Caleb Oquendo/Pexels

Ford ended 2025 with a distinction no major automaker wants: it shattered the modern U.S. record for vehicle recalls and snapped a decade of relative stability in its own safety record. After years in which the company’s recall totals, while high, roughly tracked the rest of the industry, the latest numbers show a surge in safety actions that pulled millions of owners back to dealerships and put fresh scrutiny on how Ford designs, tests, and fixes its vehicles.

I see this as more than a statistical outlier. The scale, pace, and nature of Ford’s 2025 recalls point to deeper questions about quality control, engineering complexity, and corporate priorities at a time when the company is trying to juggle combustion trucks, hybrid workhorses, and electric flagships all at once.

How Ford’s recall tally blew past a 10‑year benchmark

By the end of 2025, Ford had crossed a threshold that would have seemed unthinkable a few years earlier. One detailed count found that the company initiated 150 separate recall actions in a single year, a figure that on its own would have marked a historic spike in safety campaigns. Another analysis put the final total even higher, concluding that Ford ultimately issued 153 recalls that together swept up nearly 12.93 m Ford vehicles. However you slice the final count, the company’s own recent history makes the jump stand out, because it broke a 10‑year pattern in which Ford’s recall totals, while often high, had not approached this level of fragmentation and volume.

What makes the 2025 surge even more striking is that it did not come from a single catastrophic defect but from a drumbeat of issues across nameplates and systems. Reporting on Ford highlights that a notable share of the year’s activity involved follow‑up recalls, where earlier fixes had to be revised or expanded. That pattern suggests not only that problems were widespread, but that some of the company’s initial repair strategies were not robust enough, a dynamic that can quickly multiply the number of formal recall campaigns even when they trace back to the same underlying flaw.

The moment the “dubious record” came into view

The scale of Ford’s recall problem did not become clear all at once. By late summer, the company had already crossed a symbolic line, with one tally noting that it had hit 100 safety campaigns in 2025 and, more precisely, 103 separate recalls by that point in the year. That milestone was already being described as a “Dubious Record” and framed as a sign that Ford was on track to double the previous high watermark for an automaker’s annual recall count. For owners, the message was clear long before the final numbers were tallied: if you drove a Ford, there was a good chance you would be hearing from the company about a safety fix.

Inside the industry, that midyear moment changed the tone of the conversation around Ford’s quality performance. Analysts and dealers began to talk less about isolated engineering missteps and more about systemic issues, especially as internal and external voices acknowledged that Ford Hits a wave of Safety Recalls This Year that was already far beyond the old record of 77 campaigns. Once the company had blown past that earlier benchmark with months still left on the calendar, the question shifted from whether Ford would set a new record to how far it would overshoot it and what that would mean for its reputation.

Ford versus the rest of the industry

Context matters when judging recall numbers, and in 2025 Ford did not just edge out its rivals, it lapped them. One detailed breakdown concluded that Ford’s Key Points included setting an all‑time record with 153 recalls that covered nearly 13 million vehicles, a scale no other brand approached. Another analysis framed the disparity even more starkly, noting that Ford recalled more vehicles than the next nine brands combined and that its total volume of affected cars and trucks dwarfed rivals that were themselves dealing with serious safety campaigns.

On a unit basis, the gap was just as glaring. One newsletter focused on dealer economics reported that Ford recalls more vehicles than any other automaker in 2025, contrasting its tally with brands like Tesla, which logged 11 recalls affecting 745,075 vehicles. That comparison underscores how unusual Ford’s year was: even in a regulatory environment where safety agencies are increasingly aggressive and software‑driven cars can be updated quickly, no other manufacturer came close to matching Ford’s combination of recall frequency and breadth.

Inside the recalls: from power loss to headlights and beyond

Behind the headline numbers were specific, concrete problems that affected how Ford vehicles behaved on the road. One widely discussed campaign targeted a power loss issue that could cause certain models to unexpectedly lose propulsion, a defect serious enough to trigger one of the 152 total vehicle recalls tallied in 2025. Another recall addressed headlights that might fail on 2025 to 2026 Mustang Mach-E vehicles, affecting more than 45,000 units and raising obvious concerns about nighttime visibility and crash risk.

