Large language models are routinely described in terms of their size, with figures like 7 billion or 70 billion parameters tossed around as shorthand for power. Yet for anyone outside the machine learning world, that word can feel like jargon, obscuring more than it explains. At its core, a parameter is simply a number inside the model that has been tuned so the system can turn raw text into predictions about what comes next.
Understanding what those numbers represent, how they are learned, and why their count matters is essential to making sense of modern AI. When I unpack what parameters actually are, the mystery around “large” models gives way to a more concrete picture of how these systems store knowledge, make decisions, and trade off between capability and cost.
From math class to machine learning: what “parameter” really means
In everyday math, a parameter is a value that shapes a function’s behavior, like the slope in the equation of a line. In neural networks, the idea is similar, but multiplied across millions or billions of tiny functions that connect artificial neurons. Each of those connections has a numeric setting that determines how strongly one neuron influences another, and those settings are what the field calls parameters.
When people talk about parameters in AI, they are usually referring to the weights and biases that define how inputs are transformed as they pass through the network. One glossary describes parameters in AI as the internal variables that the model learns during training, specifically the weights and biases of the neurons. In that sense, “parameter” is not an abstract buzzword, it is the concrete set of numbers that give a model its particular behavior.
Inside an LLM: parameters as learned weights and biases
Large language models, or LLMs, are built from stacked layers of artificial neurons that process text tokens step by step. At each layer, the model multiplies the incoming values by weight matrices, adds bias terms, and passes the result through nonlinear functions. Every entry in those weight matrices and every bias term is a parameter, and together they define how the model turns a sequence of words into a probability distribution over the next token.
Technical explainers describe LLM parameters as the settings that control and optimize a large language model’s output and behavior, shaping how it interprets input and generates responses. Another overview puts it even more plainly, noting that LLM parameters are the learned numerical weights that allow the model to produce coherent, human-like text. In practice, that means every time an LLM answers a question or writes a paragraph, it is applying those learned weights and biases to the input tokens to decide which word should come next.
How training turns data into parameters
Before training, the parameters in a neural network are typically random numbers, which means the model has no useful knowledge about language or the world. Training is the process of exposing the model to vast amounts of text, measuring how wrong its predictions are, and then nudging the parameters so that future predictions are slightly better. This cycle repeats billions of times, gradually sculpting the random initial values into a configuration that captures patterns in grammar, facts, and reasoning.
One community explanation describes how each neuron receives inputs, multiplies them by weights, and then adjusts those weights during learning so that the network’s outputs become more accurate. In that description, the Comments Section emphasizes that these weight adjustments across many neurons create an even larger network of tuned parameters. Over time, the training process encodes statistical regularities of the training data into those weights and biases, so the model can generalize from past examples to new prompts.
Parameters as the “DNA” of a language model
Once training is complete, the parameters effectively act as the model’s DNA, defining its capabilities, style, and limitations. Two models with the same architecture but different parameter values can behave very differently, much like two organisms with similar body plans but different genetic sequences. The parameters determine which patterns the model has internalized, how it balances creativity against caution, and how it responds to subtle cues in prompts.
Some technical glossaries explicitly frame parameters in LLMs as a kind of “model DNA,” arguing that they encode the learned structure of language and are vital for modern AI development. Key summaries of this view highlight that Key Takeaways from current practice include the idea that getting the parameter count, architecture, and data alignment right is essential for performance. In that framing, the raw number of parameters is less important than how effectively those parameters have been trained and aligned with the intended use.
Why parameter counts became a proxy for power
Over the past few years, AI labs have raced to build models with ever larger parameter counts, and those numbers have become a kind of marketing shorthand. A model with 7 billion parameters is often presented as “small” compared with one that has 70 billion, and the implication is that more parameters mean more capacity to memorize patterns and represent complex relationships. In many cases, scaling up parameter counts has indeed led to better performance on benchmarks and more fluent text generation.
Technical primers on LLM parameters note that these counts directly affect the model’s capacity and complexity, influencing how nuanced its outputs can be. Other explainers stress that LLM parameters refer to the internal weights and values that determine the model’s performance and complexity, which is why parameter counts are often used as a rough indicator of potential capability. Still, as architectures improve, some smaller models are starting to rival larger ones, showing that parameter count is only one piece of the story.
Parameters, memory, and the “tiny dials” metaphor
For non-specialists, it can be helpful to think of parameters as tiny dials that the training process turns to tune the model’s behavior. Each dial on its own does almost nothing, but when you have billions of them, they can collectively encode very rich patterns. During training, the optimization algorithm tweaks these dials in response to errors, gradually finding a configuration that makes the model’s predictions match the training data as closely as possible without simply memorizing it.
One short explainer invites viewers to Think of parameters as millions of tiny dials in an AI system, each contributing a small part to the overall intelligence. That metaphor captures why parameters are often compared to memory: they store the distilled outcome of training, not as explicit facts, but as a high-dimensional pattern of dial settings that the model can draw on when generating text. When I ask an LLM to summarize a novel or explain a law, it is effectively consulting those dial settings to infer a plausible answer.
How parameters shape output and behavior
Because parameters define how inputs are transformed at every layer, they directly influence the style, accuracy, and safety of the model’s responses. A model whose parameters have been tuned on code will be better at generating functions and debugging errors, while one trained heavily on conversational data will feel more like a chat partner. Fine-tuning, which adjusts parameters on a narrower dataset, can shift a general-purpose model toward specific tasks such as legal drafting, customer support, or medical summarization.
Technical descriptions emphasize that LLM parameters are the settings that control the model’s internal structure and shape its output. Additional guidance frames Key Takeaways from current practice around the idea that parameter quality, not just quantity, determines how well a model aligns with user expectations and safety constraints. In other words, the same architecture can behave very differently depending on how its parameters have been trained and refined.
Why more parameters also mean more cost
Every parameter is a number that must be stored and processed, so parameter counts have direct implications for hardware requirements and latency. A model with 70 billion parameters will typically require far more memory and compute than one with 7 billion, which affects where and how it can be deployed. On consumer devices like smartphones or laptops, parameter-heavy models can be impractical without aggressive compression or offloading to the cloud.
Guides to model deployment point out that Download size grows with parameter count, which in turn affects whether a model can realistically run in a browser or on-device. Those same discussions stress that more parameters mean a larger download size and higher memory use, which can slow down inference and increase energy consumption. For organizations deciding between hosting a massive model in the cloud or using a smaller one locally, the parameter count becomes a concrete budget and infrastructure question, not just a performance metric.
Smarter use of parameters: efficiency and alignment
As the field matures, researchers are increasingly focused on using parameters more efficiently rather than simply adding more of them. Techniques like pruning, quantization, and low-rank adaptation aim to reduce the number of active parameters or the precision of their values while preserving performance. The goal is to keep the “model DNA” that matters while trimming redundant or low-impact parameters that add cost without much benefit.
Some overviews of Understanding Model DNA argue that parameter efficiency and data alignment are as important as raw scale for modern AI development. In that view, the future of LLMs is less about chasing ever larger parameter counts and more about designing architectures and training regimes that make each parameter pull its weight. When I look at the current landscape, the most interesting advances often come from models that do more with fewer parameters, not just those that set new size records.
More from Morning Overview