Rare earth elements sit at the heart of everything from iPhone speakers to wind turbines, yet the world’s supply chain still runs through a narrow geopolitical funnel. Currently, China controls roughly 70% of rare earths mining and 90% of processing, a concentration that leaves clean energy plans and defense systems exposed to political risk. Faced with that leverage, researchers and companies are turning to an unlikely duo for help: fungi farms and mega trash mounds.
The emerging strategy is simple to describe and hard to execute. Instead of blasting new open pits, engineers want to harvest rare earths from coal ash, mine tailings and industrial waste, using microbes to tease metals out of material that was once written off as pollution. If it works at scale, this approach could ease dependence on China while cleaning up some of the dirtiest legacies of the fossil fuel era.
The trash mountain resource shock
The first surprise in this story is just how much value is already buried in waste. Analyses of old mine sites suggest that tailings piles and landfills contain significant concentrations of rare earths and other critical minerals that were ignored when only gold or copper mattered. One assessment of buried deposits in The US estimates that almost $100 Billion Worth of Rare Earth Elements May Be Buried, a figure that reframes trash mounds and slag heaps as strategic stockpiles rather than dead liabilities, especially as demand for electric vehicles and grid batteries accelerates.
Coal ash is emerging as one of the most promising of these unconventional reserves. Work centered in AUSTIN, Texas, under the banner Enormous Cache of Rare Earth Elements Hidden Inside Coal Ash Waste, has highlighted how the chalky remnants of Coal combustion hold a surprisingly rich mix of rare earths that could bolster the country’s rare earth element supply. Separate research describes this ash as a Vast, Untapped Domestic Resource, with one team estimating that $8.4 billion worth of rare earth elements could be extracted from American deposits, a number that instantly changes how utilities and regulators think about long term ash management.
Why coal ash and tailings beat new mines
There is a strategic logic to targeting waste instead of carving new pits into pristine mountains. Many coal plants already store ash in centralized ponds or landfills, which means the material is accessible without the cost and community backlash that accompany greenfield mines. Studies of mining regions show that Tailings and acid mine drainage from old operations contain critical minerals needed for clean energy technologies, and that Now researchers are developing methods to pull rare earth oxides out of these streams at industrially relevant scales. In effect, the infrastructure and the environmental damage already exist, so the marginal footprint of reprocessing can be far smaller than starting from scratch.
That matters because conventional rare earth extraction is notoriously messy. One detailed assessment of hard rock deposits notes that environmental degradation is baked into current techniques, and that finding an alternate method of extracting rare earth elements that is both economically and eco-friendly is now a central research goal. The same work argues that any new approach must be judged not only on recovery rates but also on how it compares with existing techniques of rare earth elements extraction in terms of water use, tailings toxicity and long term monitoring costs. When those full lifecycle costs are counted, re-mining waste starts to look less like a niche experiment and more like a rational pivot.
Fungi farms and the rise of bioleaching
If trash mounds are the new ore bodies, fungi are the new miners. In controlled experiments, Yeasts have shown a surprising talent for grabbing rare earth ions from complex mixtures, with Yeasts like Yarrowia lipolytica able to extract REEs from ores or electronic waste in work led by Ferreira and colleagues. These microbes secrete organic acids and other compounds that loosen metals from solid matrices, a process that can be tuned by adjusting pH, temperature and nutrient levels in what is essentially a biological refinery.
Fungi are not working alone. Other Studies of Bioleaching have demonstrated that Aspergillus niger can recover valuable elements from phosphogypsum, a calcium sulfate waste produced by fertilizer plants, while at the same time reducing waste toxicity. A broader review of microbial recovery notes that the benefits of bio-recovery or bioleaching include lower energy inputs and the potential to operate at ambient temperatures, although it also stresses that scale up and process control remain areas of ongoing research. The pattern is clear: microbes can do the chemistry, but engineers still need to prove they can do it reliably in the chaotic conditions of a landfill or ash pond.
From Swedish copper to global rare earth playbook
One way to see where this could go is to look at metals beyond rare earths. In Sweden, a project called MycoMine presented an idea for extracting copper from mine waste using fungi, with the method expected to play a major role in reducing the environmental impact of metal production and for achieving a long-term sustainable mining industry. That effort treats fungal bioreactors as modular tools that can be deployed at legacy sites, stripping out residual metals while stabilizing the remaining waste, a model that could be adapted to rare earth rich tailings in North America and Asia.
Industry strategists are already talking about a broader shift toward what some call Mining and Remining Bonanza 2.0. One analysis notes that Though the precious metals originally mined are mostly depleted now, the waste piles left behind are gaining renewed attention because they still contain minerals that are critical to our modern day technologies and life. If that logic holds, I expect more companies to pair mechanical sorting and chemical leaching with microbial steps, using fungi to clean up the last, most stubborn fraction of metals that conventional methods leave behind.
The decaf coffee analogy and its limits
To make sense of this microbial turn, I find it useful to borrow a metaphor from everyday life. One overview of emerging techniques explicitly draws Lessons Learned from Decaf Coffee, Fungi, and Magnets, arguing that One promising method is to employ microorganisms, such as bacteria, Fungi, and other agents, to strip valuable elements from shredded waste in a way that resembles how caffeine is removed from coffee beans. The comparison is not perfect, but it captures the idea of selectively pulling out a target compound while leaving the bulk material intact, a concept that could make urban mining from discarded electronics as routine as decaffeinating a latte.
The analogy also highlights a blind spot in much of the current hype. Decaf processing is standardized and tightly regulated, while rare earth bioleaching is still a patchwork of lab protocols and pilot projects. Long term studies of strains like Yarrowia in mixed waste streams are sparse, and the economic feasibility of running large fungal farms on the scale of a coal plant remains unverified based on available sources. Until those data exist, claims that bioleaching alone will solve the rare earth crunch risk overselling what is, for now, a promising but immature technology.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
