In Washington, President Donald Trump is waging an aggressive campaign to revive fossil fuels and dismantle climate rules, yet the real contest for power is unfolding on the grid and in financial markets. Across the United States, clean energy is expanding, investors are piling into renewables, and states are locking in long term climate targets that are difficult to unwind. The result is a collision between a federal agenda built around oil, gas, and coal and an energy system that is rapidly tilting toward cheaper, cleaner electricity.
I see a pattern emerging that is less about partisan rhetoric and more about structural economics. Rising electricity demand, surging green investment, and state level policy are combining to blunt Trump’s efforts, even as his administration cancels projects, rolls back EPA rules, and attacks offshore wind. The question is not whether there is a fight, but which side is quietly winning it.
The demand shock Trump cannot control
The first constraint on Trump’s fossil fuel push is simple physics and economics: power demand is climbing, and the cheapest new supply is increasingly renewable. Federal forecasters describe Rising electricity consumption driven largely by commercial and industrial users, a trend amplified by energy hungry data centers and artificial intelligence. As more servers, heat pumps, and electric vehicles plug into the grid, utilities need vast amounts of new generation, and wind and solar projects can usually be built faster and at lower operating cost than new coal or gas plants.
That reality is visible in the project pipeline. Even as Trump attacks renewables across the federal government, clean power additions are still booming, with one analysis noting that Trump is targeting green energy at the very moment developers are racing to meet surging load. A separate assessment of new capacity shows that Even though the Republican federal administration favors fossil fuels, the solar industry group SEIA reports that 73% of new solar capacity is still being built in states including Utah, Kentucky, and Arkansas. In other words, the market is not waiting for federal permission.
States and investors are writing a different script
While Trump retreats from international climate commitments, some of the largest state economies are moving in the opposite direction. California officials highlight that California‘s climate leadership has cut Pollution while the economy grows, with Greenhouse gas emissions falling as the state pursues 100 percent clean electricity. A recent Poll cited by state leaders suggests voters back this trajectory, reinforcing that the political risk now lies in ignoring the clean energy buildout, not accelerating it. Other states are following suit, with the United States seeing renewable growth driven by key states and supportive policies that have made United States clean power expansion anything but accidental.
Capital markets are reinforcing that shift. Green equities have rallied as investors bet that electricity demand will keep climbing, with Green energy stocks gaining even as Trump vows to eradicate ESG and DEI. One report notes that the sector has jumped by 33 percent, a sign that investors are looking past near term policy swings and toward long term demand. Analysts describe how Despite federal headwinds, renewables are growing at breakneck speed and outcompeting fossil fuels on cost, a structural trend that is difficult for any administration to reverse.
Congress quietly locked in powerful green incentives
Trump’s rhetoric suggests a government unified behind fossil fuels, but the legislative record tells a more complicated story. The biggest shift in federal energy policy last year came from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a sprawling law that expanded clean energy incentives even as the White House talked up oil and gas. Analysts note that the One Big Beautiful boosted Tax credits for wind and solar, locking in long term investment and production incentives that developers can bank on regardless of day to day political fights. A separate legal analysis underscores that One Big Beautiful shortened depreciation schedules for renewable assets, a technical change that significantly improves project economics at a time when data center driven demand shows no sign of abating.
These provisions are already shaping the 2026 power sector outlook. Analysts who Read Utility Dive‘s assessment of the year ahead describe a grid where renewable energy and distributed resources are central to planning, even as FERC grapples with affordability and reliability. Another overview of Jan data center trends stresses the urgency of connecting new renewable resources quickly to meet that load. In practice, the law has turned tax policy into a quiet engine of decarbonization, even as Trump publicly champions fossil fuel “dominance.”
Legal and regulatory pushback is blunting fossil rollbacks
Trump’s team is not just talking about fossil fuels, it is moving aggressively to reshape federal rules, particularly at the EPA. Experts warn that EPA actions during Trump‘s second term are poised to sharply increase greenhouse gas emissions by rolling back multiple climate rules at once. Environmental groups describe an administration that is “doing everything it can” to slow and even kill renewable energy, with one campaign branded An Unstoppable Movement precisely because, Despite renewable energy’s numerous benefits, the administration is still trying to tilt the playing field back toward fossil fuels. Yet courts and regulators are proving to be significant counterweights.
In early January, a federal judge ruled that Trump‘s administration acted illegally when it cancelled $7.6 billion (around €6.52 billion) in funding for clean energy projects, a decision that underscored the legal limits on executive power. Environmental lawyers are also challenging efforts to extend the life of aging coal plants, warning that those costs are likely to be borne by electricity customers in Colorado and nearby states and highlighting concerns raised by a member of the White House‘s National Economic Council. At the same time, FERC Chair Phillips has signaled that FERC will keep tweaking markets to integrate new resources, a reminder that independent regulators still have room to steer the system toward cleaner power.
Trump’s anti-renewable blitz is colliding with economics
None of this means Trump has stopped trying to tilt the field. Environmental advocates catalog a long list of actions, from offshore wind to project permitting, that are designed to slow the green transition. A recent Press statement blasted the decision titled Trump Administration Announces, with attorney Ted Kelly, a Director and Lead, arguing that the move violates federal law. Another legal campaign details What he’s doing: President Trump is working feverishly to prevent federal permitting for wind and solar projects that already have state level support. The administration has also cancelled Trump backed funding cuts, including a decision where President Trump moved to cancel $679 million for offshore wind, part of a broader effort to prioritize fossil fuels and hinder renewable projects.
Yet these moves are increasingly out of step with consumer economics and public sentiment. The advocacy group Public Citizen argues that Trump‘s push to expand liquefied natural gas exports is helping keep domestic gas prices high, contributing to stubbornly expensive power bills. Climate advocates warn that President Donald Trump‘s stance against cheap solar and other green energy could backfire politically as households look for relief. One activist who installed a home system described in an In an interview how he simply plugged his system into the wall and “tada we’re running on sun,” a sentiment echoed in a widely shared Jan clip and a related High electricity prices video that highlight how easy and popular rooftop solar has become.
More from Morning Overview