Weighing a single living cell sounds like a party trick, yet the numbers involved are so small that they push the limits of physics and engineering. To make sense of a weight like 3.5e-14 ounces, I need to translate it into grams, compare it with what biologists know about typical cells, and then look at the tools that can actually measure something that light.
Behind that tiny figure lies a surprisingly rich story: how researchers define the “average” cell, how they convert between units that span from everyday ounces to nanograms, and how new instruments can watch a cell’s mass change in real time as it grows, divides, or even responds to drugs.
From ounces to grams: decoding 3.5e-14 oz
The first step in understanding how much 3.5e-14 ounces represents is to move into the metric system, where cell biology usually lives. Standard conversion tables put 1 ounce at exactly 28.3495231 grams, so 3.5e-14 ounces works out to roughly 9.9e-13 grams, or just under a trillionth of a gram, once I multiply by that factor and shift the decimal places using the same logic laid out in a detailed Solution for ounce to gram conversions.
At that scale, it becomes more natural to talk in scientific notation and metric prefixes than in kitchen units. Converting 9.9e-13 grams into nanograms gives about 0.00099 nanograms, and into picograms it is close to 0.99 picograms, which is essentially 1 picogram. That means 3.5e-14 ounces is on the order of a single bacterial cell, far below the mass of a typical human or mammalian cell, and only a tiny fraction of the weight of a grain of sand.
What biologists call an “average” cell
Biologists often need a ballpark figure for the mass of a generic cell, and several lines of evidence converge on a value around a billionth of a gram. A curated database of cellular measurements lists an Estimated mean weight of a mammalian cell at about 1 nanogram, with that entry’s header explicitly giving the Value as 1 ng and pointing to a specific Reference by Bia that underpins this widely used rule of thumb.
That 1 nanogram estimate also shows up in more informal contexts, such as a worked problem in which a human cell is taken to weigh approximately 1.0 × 10^(-9) gram while a human body is set at 6.2 × 10^4 grams, letting students calculate how many cells that implies for a person of that mass, as laid out in a step-by-step Solved Math example that uses the figure 6.2 explicitly. Compared with that 1 nanogram benchmark, the 0.00099 nanograms behind 3.5e-14 ounces is about a thousand times lighter, which is why it lines up better with bacteria or yeast than with human tissue cells.
Why nanograms and picograms matter
Once the numbers shrink below a millionth of a gram, the usual units of grams and kilograms start to lose their intuitive grip. In the metric system, the prefix “nano” means 10^(-9), so 1 nanogram is exactly 0.000000001 grams, a relationship spelled out in a primer on metric prefixes that notes that Nano is the abbreviation for 10^(-9) and that 1 ng equals 0.000000001 g.
For even smaller masses, biologists and physicists move to picograms, which are 10^(-12) grams, and sometimes to daltons when they talk about individual molecules. A discussion of why researchers prefer daltons for proteins notes that Grams and kilograms work best for macroscopic things, while Once you are dealing with cells, tissues, or organisms at microscopic scales, it becomes more practical to use units that keep the numbers in a manageable range. In that context, a 1 picogram cell is a comfortable, intuitive figure for a bacterium, while a 1 nanogram cell is a similarly tidy number for a mammalian cell.
How experimentalists actually weigh a single cell
Knowing that a cell weighs around a picogram or a nanogram is one thing, but measuring that mass directly is a much harder task. One elegant approach uses a tiny vibrating beam called a suspended microchannel resonator, where a cell flows through a hollow channel inside the beam and slightly shifts its vibration frequency, a design that has been described in detail as a Liquid-filled device with a thin, hollow channel carved through a microscopic cantilever.
Another family of instruments uses a cantilever that physically holds the cell and tracks how its weight changes the way the structure oscillates. In one such setup, the cell hangs on the underside of a tiny cantilever, and a laser focused on that microscopic cantilever induces it to oscillate slightly, with the resulting motion revealing the cell’s mass, as described in a report that quotes doctoral student Gotthold Fl explaining that the cell hangs on the underside of the cantilever for the measurement. These devices can detect changes in mass on the order of a few femtograms, which is what makes it possible to resolve a weight like 3.5e-14 ounces in the first place.
