Immigrations and Customs Enforcement is facing a new wave of scrutiny after a Houston-area 10th grader said agents took his phone while he filmed an arrest, then appeared to sell it for quick cash. The allegation, involving 16-year-old U.S. citizen Arnoldo Bazan, lands on top of mounting evidence that ICE agents are using banned chokeholds and other aggressive tactics on people who have every right to be in the country. Together, the accounts paint a picture of an agency that treats constitutional rights and basic property protections as optional.
At the center of the story is not just a missing smartphone, but a teenager who says he was choked, ignored when he protested that he was underage and a citizen, and then left to discover that his device had apparently been pawned. The idea that federal officers could seize a minor’s phone outside any formal process, then convert it into personal profit, raises hard questions about corruption, accountability, and how far ICE culture has drifted from the rules it is supposed to follow.
The Houston confrontation that started with a chokehold and ended at a pawn shop
The confrontation began when 16-year-old Arnoldo Bazan watched ICE agents tackle and choke his father outside their home in the Houston area. As the arrest unfolded, Bazan, a U.S. citizen and a 10th grader, began recording on his phone, a step that is generally protected when people document law enforcement in public. According to his account, the situation escalated when agents turned on him, putting hands on his neck even as he tried to assert that he was underage and a citizen, a detail later highlighted in coverage of the Houston incident.
What happened next is what pushed the story into national outrage territory. Bazan says agents took his phone during the scuffle and never logged it as evidence or returned it through any official channel. Instead, the device later surfaced at a pawn shop, where records appeared to show it had been sold for cash, a sequence that reporting on Immigrations and Customs has traced through the family’s efforts to track it down. For a teenager already dealing with his father’s arrest and removal to Mexico, the discovery that his phone had apparently been flipped for money by the very agents who took it added a layer of betrayal that goes beyond a single lost piece of property.
A viral allegation of theft and a pattern of banned chokeholds
The story might have remained a local outrage if not for the way it ricocheted across social media. A widely shared post described how ICE “goons” allegedly choked out a U.S. citizen 10th grader, stole his cellphone after he filmed them, and then “SOLD IT” for personal profit, language that captured the raw anger behind the BREAKING allegation. The post framed the episode not as a bureaucratic mistake but as outright theft by federal officers, and it resonated with people who have watched similar videos of aggressive immigration enforcement.
Those concerns are amplified by separate reporting that immigration agents have been using chokeholds that the Department of Homeland Security formally banned in 2023. Investigators documented multiple cases in which officers put people in dangerous neck restraints, including one incident where a person began filming on his phone and was met with force, a pattern detailed in an examination of how They also continued to use such tactics despite the policy change. When a banned chokehold and a suspicious property seizure show up in the same encounter, it suggests not a one-off lapse but a culture that treats both physical and legal boundaries as negotiable.
From confiscation to cash: what the phone’s disappearance suggests about ICE culture
On its face, the idea that ICE agents would seize a teenager’s phone and then sell it sounds almost too brazen to be real. Yet the reporting that tracks Bazan’s device from his hands to a pawn shop counter lays out a plausible chain of custody that is hard to dismiss. Accounts of the case describe how the phone vanished after the encounter, then appeared in records at a local shop, where it had been pawned for money, a sequence that coverage of how ICE agents Reportedly Stole the device has pieced together from the family’s search.
Commentary on the case has noted that the alleged resale of the phone is not even the most disturbing part of the story, but it is the detail that crystallizes the sense of impunity. One tech journalist pointed out that the shocking part is not the dollar value of the device but the casual way agents appeared to treat someone’s personal property as a perk of the job, an attitude summarized in analysis of how “the idea of ICE stealing and then selling somebody’s phone is jarring” in coverage that also recounts how Bazan’s father is now in Mexico and how advocates stress that “They’re Citizens,” a phrase highlighted in a They’re Citizens discussion.
A teenager’s rights, a father in Mexico, and the limits of accountability
For Bazan, the fallout is deeply personal. His father, who was tackled and choked in front of him, is now in Mexico, leaving the 16-year-old to navigate both the emotional shock and the practical consequences of the arrest. Reporting on the case emphasizes that he tried to assert his status as a U.S. citizen and a minor in the moment, only to be ignored, a detail that underscores how little weight those words carried once ICE agents decided to treat the family as targets rather than rights-bearing individuals, a dynamic laid out in accounts of how ICE reportedly handled the encounter.
From a legal perspective, the alleged theft of the phone raises questions that go beyond internal discipline. If agents took a citizen’s property outside any warrant process, then converted it into cash, that behavior would look less like a policy violation and more like a criminal act. Yet the path to accountability is murky, especially when the same agency that employs the officers is often the first line of investigation. Coverage of the case notes that the most damning evidence so far has come not from official channels but from the family’s own detective work and from journalists who have connected the dots between the chokehold, the missing phone, and the pawn shop records, a pattern that has been explored in analysis of how ICE Reportedly allowed the situation to unfold.
Why Bazan’s story resonates with other ICE encounters under the microscope
Bazan’s account is landing at a moment when other communities are already documenting what they see as out-of-control behavior by ICE. In Minneapolis, two Army combat veteran sisters, Azar and Kane, have been filming immigration operations in their neighborhood, saying their military training taught them to stay cool under pressure while the agents they watch are “not acting cool under pressure” at all. Kane told local NBC affiliate KARE that their concerns rose as they realized that the kind of conduct they associated with war zones was now “here in our streets,” a warning that has put a sharper microscope on Kane and her sister’s footage.
When I look at Bazan’s story alongside those Minneapolis videos and the broader reporting on banned chokeholds, a pattern comes into focus. The Houston case resurfaced in that context, with commentators noting that the same agents who are not supposed to be using neck restraints are also accused of casually pocketing a teenager’s phone and treating it as a personal asset, a connection drawn in coverage that framed the episode as part of a larger trend of agents who are “not applying” the rules that are supposed to govern them, including in the But when analysis of Bazan’s case. For an agency already under fire, the image of a 10th grader choked, stripped of his phone, and then watching that phone reappear in a pawn shop is not just a public relations problem. It is a test of whether the systems that oversee ICE can still draw a line between aggressive enforcement and outright abuse.
More from Morning Overview