The Bureau of Reclamation’s most recent forecast for Lake Powell paints a picture that should alarm anyone who depends on Colorado River water or the hydropower generated at Glen Canyon Dam. Official projections already show that under a worst-case scenario, the reservoir could approach levels where power generation becomes physically impossible. But a closer look at the numbers, combined with a dry winter that has already slashed inflow expectations, suggests that the timeline for reaching those critical thresholds is tighter than the agency’s baseline projections imply.
Inflow Forecasts Point to a Shrinking Window
The January 2026 forecast for water year 2026 unregulated inflow to Lake Powell set the most probable figure at 6.50 million acre-feet (maf), with a minimum probable of just 4.78 maf, according to the Bureau of Reclamation’s Glen Canyon operations page. That minimum figure represents a scenario in which the reservoir receives barely enough water to sustain basic operations, let alone recover lost storage. The gap between the best and worst cases is enormous, and the system’s margin for error has been thinning for years as prolonged drought and rising temperatures cut into the snowpack that feeds the Colorado River.
Then came February. A lack of precipitation over the preceding month pushed the most probable water year inflow forecast down by 1.5 maf, according to a Bureau of Reclamation news release from Washington that warned of the implications for Glen Canyon hydropower. That single monthly revision effectively moved the most probable scenario closer to what had been the low end of the January forecast. The speed of that downward shift reveals how volatile these projections are and how quickly conditions can deteriorate when snowpack fails to materialize. Hydrologic inputs from the Colorado Basin forecast center reflect the same dry signal that prompted Reclamation’s revision, underscoring how sensitive the system is to a few bad weeks of winter weather.
Operational Thresholds Are Closer Than They Appear
Two elevation numbers define the danger zone for Glen Canyon Dam. Minimum power pool sits at 3,490 feet, the level below which the dam’s turbines can no longer generate hydropower. Dead pool, at approximately 3,370 feet, is the point at which water can no longer flow through the dam at all. Reclamation has publicly acknowledged both thresholds and, in a prior news release, warned that Powell projections were at risk of dropping below minimum power pool. That same release documented the completion of a new water intake connection at Page, Arizona, an infrastructure modification that only becomes necessary when officials believe the reservoir could fall to levels that threaten basic water delivery to nearby communities.
The Congressional Research Service compiled these operational thresholds and related agency actions in CRS Report R47497, which catalogs Reclamation’s protective measures including reduced Glen Canyon releases and transfers under the Drought Response Operations Agreement. The report makes clear that minimum power pool is not a theoretical concern but a threshold that has driven real policy decisions. When the reservoir drops below 3,490 feet, Glen Canyon Dam stops producing electricity for customers across the West, and the operational flexibility that allows managers to balance water deliveries between the Upper and Lower Colorado River basins shrinks dramatically. That loss of flexibility raises the stakes for every inflow forecast revision and every management decision taken upstream.
Why Official Projections May Understate the Risk
Most public discussion of Lake Powell’s future relies on Reclamation’s “most probable” inflow scenario, which assumes roughly average conditions going forward. But the system’s recent history suggests that below-average years can cluster together, and the February downward revision of 1.5 maf in a single month demonstrates how quickly optimistic baselines can erode. The interim operating guidelines adopted in 2007, which govern coordinated operations of Lake Powell and Lake Mead, were designed for drought and low reservoir conditions. Yet even those guidelines assumed a range of hydrologic variability that may no longer capture the severity of the current dry period, especially as warming temperatures increase evaporation and reduce runoff efficiency from the same amount of snow.
There is also a physical factor that standard inflow projections do not fully address: the reservoir’s effective storage capacity has been shrinking due to decades of sediment accumulation. The U.S. Geological Survey maintains a detailed topobathymetric model of Lake Powell from 1947 to 2018, which provides the physical basis for understanding how much water the reservoir can actually hold at any given elevation. When sediment fills in the bottom of the pool, the storage-elevation relationship shifts: a given water level holds less water than it did when the dam was built. This means that even if inflows match the most probable forecast, the functional buffer above critical thresholds is smaller than raw elevation numbers suggest, and the system can move from apparent safety to crisis more quickly than a simple elevation chart would imply.
The USGS has also published extent polygons for the reservoir at five-foot elevation increments from full pool down to dead pool, mapping the lake’s footprint as it shrinks. These datasets, tied to levels critical to Glen Canyon Dam operations, allow analysts to visualize exactly how much surface area and volume disappear as the reservoir drops. The practical consequence is that each foot of decline near the bottom of the pool represents a proportionally larger loss of usable storage than each foot lost near the top. As the lake approaches minimum power pool, small forecasting errors or short-lived dry spells can therefore have outsized operational consequences.
Emergency Measures and the Policy Response So Far
Reclamation has not been idle in the face of these risks. The agency signed a Record of Decision for a supplemental environmental review of near-term Colorado River operations, formalizing tools such as reduced releases from Glen Canyon Dam, emergency conservation, and potential adjustments to Lower Basin deliveries. Those steps build on earlier actions under the Drought Response Operations Agreement, which authorized the transfer of water from upstream reservoirs to bolster Lake Powell when projections fell toward critical elevations. Together, these measures are designed to buy time, keeping the reservoir above minimum power pool while longer-term negotiations over post-2026 operating rules play out among the basin states and tribal governments.
Yet emergency measures cannot substitute for water that simply is not there. Climate and hydrology experts increasingly stress that planning must account for a drier baseline rather than treating recent conditions as an anomaly. Agencies such as NOAA and the National Weather Service at weather.gov continue to refine seasonal outlooks and drought monitoring tools, which feed into the hydrologic models used by Reclamation and the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center. Those tools can help managers anticipate trouble earlier, but they cannot reverse the underlying trend toward reduced runoff in a warming climate. Without deeper, durable reductions in Colorado River water use across the basin, Lake Powell’s narrow margin above its critical thresholds will remain precarious, and each dry winter will once again raise the question of how close Glen Canyon Dam can come to the edge before the lights start to flicker.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
