Evidence is mounting that the same basic chemistry that made Earth habitable is unfolding, or once unfolded, on Mars. From complex organics to minerals linked with microbial activity, the Red Planet is starting to look less like a dead world and more like a place where life’s recipe was at least written down, even if we have not yet proved it was ever cooked.
As I trace the latest rover results and lab experiments, a pattern emerges: Mars holds organic carbon, reactive minerals, and even the ingredients for RNA, the genetic workhorse that may have preceded DNA on Earth. The question is shifting from whether Mars ever had the right components to whether those components were assembled into something alive.
Earth’s origin story is being rewritten in the lab
To understand why Mars is suddenly back at the center of the life debate, I start with the changing picture of how life began on Earth. For decades, biologists argued over whether proteins, DNA, or something else came first, but a growing body of work now points to an “RNA world,” in which strands of RNA both stored information and catalyzed reactions before more complex biology evolved. New experiments show that key RNA building blocks can form under realistic early Earth conditions, strengthening the idea that primitive chemistry, not a one-in-a-trillion miracle, launched biology.
Those experiments do not stop at Earth’s shoreline. Researchers have shown that Impacts with large asteroids could have delivered the same ingredients to Mars, where an early ocean and thick atmosphere once existed. If the RNA world model is right, then the chemistry that seeded life here was not unique to our planet, and Mars becomes a natural test case for whether that chemistry inevitably leads to biology or can stall at a prebiotic stage.
Asteroids may have seeded both planets with RNA ingredients
In parallel with the RNA world work, planetary scientists are dissecting meteorites to see what they carried to the young inner solar system. A billion year old asteroid fragment has revealed that complex organic molecules and boron rich minerals can survive violent journeys and still arrive intact on a rocky world. Those boron compounds help stabilize ribose, a fragile sugar that is central to RNA, which makes them a crucial part of any plausible path from simple carbon chemistry to genetic polymers.
What catches my attention is that the same study notes that similar asteroid Scientists say also struck Mars during its early history. That means Mars, like Earth, was showered with RNA precursors and borates, and the report explicitly links those impacts to the possibility that RNA chemistry could have taken hold on Mars as well. If both worlds were stocked with the same starter kit, then the divergence between a blue, living Earth and a cold, dusty Mars becomes a question of environment and timing rather than ingredients.
Curiosity’s organic carbon haul changed the stakes
For years, the main argument against Martian life was that the planet seemed chemically barren. That picture shifted when NASA’s Curiosity rover began drilling into ancient mudstones in Gale Crater and performing detailed measurement of carbon bearing compounds. Curiosity’s instruments showed that Organic carbon is present in Martian rocks in measurable quantities, not just as isolated traces, and that the inventory includes a mix of molecules that on Earth would be associated with biological or at least habitable environments.
More recently, Curiosity drilled into a rock target nicknamed “Still” in a region called “Mar” and detected long chain alkanes, the largest organic compounds yet found on Mars. These molecules, discovered in the Mar sample, are intriguing because on Earth similar chains can be produced by living organisms or by non biological processes that still require liquid water and energy. The presence of such complex organics does not prove life, but it does show that Mars can preserve delicate carbon chemistry for billions of years, which is exactly what any search for ancient biology needs.
Perseverance is chasing potential biosignatures in Jezero Crater
While Curiosity works in Gale Crater, NASA’s Perseverance rover is exploring Jezero Crater, a site chosen because it once hosted a lake and river delta. Perseverance has already found that its landing site contains organic molecules in multiple rock types, and mission scientists describe these as some of the most compelling organic matter yet detected on Mars. According to Results from the rover’s instruments, the concentration and diversity of these molecules raise the possibility that they were shaped by biological processes, although purely chemical explanations remain on the table.
The rover’s cameras and spectrometers have also zeroed in on a reddish rock dubbed “Cheyava Falls,” where Perseverance spotted leopard like spots that could represent mineralized microbial colonies or unusual chemical textures. NASA reports that NASA’s Perseverance rover discovered these leopard spots in Jezero Crater and is treating them as a potential biosignature, while carefully emphasizing that other explanations are being considered. The cautious language reflects how high the bar is for claiming life, but the very fact that the word “biosignature” is now in play for a specific Martian rock marks a turning point.
Minerals that look like the work of microbes
Beyond organics, Perseverance is uncovering minerals that on Earth often form in the presence of microbes. A detailed analysis of Jezero samples found a combination of vivianite, greigite, sulfur, and olivine that, taken together, looks strikingly similar to mineral assemblages created by sulfur eating bacteria in terrestrial lakes and river deltas. The analysis argues that these minerals likely formed in an environment where groundwater interacted with sediments in a way that could have supported microbes, especially along the ancient river that once fed Jezero Crater’s lake.
