The European Union has delivered its starkest warning yet to TikTok, accusing the video app of using design tricks that keep users hooked and potentially harm children. Regulators say the platform must overhaul these engagement features or face penalties that could run into the billions of dollars under the bloc’s toughest online content law to date.
At the heart of the dispute is whether TikTok’s core mechanics, from endless scrolling to finely tuned recommendations, cross the line from clever product design into unlawful manipulation. The case will help define how far platforms can go in engineering attention before regulators step in to protect users’ time, data, and mental health.
The EU’s landmark case against TikTok’s ‘addictive design’
The European Commission has issued preliminary findings that TikTok’s interface and recommendation systems breach the bloc’s flagship online rulebook, the Digital Services Act, by fostering an “addictive design” that can trap users in prolonged viewing sessions. In its formal communication, the European Commission argues that features such as infinite scroll and autoplay are not neutral choices, but deliberate mechanisms that exploit psychological vulnerabilities, particularly among younger users. The case is framed not as a moral critique of screen time, but as a legal assessment of whether a platform has taken sufficient steps to mitigate systemic risks created by its own design.
According to the Commission’s initial assessment, TikTok’s approach to user engagement may violate specific obligations imposed on very large online platforms under the Digital Services Act, which requires robust risk assessments and effective safeguards against harms such as compulsive use. The regulators say that, as of Today in Feb, TikTok has not adequately reduced the risks stemming from its addictive design, a conclusion spelled out in a detailed preliminary finding. TikTok now has a chance to respond, but the tone of the documents signals that Brussels is prepared to push hard for structural changes.
How TikTok’s features turned into a regulatory flashpoint
Regulators have zeroed in on the mechanics that made TikTok a cultural phenomenon, arguing that the same tools that fuel viral trends also encourage compulsive use. The Commission’s analysis highlights infinite scroll, autoplaying videos, and a highly optimized algorithm that constantly serves fresh clips tailored to each user’s interests as core elements of the alleged addictive design. In its summary of the case, the Commission stresses that this algorithm is not a passive tool, but an active system that learns from every swipe to keep people watching.
The European Union’s concerns are not limited to adults who lose an evening to short videos. Officials say the design is particularly problematic for children and teenagers, who may be more susceptible to the constant rewards of new content. The European Union has publicly accused TikTok of breaching digital rules with these “addictive design” features, including autoplay and infinite scroll, in a case described in detail by The European Union. In parallel coverage, The EU is reported to have singled out TikTok’s personalized feeds, which feed users personalised content, as a central driver of the compulsive experience.
Safeguards that ‘are simply not enough’ for young users
Under pressure, TikTok has pointed to its time management tools and parental controls as evidence that it takes user wellbeing seriously. Yet the Commission’s interim view is that these measures fall short of what the law requires. Its assessment, cited in financial reporting, concludes that Its time management tools were “easy to dismiss” including for young users, and that parental controls required too much initiative from parents to introduce them, according to a detailed summary of Its findings. In other words, the tools exist, but they are too easy to ignore or never activate.
Critics inside the bloc have been even more blunt. In one widely cited account, journalist Raziye Akkoc reported that officials described the current protections as “simply not enough” to address the scale of the risks. The European Commission’s own language has been stark, with senior figures referring to “very serious interim findings” about the impact of TikTok’s design on children, a phrase that appears in a broadcast segment inviting viewers to Watch the explanation. For parents who have watched their children disappear into the app’s endless feed, the regulatory language will sound uncomfortably familiar.
From TikTok Lite Rewards to full‑scale DSA enforcement
The current showdown did not come out of nowhere. Earlier, the European Commission had already tested its enforcement muscle on TikTok through a narrower case focused on a gamified feature called TikTok Lite Rewards. That programme offered users points for watching videos and performing tasks, which could then be exchanged for vouchers, effectively layering a loyalty scheme on top of the existing engagement mechanics. Under scrutiny from DSA regulators, TikTok committed to permanently withdraw the TikTok Lite Rewards programme from the EU to comply with the Digital Services Act, a move that signalled how seriously the company took the threat of sanctions.
The Commission later confirmed that TikTok had followed through, with legal analysts noting that TikTok permanently ends TikTok Lite Rewards programme in EU for DSA Compliance after a formal process initiated by the European Commission. A separate Commission press note framed this as TikTok committing to permanently withdraw TikTok Lite Rewards programme from the EU, and warned against any attempt to introduce similar features that would circumvent the withdrawal, as set out in the Lite Rewards documentation. That episode now looks like a prelude to the broader challenge over the app’s fundamental design.
Billions at stake and a test case for global platform rules
Under the Digital Services Act, the financial stakes for TikTok are enormous. If the preliminary findings harden into a final decision and the company fails to comply, the Commission can impose fines of up to a significant percentage of global turnover, a power that has been highlighted in televised explainers noting that TikTok was charged in Feb with breaching EU online content rules and could face penalties tied to its worldwide revenue, as described in a video on the case. The European Union has put TikTok on notice that it must change its addictive design or face massive fines, according to a detailed summary of the warning from The European Union. For a platform whose business model depends on keeping users engaged, the cost of redesigning core features could be almost as significant as any monetary penalty.
Beyond the balance sheet, the case is emerging as a global reference point for how democracies regulate attention‑grabbing technology. Europe has framed the dispute as part of a broader effort to rein in very large online platforms, with officials in LONDON describing how The European Union on Friday accused TikTok of using addictive design that harms users, a stance captured in a detailed wire from Friday. Europe as a whole has been described as accusing TikTok of addictive design and pushing for change, with no fixed timeline yet for a final decision, according to a regional overview that notes how Europe is using this case to set expectations for other platforms.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
