Humanity’s understanding of itself is being shaken by artificial intelligence, neuroscience and a renewed interest in consciousness. Michael Pollan, long known for changing how people think about food and plants, is now arguing that these forces are converging into a radical shift in how we define what it means to be human. He is treating this as a civilizational turning point, not a passing philosophical fad, and he is reorganizing his work around that premise.
At the center of his warning is a simple but unsettling idea: the stories that once grounded our sense of human specialness are no longer holding. As machines grow more “intelligent” and science probes the mind with new tools, Pollan is pressing audiences to decide whether we are closer to intelligent machines or to conscious, feeling animals, and what follows if the answer is uncomfortable.
The “Copernican moment” in the age of AI
Pollan has started to describe the current moment as a kind of second Copernican shock, a time when humans are again being pushed out of the center of the story. In recent conversations he has framed the core dilemma in stark terms, asking whether we are more like intelligent machines or conscious, feeling animals, and suggesting that the rise of artificial intelligence is forcing that comparison into everyday life. That framing is not just rhetorical flourish, it is his way of saying that the boundary between human minds and other forms of cognition is becoming the defining question of the era.
In one widely shared discussion highlighted on social media, the prompt “Are we more like intelligent machines or conscious, feeling animals?” is presented as the hinge of Pollan’s argument, with the line that we are approaching a “Copernican moment of redefinition” of what makes us human anchored to the spread of A.I. technologies in work, art and even intimate communication. The post, tagged with Are and With the, underscores how he is using that question to pull a broad audience into a debate that once lived mostly in philosophy seminars.
From food rules to a broader human experiment
Pollan’s authority in this new terrain rests in part on the credibility he built by changing how people think about eating. He became a household name by boiling nutrition advice down to a few plainspoken rules, including the now famous injunction to “Eat real food,” which he has contrasted with the more technocratic language of official dietary guidance. When the federal government unveiled an updated food pyramid as part of a “Make America Healthy Again” agenda, he was drawn into a public debate with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a clash that was chronicled by By Sara Deseran Published Jan in a piece that quoted his “Eat” mantra and set it against the administration’s more prescriptive approach to diet and health policy, a dispute captured in coverage of the Jan rollout.
That earlier work on food, agriculture and the industrial system now functions as a template for how Pollan approaches the human mind. On his own site, which gathers decades of reporting, essays and book projects, he has been steadily expanding from nutrition and gardening into questions of consciousness, psychedelics and the stories cultures tell about nature and intelligence, a shift that is visible across the projects cataloged on michaelpollan.com. The throughline is his insistence that seemingly technical systems, whether dietary guidelines or machine learning models, always smuggle in values about what counts as a good life and a worthy form of awareness.
A revolutionary change in how we define “human”
Pollan’s warning about a radical shift is not just about gadgets or workplace automation, it is about a wholesale reclassification of minds. In a recent long-form conversation, he argued that humanity is about to undergo a revolutionary change in self-understanding, language that has been echoed and amplified in commentary that picked up his phrase almost verbatim. One widely circulated reflection on that exchange, labeled as a Joshua Greenbaum Post, summarized his position under the line “Michael Pollan Says Humanity Is About to Undergo a Revolutionary Change,” framing it as a turning point in how societies will draw the line between people, animals and machines, a framing that has been shared through Michael Pollan Says and tagged with the language of “Undergo” and “Revolutionary Change.”
In that same conversation, Pollan leaned on his reporting background to argue that the way we talk about intelligence is already being reshaped by A.I. systems that can mimic human conversation, produce images and even draft legislation. He pointed to the way people casually attribute agency to chatbots and recommendation engines, then contrasted that with how reluctant many are to grant rich inner lives to nonhuman animals, a tension that he sees as unsustainable. The fact that this argument is being discussed in business and technology circles, not just among literary readers, is evident in the way the Joshua Greenbaum Post treats Pollan’s remarks as a strategic signal for executives and policymakers trying to anticipate how public attitudes might shift as these tools become more embedded in daily life.
Consciousness, animals and the limits of machine metaphors
Pollan’s current work is pushing hard against the idea that the brain is simply a computer made of meat. In a detailed interview that has been transcribed for podcast listeners, he is pressed on what good it does to ask whether humans are more like machines or animals, and he responds by arguing that the metaphor we choose has real consequences for how we treat other beings. The transcript notes that the starting point is 00:08:48, with the exchange marked by prompts like Starting, What, Yeah and You as the interviewer pushes him to spell out why he thinks our moral circle will have to expand to include more animals and perhaps other kinds of creatures if we take consciousness seriously.
In that discussion, Pollan draws on his years of writing about plants and fungi to argue that intelligence and awareness come in many forms, some of which do not look anything like human thought. He suggests that treating the mind purely as an information processor risks flattening those differences and making it easier to ignore suffering in beings that do not resemble us. The transcript’s focus on his back and forth with the interviewer, captured in the repeated cues of What and Yeah, shows him working through the implications in real time, insisting that the metaphors we use for minds will shape everything from animal welfare law to how we design and deploy A.I. systems that might one day claim a kind of personhood.
Books, events and the widening Pollan project
Pollan is not leaving these ideas at the level of interviews. He has built them into a new book project, World Appear, which he announced to readers in a long Substack letter that opened with the salutation Dear and included the striking figure 389 to mark the number of comments and reactions it had already drawn. In that announcement, dated Sep in the archive, he described A World Appear as an attempt to braid together neuroscience, plant science and spiritual traditions into a fresh account of how consciousness arises, a project he said would move more deeply into philosophy, literature and religion, a direction he laid out in detail on World Appear.
What emerges from all of this is a portrait of a writer who believes that the next frontier of reform is not just how we eat or farm, but how we classify minds and distribute moral concern. By tying the question “Are we more like intelligent machines or conscious, feeling animals?” to concrete choices about diet, technology and law, Pollan is arguing that the coming radical shift will be measured not only in algorithms and brain scans, but in the everyday habits and policies that reveal who we think counts as fully alive.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
