The world now has its first global rulebook for the open ocean, a legal framework that supporters say could finally put real limits on exploitation in waters beyond national control. The High Seas Treaty has entered into force as international law, hailed as a historic moment for marine protection, but its success will depend on how quickly governments turn lofty promises into patrol boats, protected zones and hard choices about what must stop.
I see the treaty as a genuine turning point, yet not a magic fix. It closes some of the most glaring gaps in ocean governance, while leaving big questions about money, enforcement and political will that will decide whether it can actually change the trajectory of the seas.
What the High Seas Treaty actually does
At its core, the High Seas Treaty is designed to govern areas beyond national jurisdiction, the vast swaths of ocean that lie outside any country’s exclusive economic zone. These high seas are described as our planet’s international waters and they cover nearly half of the planet’s ocean, a space that has long been treated as a frontier for fishing, shipping and emerging industries like deep sea mining with minimal oversight. The High Seas Treaty is meant to change that by creating common rules for conservation and sustainable use.
Formally known as the Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction, the pact, often shortened to the BBNJ Agreement, sets out four main pillars. It covers Marine genetic resources and benefit sharing, tools like environmental impact assessments, capacity building and technology transfer, and, crucially, the creation of new ocean sanctuaries. Earlier this year, advocates celebrated when over 60 ratifications triggered its entry into force, turning years of negotiation into binding obligations.
Why campaigners call it “historic”
Supporters are not exaggerating when they describe this as a historic leap for ocean protection. In New York, groups marking the moment said Today the High Seas Treaty brings new responsibilities that come into effect immediately, signalling that the era of treating the high seas as a lawless expanse is supposed to be over. Another organisation stressed that Today the High represents a major step for multilateral cooperation on ocean protection, not just a symbolic gesture.
Environmental advocates have framed the agreement as a chance to end what one group called an era of exploitation on the open ocean. They argue that UN High Seas, as the first international treaty to regulate the ocean beyond national jurisdiction, can help prevent the collapse of marine ecosystems that underpin all life on Earth. The United Nations Environment Programme echoed that sentiment, calling it a historic moment for the ocean and linking it to broader goals of global cooperation and environmental stewardship.
Marine protected areas and the 30×30 test
The most concrete promise of the treaty is its new framework for Marine Protected Areas in international waters. For the first time, countries have a shared process to propose, negotiate and adopt sanctuaries on the high seas, which make up about two thirds of the global ocean. The agreement creates the first mechanism to designate Marine Protected Areas beyond national borders, and that framework can start operating immediately now that the treaty is in force.
This matters because governments have already pledged to protect 30 percent of land and sea by 2030, a target often shortened to 30×30. Conservation scientists point out that you cannot reach 30×30 without protecting the high seas, since Nearly half of the planet’s ocean lies beyond national jurisdiction. One advocacy group put it bluntly, saying You cannot reach 30×30 without protecting the High Seas, and they have framed the treaty as a historic tool to get there.
From legal text to life in the water
Turning legal language into real change in the water will be the hard part. The treaty is now international law, and one analysis notes that High Seas Treaty with immediate obligations for states that have ratified it. Yet several major economies have not yet joined, and the United Nations has highlighted that Several key ocean players, including The US, have not ratified, which risks uneven enforcement across international waters.
Even among countries that have signed on, there are structural hurdles. Analysts have flagged Institutional limitations in how the treaty will sit alongside existing law of the sea rules, and they warn that Major Challenges include Unequal Capabilities between states. Developing countries often lack access to marine technologies for monitoring and enforcement, which could leave them dependent on wealthier navies and research fleets to police their own rights.
What changes for people, not just fish
For all the focus on whales and sea turtles, the treaty is also about food security and climate stability. One explainer notes that from our tables to our climate, the ocean is central to human life, and it highlights how Common two-banded seabream fish swim in the protected area of France‘s Porquerolles National Park as a glimpse of what effective protection can look like. The same report describes coral reefs as the rainforests of the sea, underscoring that safeguarding biodiversity is not a luxury but a foundation for fisheries and coastal economies, and it illustrates this with Common species that depend on intact habitats.
The treaty also reaches into cutting edge science and industry by regulating marine genetic resources, which can be used in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and biotechnology. A detailed overview of Marine genetic resources explains that the agreement is meant to ensure fair and equitable sharing of benefits, so that discoveries in the deep ocean do not simply enrich a handful of corporations or countries. That same analysis of What the High Seas Treaty and Why it is Important stresses that The Hi is also about tackling overfishing, pollution and climate change impacts that ripple back to coastal communities.
More from Morning Overview