Shortly before 10 a.m. on July 23, 2024, a violent hydrothermal blast ripped through Biscuit Basin in Yellowstone, hurling mud and steam into a towering plume estimated at 400 to 600 feet high. The explosion injured one person and forced rangers to close part of the boardwalk, instantly feeding social media claims that the Yellowstone supervolcano was waking up. The monitoring data tell a different story: scientists say the volcanic system remained at background levels, even as attention shifted to a string of recent quakes, uplift and geyser changes.
So is the Yellowstone supervolcano getting ready to erupt? Based on what I found in official monitoring reports and scientific assessments, the answer is no. The recent activity fits a long pattern of restless but normal behavior, and the instruments that would spot early warning signs of a true eruption are not seeing them.
Recent Events Fueling Eruption Rumors
The July 23 blast at Biscuit Basin was dramatic enough that the Official incident record from Yellowstone describes it as a hydrothermal explosion that struck around 10:19 a.m., injured one visitor and prompted an immediate closure around the damaged boardwalk. In a joint message, the USGS and NPS said that despite the spectacle, their monitoring data showed no broader changes in Yellowstone and that the volcanic system remained at background levels. A separate Primary USGS account of the event adds that the plume rose between 400 and 600 feet and that instruments detected no precursors in the minutes before the blast, reinforcing the conclusion that this was a local hydrothermal event, not the start of a magmatic eruption.
Hydrothermal unrest did not stop there. On December 21, 2025, a muddy eruption at Black Diamond Pool in Biscuit Basin drew new attention when it was captured on cameras and quickly circulated online. Coverage that cited Major reporting on Black Diamond Pool explained that USGS experts attributed the activity to the hydrothermal system and noted that a webcam, seismic and acoustic instruments, and temperature sensor equipment had been installed to watch the pool more closely. The Official YVO monthly update for early 2026 confirms two eruptions at Black Diamond Pool in Biscuit Basin and places them in the context of routine hydrothermal variability. That same update, based on data from the University of Utah, reports that Utah analysts located 100 earthquakes in January 2026, including two small swarms with maximum magnitudes of M1.8 and M2.1, while stressing that Yellowstone seismicity remained at background levels.
Understanding Yellowstone’s Supervolcano
To understand why these events do not mean a supereruption is imminent, it helps to be clear about what Yellowstone actually is. The volcanic system is a large caldera-forming complex that has produced very rare, very large eruptions in the distant past. According to a USGS FAQ on Yellowstone, the last such supereruption occurred about 640,000 years ago. That same FAQ addresses the popular idea that Yellowstone is “overdue” and states plainly that there is no evidence a catastrophic eruption is imminent and that such caldera-scale events are unlikely in the next few centuries.
Most of what visitors see today is not magma erupting but hot water and steam circulating through fractured rock. A separate USGS FAQ on eruption types explains that the most likely hazardous events at Yellowstone are hydrothermal explosions or relatively small lava flows, not a caldera-forming supereruption. Another USGS summary that Clarifies the likely hazards states that small hydrothermal explosions occur every few years, while larger craters form every few thousand years, and that USGS has not detected any signs suggesting an eruption is on the way. In other words, the sort of muddy blast seen at Black Diamond Pool fits the expected pattern of hydrothermal activity in a living but not imminently erupting system.
How Scientists Monitor the Volcano
Reassurances about Yellowstone are not based on guesswork. They rest on a dense monitoring network run by the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory, or YVO, a consortium of agencies described in a technical blueprint for the system. That USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2022-5032 lays out how Yellowstone is watched using seismic networks, continuous GPS, satellite-based InSAR, gas measurements, hydrothermal sensors and lake and hydrology observations. It also notes governance by YVO partner agencies and planned expansions such as additional GPS instruments near Norris, more continuous gas monitoring and improved hydrothermal surveillance, all designed to catch subtle changes in the magmatic and hydrothermal systems.