Other campaigns swept in workhorse trucks and mainstream SUVs, including popular F‑Series models and crossovers that anchor Ford’s sales base. One legal‑focused overview noted that Millions of Ford vehicles, including heavy‑duty trucks like the Ford F‑550, were touched by the year’s 150 recall actions. When I look across those examples, a pattern emerges: the problems were not confined to cutting‑edge electric platforms or aging legacy products, but cut across Ford’s entire portfolio, from commercial rigs to halo EVs, suggesting that the underlying quality challenges are broad rather than isolated.

Follow‑up fixes and the cost of getting it wrong twice

One of the most troubling aspects of Ford’s 2025 recall story is how often the company had to revisit the same problem. Reporting on Ford Sets New Recall Record highlights that a notable portion of the recall volume involved follow‑up campaigns, where earlier repairs either failed to fully resolve the defect or introduced new complications. That dynamic is particularly damaging because it forces owners to return to dealerships multiple times for what feels like the same issue, eroding trust not only in the vehicle but in the company’s ability to diagnose and fix problems correctly the first time.

From a cost perspective, repeat recalls are a force multiplier. Each additional campaign means more parts, more technician hours, and more logistical overhead, all while vehicles sit in service bays instead of on the road. When I see references to Ford issuing follow‑up recalls to correct earlier repairs, I read that as a sign that the company’s internal validation processes for fixes are under strain. In an era when software updates and complex electronics can make a repair as much about code as hardware, the risk of incomplete solutions rises, and Ford’s 2025 experience shows how quickly that can snowball into a cascade of additional safety actions.

How the record year unfolded in real time

Seen from the outside, 2025 looked like a year in which Ford’s recall machine never stopped running. One commentator, Dane, captured the mood in a midyear discussion that noted Ford now had more recalls in 2025 than any OEM in U.S. history, and that it appeared to have set the record while the year was still unfolding. That sense of a rolling, real‑time crisis was reinforced every time a new campaign landed in owners’ inboxes, whether it involved a software glitch, a mechanical defect, or a safety system that did not behave as intended.

By the time analysts were tallying up the final numbers, the narrative had hardened. One synthesis described how Ford sets an unwanted record as recalls piled up, emphasizing that the raw unit counts were as stark as the number of campaigns. When I trace that arc from early warnings about a “Dubious Record” to year‑end confirmation that Ford had shattered a decade‑old benchmark, what stands out is how little breathing room the company had. There was no quiet quarter to reset and regroup, only a steady accumulation of safety actions that kept the story alive month after month.

What this means for Ford owners and dealers

For owners, the practical impact of Ford’s recall surge is measured in time, inconvenience, and anxiety. Each campaign requires scheduling a service visit, arranging transportation, and in some cases waiting for parts to arrive, especially when a defect affects hundreds of thousands of vehicles at once. When millions of Ford vehicles are swept into recalls in a single year, as one legal overview of Ford Vehicle Recalls Set New Record makes clear, the cumulative burden on customers is enormous, even if each individual repair is relatively quick.

Dealers, meanwhile, sit at the front line of the fallout. On one hand, recall work brings service revenue and foot traffic, which can help offset softer new‑car margins. On the other, a year in which Ford recalls more vehicles than any other automaker, as highlighted in the dealer‑focused analysis of Ford recalls more vehicles, strains service bays, frustrates customers who struggle to get appointments, and complicates sales conversations when shoppers ask pointed questions about quality. In that environment, even loyal Ford buyers may start to wonder whether they should wait for the company to prove that 2025 was an aberration rather than a new normal.

Can Ford turn a recall crisis into a quality reset?

Ford’s leadership now faces a difficult balancing act. On one side, the company can argue that aggressive recalls show a commitment to safety, that it is willing to act quickly when problems emerge rather than quietly hoping they go away. On the other, the sheer volume of campaigns, from the power loss recall to the Mustang Mach‑E headlight fix and dozens of smaller actions, makes it hard to escape the conclusion that something fundamental in Ford’s development and validation pipeline needs to change. When I look at the pattern of follow‑up recalls and the breadth of affected models, I see a company that must treat 2025 as a forcing function for deeper reforms rather than a public‑relations problem to be managed.

There are signs that Ford understands the stakes. Analyses that lay out the Ford recall record often note that the company has publicly committed to improving quality and reducing defects, even as it pushes ahead with complex new products. Whether that rhetoric translates into fewer recalls in the years ahead will depend on unglamorous work: tightening supplier oversight, investing in testing, and empowering engineers to slow launches when red flags appear. After a year in which Ford’s recall count hit 153 and the company’s safety actions became a running story, the bar for proving that change is real has never been higher.

More from Morning Overview