Miscarriage is often framed as a sudden, inexplicable loss that strikes in the first weeks of a wanted pregnancy. Yet a growing body of research suggests that some of the deepest roots of pregnancy loss may be laid decades earlier, while a future mother is still a fetus herself. That shift in perspective is unsettling, but it also opens the door to clearer science and, crucially, to less blame directed at women when pregnancies end.
Instead of seeing miscarriage as a single event, I see it increasingly as the end point of a long biological story, one that can span three generations and involve genes, hormones, and environmental exposures. Understanding that story does not make the grief any smaller, but it does change where responsibility lies and where medicine might intervene next.
Miscarriage is common, and usually not the parents’ fault
Clinicians have long known that pregnancy loss is far more common than most people realize, with estimates that About 15% to 25% of clinically recognized pregnancies end in miscarriage. Many more losses happen so early that they are mistaken for a late period. Medical groups describe miscarriage as a pregnancy that ends spontaneously before 20 weeks, and they emphasize that the most frequent culprits are biological problems in the embryo or placenta rather than anything a woman did or did not do. That message, that Miscarriage is not a moral failure, is still struggling to catch up with the lived shame many patients describe.
When doctors look closely at the tissue from a loss, they often find that the pregnancy was genetically abnormal from the start. One major review notes that Genetics is a primary contributor to miscarriage, and that Chromosomal abnormalities are diagnosed in over 50% of first-trimester miscarriages. Another summary puts it bluntly, stating that At the time of conception, the baby receives half the genes from the mother and half from the father, and if some of that genetic information is lost or duplicated, the pregnancy that miscarries is probably abnormal from the beginning. That is why major medical centers, from the clinical side to research institutes, keep repeating a simple point: most miscarriages are the result of chromosomal or developmental problems that parents cannot control.
The genetic story starts before a girl is born
The idea that the seeds of pregnancy loss might be planted before a woman is even born rests on a basic fact of human development. A female infant will be born with all of the eggs that she will ever have, and Thus that infant’s genetic contribution to her own offspring is already present in the fetus that is housed in that offspring’s eggs. As one fertility explainer puts it, Biological women are born with all the eggs we will ever have, and Biological women are born with all the eggs we will ever have, there is no way to make more eggs. That means the egg that will one day become a pregnancy is already present in a grandmother’s womb, suspended in time.
Inside those eggs, a delicate process called meiosis has already begun. In women, meiosis begins before birth, during fetal development, when chromosomes pair up and exchange fragments of DNA. A large genetic study of pregnancy loss notes that this process can stall for decades, and that errors in chromosome separation can lead to embryos with too many or too few chromosomes, a condition known as aneuploidy, which is a major cause of miscarriage. Researchers linked specific variants in the maternal genome to a higher risk of such errors, showing that Jan findings about meiosis are not just textbook biology but a live factor in pregnancy outcomes decades later.
Chromosomes, inherited risk, and why “50%” matters
When pregnancy tissue is analyzed after a loss, the most common finding is a problem in the fetal Chromosomes. Chromosomes are the inherited structures in the cells of our bodies, and each chromosome holds hundreds to thousands of genes that direct development. Clinical genetics services explain that Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities, such as an extra or missing chromosome, are a leading cause of miscarriage, and that structural rearrangements in the parents’ Chromosomes can also cause miscarriage by disrupting key genes. One hospital’s prenatal program on Chromosomes and another section on Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities both stress that these errors are usually random and not caused by lifestyle.
Geneticists have tried to put numbers on this. One overview of the Genetics of miscarriage reports that Foetal chromosomal abnormalities account for Approximately 50% of first trimester miscarriages, and that these errors often arise when eggs remain stuck in prophase I for several decades. Another scientific review echoes that figure, stating that Genetics of Foetal chromosomal abnormalities cause Approximately 50% of early losses. A separate analysis of recurrent loss notes again that Chromosomal abnormalities are diagnosed in over 50% of first-trimester miscarriages, and that Nov data link these Chromosomal errors to age and inherited variants. Together, these figures make a stark point: roughly half of early miscarriages can be traced to chromosomal problems that often originate in the egg long before pregnancy.
Three-generation echoes: grandmothers, toxins, and DNA switches
Genes are only part of the story. The environment in which those eggs develop can also leave marks that echo across generations. Developmental biologists describe how, When a pregnant woman is exposed to an environmental agent, the exposure can affect not only herself (F0) and her unborn child (F1), but also the germ cells that will give rise to her grandchildren (F2). That means a grandmother’s exposure to stress, malnutrition, or chemicals can, in theory, influence the biology of her grandchildren. A review of multigenerational cohorts explains that When researchers follow families over time, they see patterns that suggest the original exposure can ripple into later generations.
Some of those ripples may be carried not by changes in DNA sequence but by chemical tags on DNA, a field known as epigenetics. Recent studies have identified DNA methylation as a possible mediator of the impact of prenatal stress in the offspring, and have asked Whether prenatal stress in grandmothers is associated with DNA methylation in grandchildren. One study of grandmaternal stress found that altered methylation patterns in grandchildren could serve as a potential biomarker for health problems, suggesting that Aug data on DNA show how stress can leave molecular fingerprints. Another line of work looks at endocrine disruptors. In Skinner’s words, “what your great-grandmother was exposed to could cause disease in you and your grandchildren,” and case studies of pesticides and industrial chemicals suggest that In Skinner and colleagues’ work, descendants further down the line can show increased risk of reproductive problems.
DES, new genetic studies, and what parents can actually do
One of the clearest human examples of a three-generation effect involves diethylstilbestrol, or DES, a synthetic estrogen once prescribed to prevent miscarriage. Abstract summaries of epidemiologic work note that in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES) has been associated with increased risk of adverse health outcomes such as cancer, birth defects, and fertility problems, and that DES exposure leads to lasting DNA methylation changes in blood. Follow up studies of women whose mothers took DES during pregnancy show higher rates of structural uterine abnormalities and pregnancy complications, suggesting that Abstract evidence of DES-linked methylation is not just a lab curiosity. Regulators now classify DES as an endocrine-disrupting chemical that can cause cancer, birth defects, and other developmental abnormalities, and historical reviews note that the drug continued to be prescribed to pregnant women in Europe until 1978, even as concerns mounted that Europe and other regions were exposing generations to DES.
More from Morning Overview