Watching cells fall to read their mass
Not every method relies on sophisticated microfabricated beams. One clever experiment used gravity and fluid drag to infer the mass of yeast cells by watching how fast they sank. In that work, the scientists propped their microscope slides upright and filmed yeast cells drifting downwards in sugar water, then used the balance between gravity and drag to back-calculate the cells’ density and mass, a setup described in detail in a feature that walks through how the researchers set up the sinking experiment and asks, Sep what this reveals about cell weight.
In that yeast study, the team averaged over close to 70 different cells and found that the typical yeast cell mass was around 79 picograms, a result that came from Averaging over close to 70 cells and arriving at a mass of 79 picograms per cell using an equation invented 180 years ago. That 79 picogram figure is roughly eighty times heavier than the 1 picogram implied by 3.5e-14 ounces, which again highlights that the headline number is closer to a very small bacterium than to a yeast cell.
Turning still images and videos into scales
Some of the most striking recent work on cell mass uses nothing more exotic than a camera, a microscope, and some clever physics. In one experiment, researchers took still photos of cells and used the images to measure the distance each cell traveled over a fixed time, which let them determine the radius of each cell and, combined with assumptions about density, infer its mass, a process described in a narrative that begins with the phrase From the photos and explains how those measurements were made as recently as 2022.
Another account of the same work emphasizes how those still images and videos can be used to calculate a cell’s diameter and then its volume, which in turn yields its mass if you know or assume its density, with the description again starting From the photos and walking through the steps. A related explanation aimed at weighing a single E. coli cell notes that by using the video, you can figure out its speed and, if you assume the cell is roughly spherical, combine that with the fluid’s properties to calculate its mass, although this approach only works for spherical cells, as spelled out in a practical guide that begins with the words Using the video to infer speed.
Precision instruments that track growth in real time
While these imaging tricks are powerful, some of the most precise measurements of single-cell mass come from purpose-built instruments that can detect changes of just a few femtograms. At ETH Zurich, a team working with Christoph Gerber and Sascha Martin developed a new cell scale with high resolution that can weigh individual living cells and follow their mass over time, a device described as a New cell scale with high resolution that emerged from a collaboration involving Christoph Gerber and Sascha Martin.
In that work, the cells, which usually weigh only a few nanograms, are placed on a tiny cantilever that can detect mass changes of just a few picograms, allowing researchers to see how a single cell’s weight fluctuates as it grows or responds to its environment, as described in a report that notes that The cells, which usually weigh only a few nanograms, can now be monitored in real time using experiments with the new scale. That level of sensitivity is more than enough to resolve a mass like 3.5e-14 ounces and to track how it changes second by second.
What cell weight reveals about growth and health
Once you can weigh a single cell with that kind of precision, you can start to ask deeper biological questions about how cells grow and regulate their size. Work at MIT using a cell-mass sensor showed that, rather than diverging wildly, cells generally even out in size over time through a mechanism that biologists do not yet fully understand, with the device itself described as a cell-mass sensor built into a silicon slab that vibrates inside a vacuum, as detailed in a report that begins with the word Instead and goes on to describe the silicon slab that vibrates inside a vacuum.
These kinds of measurements also open the door to medical applications, such as monitoring how cancer cells respond to drugs by watching their mass change, or tracking how immune cells bulk up when they are activated. To get those insights, researchers need both the raw mass data and the context of how cells behave in populations, which is why some teams combine single-cell weighing with imaging and flow-based methods like the ones where They, the pair of microbiologists, filmed cells sinking through liquid to infer their mass and then compared those results with other techniques.
Putting 3.5e-14 oz in perspective
When I translate 3.5e-14 ounces into the language of cell biology, it lands at roughly 1 picogram, which is a plausible mass for a small bacterium or a very light single-celled organism. That figure is about a thousand times lighter than the 1 nanogram average for a mammalian cell, dozens of times lighter than the 79 picogram yeast cells measured in sinking experiments, and still unimaginably small compared with everyday objects, yet it is squarely within the range that modern instruments can detect.
The trick to weighing something that light is not magic but a combination of careful unit conversions, a clear sense of what counts as “average” for different kinds of cells, and a suite of tools that translate tiny shifts in vibration, motion, or fluid drag into mass. From the suspended microchannel resonator that channels Liquid through a vibrating beam to the high resolution cantilevers developed with Christoph Gerber and Sascha Martin, the technology has finally caught up with the question. A single cell may weigh only 3.5e-14 ounces, but with the right physics and engineering, that is more than enough to register on a scale.
More from MorningOverview