U.S. power plant developers plan to add 86 gigawatts of new utility-scale electric generating capacity in 2026, with 93% of those additions coming from renewable sources and battery storage, according to the Energy Information Administration. Shares of solar-related companies including First Solar and Enphase Energy rose in market trading, as investors reacted to the scale of clean energy deployment implied by the EIA’s outlook. The EIA said the 86 GW figure would exceed the previous record set just last year, when 53 GW came online in what it described as the largest single-year addition since 2002.
Record 86 GW Dwarfs Last Year’s Buildout
The EIA published its updated capacity outlook on February 20, 2026, drawing on monthly filings from developers and operators tracked through its generator inventory. That dataset, which covers proposed and existing generating units of 1 megawatt or greater, shows a large pipeline of projects scheduled for 2026. At 86 GW, the planned additions for 2026 represent a roughly 62% jump over the 53 GW that entered service in 2025, underscoring how quickly the development pipeline has grown.
What makes the 2026 pipeline historically unusual is not just its size but its composition. Solar accounts for approximately 51% of planned additions, battery storage for about 28%, and wind for roughly 14%, according to the EIA’s latest capacity analysis. That leaves natural gas with only a thin slice of the total, a striking reversal from the mid-2010s when gas turbines dominated new builds. The lopsided mix means fossil fuel generation is losing its grip on the margin of new supply, even as total electricity demand climbs and regions with strong solar and wind resources become the focal point for new grid investments.
Why Solar and Storage Are Pulling Away
Two forces are converging to tilt the buildout so heavily toward solar and batteries. First, costs for utility-scale photovoltaic systems have generally declined over time, and developers have continued to expand domestic supply options. Second, battery storage economics have improved, making it easier for developers to pair four-hour lithium-ion systems with solar farms and use them to shift output into higher-value hours. The EIA’s February 2026 short-term outlook highlights projected solar generation growth and rising demand from data centers and electrification as key drivers pushing developers to file for ever-larger interconnection agreements.
The 28% share claimed by battery storage deserves particular attention. Storage is not a generation source in the traditional sense; it shifts energy from hours of surplus to hours of scarcity. But grid operators increasingly treat it as dispatchable capacity, and its rapid expansion means that intermittency, long cited as solar and wind’s Achilles’ heel, is being addressed at the project level rather than through after-the-fact grid upgrades. Developers are bundling storage into solar proposals from the start, which speeds permitting and reduces the need for separate transmission investments, while also helping to smooth net load profiles that would otherwise deepen midday price troughs and steep evening ramps.
Stock Market Reads the Grid Signal
Wall Street moved quickly after the EIA data dropped. First Solar and Enphase Energy both posted sharp gains, reflecting a market view that the 93% renewable share is not a one-off statistical quirk but a durable structural shift in how the U.S. builds power infrastructure. First Solar, as the largest American-headquartered solar panel manufacturer, stands to capture a disproportionate share of domestic procurement, especially as utilities seek to satisfy buy-American provisions tied to federal tax credits. Enphase, which specializes in microinverters for residential and commercial solar, benefits from the broader signal that solar is now the default technology for new capacity at every scale, from rooftop projects to multi-hundred-megawatt utility plants.
The investor enthusiasm, however, carries a caveat that most coverage has glossed over. Planned capacity is not the same as installed capacity. The EIA’s inventory tracks what developers have filed, not what has cleared every permitting, interconnection, and financing hurdle. Historically, a meaningful share of proposed projects slip to later years or get canceled outright because of supply chain delays, land-use disputes, or grid queue bottlenecks. The 86 GW pipeline is best understood as a ceiling, not a guarantee, and the gap between filings and completions will determine whether 2026 actually delivers on its record promise or simply shifts a wave of projects into 2027 and beyond.
What a 93% Clean Share Means for the Grid
If the buildout lands anywhere close to plan, the practical consequences extend well beyond stock tickers. Adding roughly 44 GW of solar in a single year (about 51% of 86 GW) would be a historically large expansion of photovoltaic capacity. That volume of clean generation, paired with storage, could meaningfully slow the growth of power-sector carbon emissions even as electricity demand rises from electric vehicles, heat pumps, and data center expansion. The 53 GW installed in 2025 already marked the largest capacity addition year since 2002, and the 2026 pipeline suggests the pace is accelerating rather than plateauing, potentially reshaping regional power markets faster than regulators anticipated.
For households and businesses, the shift matters most at the margin of electricity pricing. New solar and storage projects typically lock in power purchase agreements at fixed rates for 15 to 25 years, which insulates buyers from the fuel-cost volatility that drives natural gas price spikes. Regions that add the most renewable capacity tend to see wholesale price compression during daylight hours, a benefit that can flow through to retail bills depending on how state regulators structure rate design. The flip side is that aging coal and gas plants, now facing competition from zero-marginal-cost renewables, may retire faster than planned, tightening capacity margins during peak seasons unless storage and demand response scale up in tandem with new solar and wind.
Natural Gas, Reliability, and the Transition Pace
The shrinking share of natural gas in planned capacity additions does not mean gas is disappearing from the system. Existing combined-cycle plants still supply a large portion of U.S. electricity, and their fuel flexibility makes them a key reliability backstop as renewables grow. The EIA’s weekly gas storage data show how swings in heating and power demand can quickly draw down inventories, with price impacts that ripple into electricity markets. As more solar and wind come online, gas plants may run fewer hours but remain essential during prolonged heat waves, cold snaps, or cloudy, windless periods when storage alone cannot cover multi-day shortfalls.
Policy and market design will determine how smoothly that transition unfolds. Capacity markets, ancillary service products, and flexible tariff structures will need to reward fast-ramping resources, including batteries and responsive gas units, for the reliability value they provide. At the same time, the EIA’s analysis of planned additions underscores that developers are steering capital toward technologies that dominate the current pipeline. Whether 2026 ultimately delivers the full 86 GW or a somewhat smaller total, the direction of travel is clear: solar, storage, and wind are now setting the pace, and fossil fuel projects are increasingly filling niche roles rather than defining the mainstream of new U.S. power capacity.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
