one region, listing states as varied as Montana, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Washington and Wyoming alongside early adopters.
‘Bell‑to‑bell’ bans and what they mean in practice
Within that broader trend, the most aggressive approach is the so‑called bell‑to‑bell model, in which students are barred from using personal devices for the entire instructional day. National coverage of states banning cellphones in schools describes how some laws now require a Bell to bell prohibition, often with narrow carve‑outs for medical or emergency needs. A separate explainer notes that, earlier this school year, several states rolled out what they explicitly called bell‑to‑bell bans, signaling that phones should stay put away from the first class through dismissal, not just during individual lessons.
One widely cited map of restrictions goes further, identifying twenty‑six states with full‑day Full Bans that prohibit students from using personal devices during school hours except for medical or emergency needs. A companion analysis of the same News map notes that these full bans now stretch from large states like Texas, California and New York to smaller ones such as Nebraska and Alaska, illustrating how the bell‑to‑bell idea has moved from pilot programs to statewide norms.
How individual states are tightening the rules
Behind the national numbers are a series of state‑specific moves that show how quickly policy is evolving. In New Jersey, Governor Phil Murphy has become one of the most prominent champions of strict limits. His office says that, on January 8, On January 8th, Governor Murphy signed what his administration calls a bell‑to‑bell cell phone ban into law, with the measure set to take effect in the 2026‑27 school year. The New Jersey Department of Education followed up with guidance explaining that local districts must comply with the statewide ban while still tailoring details to the needs of each local school community, according to a memo from New Jersey Department.
Other states are moving through their legislatures rather than via executive action. In Michigan, a smartphone ban cleared the state House on the first day of the session, with the House approving a school cellphone ban that sponsors say is aimed at improving focus and reducing cyberbullying. A separate report on the same measure notes that, if signed into law as written, the smartphone ban would take effect this fall for the start of the 2026‑27 school year and that Many school leaders are already preparing for implementation. Wisconsin has also tightened expectations, with a story headlined New Cell Phone explaining that Students and the staff are adjusting to rules that keep phones out of reach during the day.
Local battles inside the broader wave
Even as state rules expand, much of the conflict is still playing out district by district. In Jersey City, a notice to families explained that a new policy would prohibit Share Jersey City Public Schools students from using cellphones and other personal communication devices during instructional time, a move that goes beyond previous classroom‑by‑classroom rules. Advocates for stricter limits have also promoted model policies through campaigns like Away For The Day, which highlights that these restrictions range from full bell‑to‑bell bans to partial limits with some usage allowed on school campus.
In Georgia, the debate is still unfolding in the legislature. A proposal introduced in the Georgia General Assembly would bar high school students from using phones during the school day, with one report describing the Loading of a Bill to ban cell phone usage in Georgia high schools as part of a broader Education package. Another account focuses on the sponsor, noting that Georgia state Rep Scott Hilton, R‑Peachtree Corners, told reporter Meimei Xu of WABE that he sees the measure as a way to restore attention in class.
Supporters, opponents and the unresolved questions
Supporters of strict bans argue that the stakes go beyond simple distraction. A national overview of states banning cellphones in schools notes that, over the latest back‑to‑school season, many jurisdictions cited concerns about social media, cheating and classroom disruption when they moved to limit devices, while some still left decisions to local districts and carved out exceptions for students who have individualized education programs, according to a section introduced with the word While. Another national roundup of states banning cellphones in schools underscores how often lawmakers now frame these policies as mental health interventions as much as academic ones.
Opponents, however, warn that sweeping bans can be blunt instruments. A policy review from Ballotpedia notes that Opponents said enforcing classroom cellphone bans can be difficult and that many parents use cellphones to keep in contact with their children, especially during emergencies. Campus safety specialists have also cataloged the tradeoffs, with one analysis of which states have banned cell phones in schools pointing out that some laws explicitly allow phones to remain on campus but require them to be stored in lockers or locked pouches.
More from Morning Overview