Google’s push to catch up in generative AI has produced an unusual hiring pattern in 2025, with a striking share of new technical roles going to people who already know the company from the inside. Instead of relying only on fresh recruits from rivals and universities, Google has leaned heavily on so‑called “boomerang” staff, rehiring former engineers and managers into its most sensitive AI teams. The result is that a significant portion of the company’s AI software engineering intake this year has effectively been a homecoming.
That choice says as much about the state of the AI talent market as it does about Google’s internal culture. In a year when OpenAI, Meta, Anthropic and a long list of startups are all chasing the same limited pool of experts, Google has decided that the fastest way to rebuild momentum is to bring back people who already understand its codebases, infrastructure and politics. I see that as a calculated bet that familiarity, not just raw brilliance, will decide who wins the next phase of the AI race.
The 20% figure that defines Google’s “boomerang” year
The clearest sign that this is more than a quirky anecdote is the scale of the numbers involved. Reporting on Google’s internal hiring data indicates that some 20% of the company’s software engineers working on AI who were hired in 2025 are ex‑employees, a proportion that would be remarkable in any year, let alone in the middle of an industry‑wide hiring frenzy. One detailed breakdown describes 2025 as Google’s “boomerang year”, noting that Some 20% of Google software developers hired into AI roles this year previously left the company, only to return.
That 20% share is not a rounding error, it is a structural choice. Internal recruitment trackers cited in European academic analysis describe how Google’s 2025 AI recruitment drive has pushed rehired employees to the same 20% threshold, framing it as a Recruitment Boosts Rehired Employees
Why the AI talent war pushed Google back to its alumni
To understand why Google is leaning so hard on its alumni network, it helps to look at the broader battlefield. Competition for AI specialists has intensified among OpenAI, Meta, Anthropic and the rest of Big Tech, with each company racing to secure researchers and engineers who can ship large‑scale models and the infrastructure around them. One market analysis describes how the fight for AI talent among companies such as Meta and Anthropic
In that environment, Google’s alumni represent a rare advantage. Many of the engineers who left during earlier waves of restructuring or to join hot startups already know the internal tooling, the culture of code review and the expectations of its AI leadership. Rather than outbidding every rival for entirely new faces, Google has increasingly rehired former employees as competition for AI talent intensifies, a pattern that outside observers have flagged as Google is increasingly rehiring
Inside Google’s deliberate “boomerang” hiring strategy
What makes 2025 different is that rehiring is no longer a side effect of individual managers calling old colleagues, it has become a structured tactic. Internal briefings described by Dec and other observers say Google has adopted a new tactic in the battle for AI talent, explicitly positioning rehiring former employees as a core part of its plan to catch up in generative AI. One widely shared briefing notes that Google has adopted a new
Specialist HR analysis goes further, arguing that How Google’s Boomerang Hiring Strategy Wins AI Talent War Against
How former Googlers are reshaping AI teams from within
The impact of this rehiring wave is most visible inside the structure of Google’s AI teams. Internal snapshots shared with Dec show that roughly 20% of software engineers working on AI in 2025 are now former employees, a figure that has changed the mix of experience and institutional memory on key projects. One internal note cited by a Journalist. … Google
From what I can piece together, these returning engineers are not just filling headcount, they are anchoring teams that blend long‑term Google DNA with newer hires from startups and academic labs. That mix matters in AI, where shipping a large model or a new inference stack often depends on knowing how to navigate internal infrastructure as much as it does on cutting‑edge research. By seeding each group with a critical mass of boomerang staff, Google is effectively using its own history as a force multiplier for current projects.
The 2023 layoffs backdrop and why people are coming back
None of this is happening in a vacuum. Only two years ago, Google carried out the largest layoffs in its history in 2023, cutting thousands of roles across engineering, product and support. That episode pushed many skilled people out of the company and into competitors, startups or sabbaticals, creating a diaspora of ex‑Googlers who still had deep knowledge of the company’s AI systems. When 2025’s generative AI race intensified, that pool of alumni suddenly looked less like a loss and more like a latent asset that could be tapped.
For the individuals involved, the decision to return often reflects a changed calculus. Some left for early‑stage AI startups that struggled to find product‑market fit, others joined larger rivals only to find slower promotion tracks or less familiar tooling. As Google’s 2025 AI recruitment drive ramped up and the company signaled that rehired employees would account for around 20% of new AI roles, the message was clear that this was a Signaling Strategic Shift and Talent Re
Speed, trust and the practical advantages of rehiring
From a purely operational standpoint, rehiring former employees gives Google three advantages that are hard to replicate with brand‑new hires. First, onboarding is faster. Engineers who already know the internal build systems, security reviews and launch processes can start contributing to production code in weeks rather than months, which matters when generative AI products are shipping on tight timelines. Second, trust is easier to establish. Managers know these people’s track records, and returning staff know how decisions are really made, which reduces the friction that often slows down new teams.
Third, boomerang hires can act as cultural translators between old and new Google. Many of the alumni returning in 2025 left during a period when the company was more research‑driven and less reactive to external competition. They are now re‑entering a context where Google is explicitly trying to catch up in generative AI, and their presence can help reconcile those two identities. Analysts who have tracked the trend argue that While most tech companies struggle
Risks, blind spots and what Google could miss
There is, however, a real risk that relying heavily on former employees could narrow Google’s perspective at a time when the AI field is evolving quickly. If one in five new AI hires is a returning Googler, that is a significant portion of the intake that already shares the same assumptions about how products should be built and shipped. In a space where new architectures, training regimes and safety practices are emerging from a wide range of labs and startups, over‑indexing on internal familiarity could make it harder to absorb genuinely disruptive ideas from the outside.
There is also the question of morale among those who never left. Some long‑serving staff who endured the 2023 layoffs and subsequent reorganizations may now be watching colleagues who departed return on higher compensation packages or with more favorable titles. Academic observers who have looked at the 20% rehiring figure warn that this kind of Entry, Introduc
How rivals might respond to Google’s alumni‑first play
Google’s pivot toward rehiring is unlikely to go unnoticed by its competitors. If the company can show that its 20% boomerang intake correlates with faster AI launches or more stable teams, OpenAI, Meta and Anthropic will face pressure to formalize their own alumni programs rather than treating ex‑employees as a passive network. Some of that is already visible in the way Meta and Anthropic have intensified their own recruiting, as highlighted in analyses of the competition for AI talent
At the same time, Google’s approach could trigger a broader shift in how tech workers think about leaving and returning. If it becomes normal for a high‑performing AI engineer to cycle from Google to a startup and back again within a few years, the stigma around “boomeranging” will fade, and alumni networks will become more like extended project teams than permanent exits. Social media commentary has already picked up on the trend, with one widely shared post noting that Googl
What this reveals about Google’s AI priorities in 2025
Ultimately, the fact that so many of Google’s 2025 AI hires are former employees tells us something important about where the company’s priorities lie. Rather than betting everything on headline‑grabbing superstar recruits, Google is trying to rebuild its AI edge by re‑activating the institutional knowledge it already created over the past decade. The decision to make roughly 20% of AI software engineering hires ex‑Googlers, as confirmed by both internal briefings and external analyses, reflects a belief that speed and reliability matter more right now than radical reinvention.
At the same time, the company is clearly aware that it cannot win the generative AI race on nostalgia alone. Reports that Google is bringing back
More from MorningOverview