Germany is positioning itself as the spearhead of a tougher European line against President Donald Trump’s tariff threats over Greenland, framing Washington’s move as economic blackmail that cannot go unanswered. What began as a dispute over a remote Arctic territory has quickly turned into a test of whether Europe is willing to wield its own power in a high‑stakes confrontation with the United States.
As Berlin talks openly about retaliation and a “strong response,” the coming days are shaping up as a showdown over sovereignty, trade and the future of the transatlantic relationship. The question is no longer whether Europe will respond, but how far it is prepared to go to prove that it will not be coerced into selling Greenland or accepting punitive tariffs.
From Greenland gambit to tariff shock
The current crisis was triggered when President Donald Trump tied a renewed push to acquire Greenland to the threat of sweeping tariffs on European exports. Over the weekend he warned that a 10% levy would hit all goods shipped from Denmark to the United States, a move that would also slam wider European supply chains and was quickly described in Brussels as trade blackmail. For European leaders, the message was clear: sell the Arctic island or pay a price at the border.
Trump has further inflamed tensions by linking his Greenland pressure campaign to grievances far beyond trade, including his anger over being passed over for the Nobel Peace Prize and long‑running disputes inside NATO. In a pointed intervention reported from LONDON, he warned Europe that failure to cooperate on Greenland and security issues could carry consequences, while allies privately fretted that the White House was folding everything from Russia policy to personal slights into a single pressure campaign. The result is a standoff that feels less like a narrow trade dispute and more like a stress test of the entire Western alliance.
Europe closes ranks around Denmark and Greenland
Faced with Washington’s ultimatum, European capitals have moved with unusual speed to show a united front. EU ambassadors convened an emergency meeting in Brussels, where countries directly targeted by Trump’s Greenland tariffs threat declared that they would not allow any outside power to dictate the future of the Arctic territory or undermine “our sovereignty.” That message was echoed at the highest level when EU heads of state and government agreed to gather for a hastily arranged dinner on a Thursday in Jan to coordinate which of the bloc’s tools to deploy in what one diplomat bluntly called a “trade dispute with the US.” The choreography is designed to send a signal that Denmark will not be left to face Washington alone.
Publicly, senior officials have stressed that the European Union is “united” in the face of Trump’s Greenland threats and the new tariffs he has announced on several European products. Officials have pointedly recalled that Trump already floated the idea of buying Greenland in his first term, and argue that the latest escalation confirms that the island has become a proxy for a broader struggle over who sets the rules in the North Atlantic. In that context, standing behind Copenhagen is as much about defending the integrity of the EU as it is about any single territory.
Germany steps out front with threats of retaliation
Within this united front, Germany has emerged as the loudest voice promising that Europe will not simply absorb Trump’s blows. Berlin has already signaled that Europe is preparing countermeasures against President Donald Trump in response to what it calls blackmail over Greenland. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has underlined that Europe wants to “avoid any escalation” with the United States, but in the same breath he has warned that the bloc would hit back “if necessary” and that Washington should not underestimate Europe’s capacity to retaliate. That dual message of restraint and resolve is now the core of Berlin’s strategy.
The hawkish tone is not limited to the chancellery. German finance minister Lars Klingbeil has used a press conference in Berlin to underline that there will be a “strong response” to any additional US tariffs, arguing that the European Union needs robust instruments to counter unfair trade practices and that Germany will push for them at the EU level. Images of German Federal Finance at the Bundespressekonferenz in Berlin have become shorthand for a government that is no longer content to talk vaguely about “concerns” but is instead preparing concrete countermeasures. In remarks reported on Monday, Lars Klingbeil made clear that Berlin sees the Greenland tariffs as a test case for whether Europe can defend itself in an era of weaponized interdependence.
EU options: tariffs, legal action and strategic deterrence
Behind the scenes, European leaders are now weighing a menu of responses that go well beyond rhetorical pushback. Analysts close to the talks say that at the emergency summit in Jan, EU heads of state will be presented with three main options for responding to the Trump tariffs: targeted counter‑tariffs on politically sensitive US exports, a legal challenge at the World Trade Organization, and a broader strategy of reducing dependence on American markets in key sectors. The same analysis notes that the tools at their disposal are “mainly three options,” but that the political choice is whether to escalate quickly or hold some measures in reserve as deterrence.
Some of the groundwork for a coordinated response has already been laid. Earlier in Jan, European leaders pledged a united answer after Von der Leyen insisted that the EU would uphold its sovereignty and hinted that retaliation could take the form of new tariffs on US goods. Officials in Brussels are also dusting off contingency plans from previous trade fights, including the idea of hitting emblematic American products if Washington follows through on its 10% tariff on all goods from Denmar and other partners. For now, the message from the Berlaymont is that Europe prefers de‑escalation, but will not shy away from using its economic weight if forced.
Fear of a downward spiral, and what is really at stake
Even as they talk tough, many European leaders are acutely aware of the risks of a tit‑for‑tat confrontation with Washington. Senior figures have warned of a potential “downward spiral” if Trump’s tariffs over Greenland are met with immediate and sweeping counter‑measures, a scenario that could quickly spill over into other areas of cooperation from climate policy to security. The anxiety is not abstract: the Greenland dispute has already generated new tariffs on European Partners, with the Trump Administration using its trade arsenal to squeeze allies over international negotiations unrelated to trade. For export‑heavy economies like Germany, the prospect of a prolonged trade war with their largest security partner is deeply unsettling.
At the same time, there is a growing recognition that the Greenland episode is about more than tariffs or even territorial control. Policy thinkers have argued that The EU should tell Washington that any annexation of Greenland would trigger a major diplomatic crisis and could ultimately destroy the European project unless it responds with a credible strategy, including building a meaningful European defence. That logic is already shaping the political mood in capitals, where leaders recall how EU heads once rushed to Brussels for an emergency meeting on a Thursday night to craft a unified response to a different security shock. The Greenland showdown is now being treated with similar gravity, as a moment that will reveal whether Europe is willing to pay an economic price to defend its sovereignty.
Supporting sources: Trump says ‘no, Trump escalates Greenland.
More from Morning Overview