Tesla’s Giga Press has turned the factory floor into the real battleground of the electric‑vehicle transition, shifting the contest from battery chemistry to how fast and cheaply a car can be built. By turning what used to be dozens of welded and stamped parts into a handful of giant aluminum castings, Tesla has quietly rewritten the economics of EV manufacturing. The result is a structural advantage that rivals are racing to copy but are still struggling to match.
Instead of treating gigacasting as a flashy sideshow, it is more accurate to see it as the EV equivalent of the move from hand‑wired circuit boards to integrated chips. When a single machine can spit out a car’s underbody like a one‑piece “aluminum pancake,” the entire cost stack, supply chain and product roadmap start to look different.
The physics of a factory advantage
At the heart of Tesla’s lead is a simple idea executed at extreme scale: inject a huge slug of molten aluminum into a precision mold and form a structural part in one shot. A typical Giga Press is described as a series of high‑pressure aluminum die casting machines where Molten aluminum weighing more than 100 kg is injected into molds and rapidly solidified. Other analyses describe the process more broadly as using over 80 kilograms, or 176 pounds, of aluminum per shot, underscoring just how far this is from conventional die casting of small brackets and housings.
The payoff is a radical reduction in complexity. One technical review notes that Each Gigacasting can cut the part count by 30 to 40 components compared with traditional stamped assemblies. Another assessment of Tesla’s approach highlights that about 500 castings can be produced per day from a single line, with fewer welds and joints improving stiffness and enabling increased range for electric vehicles. For a mass‑market car, that is the difference between a factory that is always chasing bottlenecks and one that can scale like a chip fab.
Why rivals are scrambling to copy Tesla’s playbook
Once Tesla proved that giant castings could underpin mainstream models, the rest of the industry had little choice but to follow. Analysts tracking the sector describe the rising adoption of aluminum gigacasting modules and structural parts as being driven by the need to prevent the continuous cost creep that has plagued EV programs, with manufacturers looking to simplify body structures and reduce labor through gigacasting. Tesla and Chinese EV makers now lead this push, with their pressing machines capable of applying 9,000 tonnes of clamping force, and some suppliers already revealing machines at the 10,000‑tonne level.
Honda’s recent megacasting demonstrations show how quickly the idea is spreading. Engineers there have highlighted that a battery case made from steel would require assembling more than 60 pieces, while an aluminum megacast can reduce that to just five, using the same kind of high‑tonnage presses. For legacy brands that have spent decades optimizing spot welds and stampings, the message is blunt: either retool around these new machines or risk being permanently stuck with higher unit costs than Tesla.
The hidden cost of joining the arms race
Copying the concept is one thing, matching Tesla’s economics is another. A technical review of the equipment puts the price of a GIGA press with a clamping force of 16,000 tons at USD 18 Mio, with molds costing up to USD 4 Mio and a lifetime of around 100,000 shots, or roughly one year of intensive production. That kind of capital outlay is manageable if a company is running multiple high‑volume models through the same architecture, but it is punishing for smaller players that might only build tens of thousands of vehicles annually.
Even for giants, the transition is not plug‑and‑play. Analysts note that, unlike Tesla’s gigacasting production model, which is characterized by an in‑house approach involving substantial greenfield investments, most other automakers are relying on external suppliers to construct their own gigacasting facilities. That adds layers of coordination risk and can slow down iteration. It also helps explain why some mid‑tier EV makers, including those discussed in Yes online debates, have hesitated to commit to Giga Press‑scale investments despite recognizing the potential efficiency gains.
Suppliers, pumps and the fine print of Tesla’s edge
Tesla’s head start is not just about buying big machines, it is about how those machines are integrated into a tightly controlled ecosystem. Several companies make gigacasting equipment, including Bühler, IDRA and LK Machinery, and Switzerland’s Bühler and China’s LK Group are now key players in this niche. Tesla was the first company in the world to implement the Giga Press in its manufacturing facilities, turning what initially seemed like a risky experiment into a template that suppliers now market to everyone else.
The company has also pushed into process tweaks that are harder to copy quickly. One casting specialist describes how electromagnetic pumps increase Giga Press efficiency and reduce waste, with the hyper‑efficiency of gigacasting and its ability to simplify the production line allowing Lower Cost manufacturing for Tesla. At Giga Texas, where a recent video described what may be the biggest change in the history of Giga Texas production as Musk prepares to eliminate massive numbers of parts, those kinds of incremental gains compound into a structural moat. It is the manufacturing equivalent of shaving milliseconds off a high‑frequency trading algorithm.
From Cybertruck to 2027: how far can the lead stretch?
The clearest real‑world test bed for this strategy is the Cybertruck. A technical review of giga‑castings notes that the Cybertruck giga‑castings, produced in the Texas plant, have been found to require only a small number of additional parts and minimal post‑processing. That kind of simplification does not just cut labor, it also reduces potential failure points and can improve crash performance by making the load paths more predictable. It is a reminder that gigacasting is as much a design philosophy as a factory trick.
There is also a broader industry implication. One analysis argues that Tesla’s Giga Presses have led to systemic change and that mega‑castings in use today could help EVs cost less to build than internal‑combustion vehicles by 2027, with EVs benefiting from fewer parts and shorter assembly lines. Combined with commentary that Tesla has historically been the only automaker outside China making electric vehicles profitably at scale, this suggests that the company’s casting lead could translate into a multi‑year pricing advantage, especially in the mass‑market segments that are most sensitive to a few hundred dollars of cost.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
