A peer-reviewed study of 64,988 U.S. college students has drawn a sharp line between heavy social media use and loneliness, defining “excessive” as 16 or more hours per week. The research, drawn from more than 120 colleges and published in the Journal of American College Health, found that roughly 13 percent of students aged 18 to 24 crossed that threshold, and those who did reported higher levels of loneliness than their peers. The findings land at a moment when universities are wrestling with a student mental health crisis and looking for concrete risk factors they can actually address.
What 64,988 Students Revealed About Screen Time
The study is a secondary analysis of data collected during the Fall 2022 and Spring 2023 cycles of the American College Health Association’s National College Health Assessment, one of the largest recurring surveys of student well-being in the country. Researchers at the University of Cincinnati drew on responses from tens of thousands of students to isolate social media behavior and test its statistical relationship with self-reported loneliness, applying both unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models to control for confounding variables. The sheer size of the sample, spanning 120-plus institutions, gives the results a statistical weight that smaller campus surveys cannot match and allows for more confidence that the patterns observed are not due to chance alone.
The 16-hour weekly cutoff is not arbitrary. It translates to roughly 2.3 hours of social media use every day, a figure that sits well above the national average for adults but is increasingly common among younger users who toggle between platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Snapchat throughout the day. According to the doctoral abstract underlying the published paper, approximately 13 percent of students in the sample met this threshold for excessive use. That minority reported meaningfully higher loneliness, even after the researchers adjusted for demographic and behavioral variables that might otherwise explain the gap, such as age, gender, living situation, and overall health status.
Correlation Is Not Causation, but the Pattern Is Hard to Ignore
The most common critique of research like this is that it cannot prove direction. Do students scroll more because they already feel lonely, or does the scrolling itself erode their sense of connection? The study’s cross-sectional design, a snapshot of one period rather than a longitudinal tracking of change over time, cannot answer that question definitively. The researchers acknowledged this limitation, and the full text of the dissertation remains embargoed until May 2026, meaning the broader academic community has not yet been able to scrutinize every analytic choice in detail. Still, the adjusted logistic models strengthen the case that the association is not simply an artifact of age, gender, or other obvious confounders, and they suggest that high levels of social media use may be a meaningful marker of risk even if it is not the root cause.
This new work builds on a body of evidence that has been accumulating for nearly a decade. A widely cited 2017 study in the preventive medicine literature established an earlier U.S. baseline, linking social media engagement measures with perceived social isolation among young adults. That earlier research used a different but related construct, social isolation rather than loneliness, and a different survey instrument, but the directional finding was the same: heavier use tracked with feeling more cut off from others. The consistency across studies, methodologies, and time periods makes the pattern harder to dismiss as a statistical fluke, even if the causal mechanism remains debated and may involve a complex mix of displacement of offline time, social comparison, and algorithm-driven exposure to content that reinforces negative mood.
Why the 16-Hour Threshold Matters for Campuses
For university administrators, the practical value of a defined threshold is that it converts a vague concern into something measurable. Telling students that “too much social media is bad” has little traction. Telling them that crossing 16 hours a week is statistically associated with loneliness gives counseling centers and residence life staff a concrete number to reference in programming and outreach. The peer-reviewed article in the Journal of American College Health provides that anchor point, and its publication in a journal specifically aimed at campus health professionals increases the likelihood that the finding will filter into institutional policy discussions rather than sit in an academic archive. For example, wellness screenings could incorporate a simple question about weekly social media hours, flagging students who cross the threshold for follow-up.
There is a risk, however, of oversimplifying the takeaway. A student who spends 16 hours a week on social media for creative work, community organizing, or maintaining long-distance friendships may have a very different experience than one who passively scrolls through content from strangers. The study’s data, drawn from the ACHA-NCHA survey, measures total time rather than type of engagement, a distinction that matters enormously for anyone trying to design an intervention. Campuses that respond by simply telling students to “log off” may miss the point. The more useful question, and one that future research will need to address, is which patterns of use within those 16-plus hours are most strongly tied to feeling alone, and whether targeted changes (such as limiting nighttime scrolling or curbing passive consumption) might reduce loneliness without demanding that students abandon the platforms altogether.
Cannabis, Loneliness, and Overlapping Risk Profiles
One less-discussed dimension of the University of Cincinnati research is that the broader project also examined cannabis use alongside excessive social media use within the same student population. The pairing is not coincidental. Both behaviors can function as solitary coping mechanisms, and the overlap in the dataset suggests that students who use social media excessively may share risk profiles with those who turn to substances. This does not mean one causes the other, but it implies that campus interventions targeting loneliness might benefit from addressing multiple behavioral patterns simultaneously rather than treating social media use in isolation. Integrated screening tools, for instance, could ask about both digital habits and cannabis consumption when students present with mood or adjustment problems.
The cannabis findings also underscore the importance of context when interpreting any single risk factor. A student who uses marijuana occasionally in social settings may not resemble one who uses it daily to manage stress, just as a student who spends hours online building supportive communities may not resemble one who scrolls to numb difficult feelings. Yet when these behaviors cluster together at high levels, they can signal a broader pattern of disengagement from offline life. Recognizing that pattern gives campus health teams an opportunity to intervene earlier, ideally with supportive services that address underlying loneliness rather than focusing narrowly on the behaviors themselves.
Reading the Fine Print: What We Know and What We Don’t
The embargo on the full dissertation means that, for now, outside researchers must rely on the published article and institutional summaries rather than combing through every model specification. The OhioLINK guidance explains how and why some graduate theses are temporarily restricted, and this project falls into that category until May 2026. In practice, that delay slows the usual process of replication and critique that helps refine scientific understanding. It also leaves some open questions about subgroup differences (for example, whether the association between social media use and loneliness is stronger for first-year students, commuter students, or those living off campus).
Even with those caveats, the available evidence offers campuses a usable starting point. The Journal of American College Health paper, accessible both through its primary digital identifier and through publisher platforms, lays out a clear, quantifiable relationship between time spent on social media and reported loneliness among nearly 65,000 students. When paired with earlier national work on social isolation and digital engagement, it suggests that universities ignore heavy social media use at their peril. The challenge now is to translate these statistical signals into practical steps (routine screening, nuanced education about online habits, and integrated mental health supports) that recognize social media as one thread in a larger tapestry of student well-being rather than the sole culprit or a problem that can be solved with a simple command to unplug.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