These methods are not theoretical. The same report explains how GPS stations in and around Yellowstone track millimeter-scale motions of the ground, while seismic stations record thousands of small earthquakes each year that map out active faults and fluid pathways. The Authoritative USGS analysis of the Norris Uplift Anomaly describes how GPS measurement at stations such as P711 and NRWY, along with a semipermanent GPS site near the caldera center, are used to follow uplift and subsidence episodes in near real time. Together with gas and thermal sensors, this network gives scientists multiple independent ways to check whether magma is moving toward the surface.
Current Monitoring Data and Status
With that network in place, the key question becomes what those instruments are seeing now. The USGS Volcano Hazards Program status page lists Yellowstone at Normal, or Green, the lowest alert level used for volcanoes. In its narrative for January 2026, the USGS reports two small earthquake swarms between January 4 and 9, with a maximum magnitude of M1.8, and on January 26, with a maximum magnitude of M2.1, and concludes that earthquake activity remains at background levels. The same update notes that these swarms are typical of Yellowstone and do not indicate that magma is rising toward the surface.
Ground deformation data tell a similar story of restless normality. An Authoritative USGS and YVO write-up on uplift along the north rim of the Yellowstone caldera describes how GPS stations have recorded subtle motion since July 2025. According to that analysis, GPS at station P711 moved about 1 centimeter westward by the end of 2025, while a semipermanent GPS near the caldera center, labeled BRYL, rose about 2 centimeters between July and late September 2025. The Official YVO February 2026 update adds that other GPS sites, including NRWY, show similar small-scale motion and that, overall, the north caldera rim is experiencing subtle uplift while the main caldera floor continues a long-term pattern of subsidence. Crucially, USGS scientists say they do not see the kind of rapid, accelerating deformation across multiple instrument types that would signal magma forcing its way upward.
What Precursors Would Look Like and Why No Imminent Threat
Scientists are not simply hoping they would recognize an impending eruption. The USGS FAQ on Yellowstone spells out the kinds of precursors they expect before a large event: strong and persistent earthquake swarms, rapid and widespread ground deformation and coordinated changes across several monitoring systems, including gas emissions and hydrothermal features. That FAQ emphasizes that none of these multi-parameter changes are occurring and reiterates that there is no evidence a catastrophic eruption is imminent and that such events are unlikely for the next few centuries.
The same perspective appears in USGS explanations that Clarifies the relative risks at Yellowstone. Those summaries state that the most probable future activity would be either small lava flows or hydrothermal explosions, not a caldera-forming supereruption, and that no monitoring data currently point toward any eruption. The FAQ on eruption types notes that small hydrothermal explosions happen every few years and that larger craters form every few thousand years, which matches the kind of localized blasts recorded at Biscuit Basin and Black Diamond Pool. In other words, the system is active, but the signals scientists associate with an escalating magmatic crisis are absent.
Implications for Visitors and Long-Term Risks
For visitors, the immediate implications are more about local safety than global catastrophe. After the Biscuit Basin explosion, the Official Yellowstone incident report details how rangers closed boardwalk sections around the new hydrothermal feature, both to protect people from unstable ground and to give scientists space to observe the changes. The Major coverage of Black Diamond Pool describes how webcams and sensor arrays now watch that pool, making it easier for USGS and park staff to respond quickly if activity increases. These targeted closures and monitoring upgrades mean that while certain spots can become hazardous with little warning, managers have tools to keep most visitors out of harm’s way.
Longer term, Yellowstone remains a dynamic volcano that will erupt again in some form, but the best scientific assessments argue that the likeliest scenarios involve small lava flows or hydrothermal blasts rather than a civilization-ending supereruption. Broader explainers on what the Yellowstone supervolcano is and how it behaves, along with pieces that separate eruption truth from online rumors, echo the USGS message that current activity is within historical norms. Other science outlets, including analyses of where future eruptions might occur and how a large event could unfold compared with other systems such as Italy’s own supervolcano, stress that constant monitoring and careful hazard planning matter far more than viral speculation. Even scenario-driven pieces that imagine how a supervolcano explosion would unfold rely on the same core point visible in the data today: Yellowstone is active, closely watched and, at present, not showing the signs scientists would expect if a major eruption were on the horizon.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
