Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang has told employees that every task that can be automated with artificial intelligence should be, turning the chip giant into a live experiment in full‑spectrum AI adoption. His directive, delivered in an internal meeting and captured in a leaked recording, goes far beyond generic enthusiasm for productivity tools and amounts to a mandate to rebuild day‑to‑day work around AI systems.
By urging staff to treat AI as the default way to get things done, Huang is testing a thesis that many executives only discuss in theory: that a company can aggressively automate internal workflows while still promising job growth and new opportunities for the people whose routines are being rewritten. How Nvidia navigates that tension will shape not only its own culture but also the broader debate over what “AI‑first” really means inside a large, profitable tech firm.
Inside Huang’s “automate everything” order
Huang’s message to Nvidia staff was not a gentle suggestion to experiment with chatbots, it was a blunt instruction that any task capable of being handled by AI should be handed off to software. In the leaked internal meeting, he framed resistance to this shift as irrational, telling employees that managers who discouraged AI use were effectively ignoring the company’s own technology and the competitive edge it provides. That framing turns AI adoption from a personal preference into a performance expectation, especially for leaders who control how teams spend their time.
Accounts of the meeting describe Huang pushing employees to look at their daily routines line by line and ask which steps could be redesigned around generative models and automation pipelines. He cast this as a way to eliminate drudgery and free people to focus on higher‑value work, but he also made clear that he sees widespread automation as essential to Nvidia’s ability to keep scaling. The leaked remarks, which surfaced in coverage of his internal comments, show him characterizing it as “insane” not to use AI wherever possible, a phrase that has since become shorthand for the intensity of his stance in reports from outlets that obtained details of the recording.
The leaked recording and Huang’s “are you insane?” challenge
The most striking detail from the internal meeting is Huang’s reported reaction to managers who tell teams to hold back on AI. In the leaked audio, he is described as asking such managers, “Are you insane?”, a line that has ricocheted across coverage of the episode and crystallized his impatience with half‑measures. That choice of words matters because it signals that, inside Nvidia, skepticism about AI tools is not just a philosophical disagreement, it is being framed as a failure of judgment by the person at the top, according to reporting that highlighted his “insane” remark.
Huang’s challenge to reluctant managers also came with assurances aimed at calming the obvious anxiety that follows any call for sweeping automation. In the same internal discussion, he is reported to have told employees that their jobs were not at risk because of AI, and that the goal was to augment human work rather than replace it outright. Coverage of the recording notes that he tried to balance his sharp criticism of AI holdouts with a promise that the company would keep investing in its people, a tension that has become central to how staff and outside observers interpret his comments in the wake of the leak described in reports on the recording.
How Nvidia is operationalizing AI in everyday work
Inside Nvidia, Huang’s directive is already being translated into concrete expectations for how teams operate. Internal guidance described in recent coverage says employees are being pushed to run routine tasks, from drafting internal documents to analyzing logs and test results, through AI systems first, then refine the output rather than starting from a blank page. That shift effectively makes generative models the front door for many workflows, with humans stepping in as editors, reviewers, and decision‑makers instead of primary producers for every piece of work.
Reports on the company’s internal practices describe a growing ecosystem of in‑house tools and pipelines that plug directly into Nvidia’s own hardware and software stack, so staff can prototype, test, and deploy AI‑driven processes without leaving the corporate environment. One account of the internal rollout notes that Huang’s order has been framed as a company‑wide “AI automation” push, with teams expected to document which tasks they have re‑engineered and what efficiency gains they are seeing, a level of structure that aligns with descriptions of the initiative in an inside look at Nvidia’s automation order.
“Use AI for every task possible”: the cultural reset
Huang’s language about using AI for “every task possible” is not just a technical roadmap, it is a cultural reset that redefines what good work looks like at Nvidia. Instead of celebrating heroic all‑nighters or manual spreadsheet wizardry, the company is signaling that the most valued employees will be those who can orchestrate AI systems to do the heavy lifting. Coverage of his internal comments emphasizes that he wants staff to treat AI as the default option, not a side experiment, a stance that has been summarized in reports on his push for employees to use AI for every task possible.
That cultural shift also affects how Nvidia presents itself to customers and partners. By turning its own workforce into power users of the technology it sells, the company is trying to demonstrate that its chips and software are not just for research labs or cloud providers but for the mundane, repetitive work that fills most corporate calendars. Analysts quoted in coverage of Huang’s remarks note that this kind of internal dogfooding can be a powerful sales tool, because it lets Nvidia point to its own productivity metrics and process changes as evidence that AI is ready for mainstream enterprise use, a theme that recurs in reporting on why the CEO wants every task automated with AI.
Automation without layoffs: Nvidia’s hiring paradox
One of the most counterintuitive aspects of Huang’s stance is that he is calling for aggressive automation at the same time Nvidia is expanding its headcount. Reporting on the company’s plans notes that it is hiring thousands of people even as it tells existing staff to hand as much work as possible to AI systems. That apparent paradox is central to Huang’s argument that automation can coexist with job growth if the company keeps opening new lines of business and deepening its technical capabilities, a point highlighted in analysis of how he can urge staff to automate every task while hiring 10,000 people.
Huang’s pitch to employees is that AI will strip out low‑value tasks and let the company redeploy people into more complex roles that are hard to codify into software. In that framing, automation is not a prelude to layoffs but a way to stretch each team further, so Nvidia can take on more projects without a linear increase in staffing. Coverage of his internal comments notes that he has been explicit about wanting to protect jobs while still demanding that staff lean into AI, a balancing act that will be tested as the company measures how much work actually disappears once models are embedded in every corner of the business.
What Huang’s stance reveals about AI’s future at work
Huang’s directive offers a preview of how other large companies might approach AI if they follow Nvidia’s lead. Instead of treating automation as a back‑office IT project, he is making it a front‑and‑center leadership priority, complete with sharp language for anyone who drags their feet. That approach suggests a future in which AI literacy becomes as fundamental as basic digital skills, with employees expected to know how to prompt, evaluate, and integrate model outputs into their daily responsibilities, a theme that surfaces repeatedly in coverage of his push to automate every task.
At the same time, Huang’s insistence that jobs are safe, even as he calls for maximum automation, underscores how politically sensitive AI adoption has become inside big employers. Workers have heard promises before about technology creating more opportunities than it destroys, and they are likely to judge Nvidia’s assurances by what actually happens to roles, promotions, and workloads over the next few years. Analysts quoted in reports on his comments argue that if Nvidia can show that employees are moving into more interesting, better‑paid work as AI takes over the grunt tasks, it will strengthen the case for similar strategies across the industry, but if staff feel squeezed instead, the backlash could be swift.
The external reaction: admiration, skepticism, and fear
Outside Nvidia, Huang’s comments have drawn a mix of admiration for his clarity and concern about what his vision means for workers elsewhere. Some observers see his stance as a logical extension of the company’s role at the center of the AI boom, arguing that if Nvidia is going to sell the hardware and platforms that power automation, it should be the first to live with the consequences internally. Coverage that pulls together reactions from employees and industry watchers notes that many technologists view his directive as a bold, if risky, attempt to align internal practice with external messaging, a perspective reflected in analysis of how he has urged employees to embrace AI in their daily work.
Others, including labor advocates and some rank‑and‑file tech workers, worry that normalizing the idea of automating “every task possible” will make it easier for less profitable or less patient companies to use AI as cover for cost‑cutting. They point out that Nvidia’s current hiring spree and strong financial position give it more room to experiment without resorting to layoffs, a cushion that many other employers do not have. Commentators quoted in coverage of the leaked recording argue that Huang’s promise to protect jobs will be closely watched, because if even a high‑margin company like Nvidia eventually uses automation to shrink teams, it will send a powerful signal to the rest of the market.
How the directive reshapes Nvidia’s management playbook
Huang’s comments do not just affect individual contributors, they also rewrite expectations for managers, who are now on the hook to champion AI use and redesign their teams’ processes. Reports on the internal meeting describe him pressing leaders to identify where their groups are still relying on manual workflows and to treat that as a problem to be solved, not a harmless quirk. That puts middle management in a new role as AI transformation agents, responsible for both coaching employees on tools and measuring the impact of automation, a responsibility that has been underscored in detailed accounts of his message to managers.
For managers, the directive also raises practical questions about performance metrics and incentives. If AI is expected to handle a growing share of routine work, leaders will need new ways to evaluate contribution that go beyond counting tasks completed or hours logged. Coverage of Nvidia’s internal shift suggests that Huang wants managers to reward employees who build and refine AI‑driven workflows, not just those who execute existing ones, which could tilt promotions and bonuses toward people who think like product designers and process engineers. That kind of change could ripple through hiring criteria, training programs, and leadership development tracks as the company adapts its management playbook to an AI‑saturated environment.
Why Huang’s mandate matters beyond Nvidia
Huang’s insistence on automating every feasible task with AI matters because Nvidia sits at the center of the global AI supply chain. The company’s graphics processing units and software platforms underpin many of the models that other firms are now testing in their own back offices, so its internal choices carry outsized symbolic weight. When the executive who runs that infrastructure tells his own staff that it is “insane” not to use AI wherever possible, it sends a clear signal to customers, competitors, and regulators about how aggressively he believes the technology should be deployed, a stance that has been widely discussed in coverage of his internal comments.
For other executives watching from the sidelines, Nvidia’s experiment offers a real‑world case study in what happens when a large, complex organization tries to rewire itself around AI in a short period of time. If the company can maintain its hiring plans, keep employees engaged, and show measurable productivity gains from its automation push, it will strengthen the argument that AI can be a net positive for both shareholders and workers. If, instead, the initiative leads to burnout, confusion, or quiet job cuts, it will reinforce fears that “AI‑first” is just a new label for old‑fashioned cost reduction. Either way, Huang’s directive has turned Nvidia into a bellwether for the next phase of AI at work, a role that is already being scrutinized in detailed reporting on how he has framed the automation order to his own teams.
More from MorningOverview