Another study of the same region used X ray and Raman and spectroscopy to identify two distinct minerals, appearing as pink and green spots on a Martian rock, that are consistent with past water rich, potentially habitable conditions. Researchers note that Using X ray and Raman and spectroscopy, Perseverance compared these Martian minerals to deposits associated with extremophiles in the Arctic circle. The match does not prove that microbes once lived in Jezero, but it shows that the rocks preserve the same kind of chemical gradients that microbes on Earth love to exploit.
Cheyava Falls and the “Martian meals” hypothesis
Among all of Perseverance’s targets, Cheyava Falls has become a focal point because of how its textures resemble something being eaten. High resolution images show dark, rounded spots dotting the rock surface, surrounded by lighter material, a pattern that some researchers have likened to microbial colonies digesting their surroundings. One detailed examination describes these as “Martian meals,” arguing that the spots and surrounding halos could record a process where microbes consumed nutrients carried by groundwater or a slow moving river.
The same work notes that Cheyava Falls sits along a path where a river once flowed downhill into Jezero’s lake, providing a steady supply of fresh chemistry for any potential organisms. A deep dive into the site explains that these Martian meals pattern, combined with the rock’s mineralogy, makes Cheyava Falls one of the best current candidates for preserved life on Mars. I find the argument compelling but not yet conclusive, especially since non biological corrosion or mineral growth can sometimes mimic biological textures.
Did life’s chemistry start on Mars and come here?
As the Martian evidence grows, some scientists are revisiting a provocative idea: that life’s chemistry may have started on Mars and then arrived on Earth via meteorites. A decade ago, researchers argued that the Red Planet might have been a better cradle for early biology because it had the right mix of oxidized minerals to stabilize organic molecules at a time when Earth was still geologically violent. In that view, Mars was the first habitable world, and Earth only became biologically rich after receiving Martian rocks that already contained complex chemistry or even primitive cells.
One prominent advocate of this scenario, Prof Steven Benner, has been quoted explaining that the Red Planet may have offered a more stable environment for prebiotic chemistry than early Earth. He points to minerals that can help assemble RNA and other biomolecules, arguing that Mars had them in abundance at the right time. If that is correct, then the organic carbon, borates, and RNA ingredients now being cataloged by rovers and meteorite studies are not just parallel experiments, they could be the remnants of the very chemistry that ultimately seeded life here.
“The same recipe” on both worlds
Recent commentary on Mars exploration has leaned into a striking phrase: the same recipe that created life on Earth may exist on Mars. Researchers note that ancient Martian rocks contain many of the same elements and minerals that early Earth used to build RNA, proteins, and cell membranes, including phosphorus, nitrogen, and iron rich compounds. They argue that if you list the key steps in life’s origin, from simple organics to self replicating molecules, Mars checks off more boxes than anyone expected when the first landers saw a dry, oxidized desert.
Reports on this theme emphasize that The Same Recipe That Created Life on Earth May Exist on Mars, Scientists Say, and that many of the ancient Martian environments now being reconstructed would have been chemically familiar to early Earth microbes. A parallel account notes that Earth May Exist with a twin in terms of prebiotic chemistry, again stressing that Mars shares the same basic ingredients and conditions. I see this convergence as a sign that planetary science and origin of life research are finally speaking the same language, with Mars serving as a second laboratory for testing Earth based theories.
Why scientists are still cautious about calling it life
Despite the excitement, mission leaders are careful not to overstate what has been found. Organic molecules, mineral patterns, and intriguing textures can all arise from non biological processes, especially on a planet that has been bombarded by radiation and reshaped by volcanism. Perseverance’s own science team has stressed that its instruments, powerful as they are, cannot deliver a “slam dunk” proof of life on their own, because they lack the ability to sequence molecules or culture microbes the way a lab on Earth can.
One assessment of the rover’s capabilities notes that Perseverance’s suite of instruments is limited in what it can study, and that definitive answers will likely require returning samples to Earth. That caution is echoed by Katie Stack Morgan, a project scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, who has acknowledged that claims about Martian life must be backed by rigorous, transparent analysis. In a discussion of chemical signatures on Mars, she is quoted as saying that her team at Katie Stack Morgan’s NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, or JPL, in Southern California showed their work to be scientifically rigorous, underscoring how high the evidentiary bar remains.
What the next decade of Mars exploration needs to do
Given how much chemistry Mars is already revealing, the next logical step is to bring carefully selected rocks and soils back to Earth. Perseverance is caching cores from Jezero Crater specifically so that a future mission can retrieve them and fly them home, where laboratories can search for complex organic structures, isotopic patterns, and microfossils at resolutions no rover can match. If those samples show clear signs of fractionated carbon, cell like shapes, or repeating polymers, the case for past life will strengthen dramatically.
At the same time, I think the community will need to refine its criteria for what counts as a biosignature in a world where “life like” chemistry can emerge without biology. The growing catalog of Martian organics, minerals, and textures suggests that Earth’s life making chemistry is not unique, but whether that chemistry crossed the threshold into biology on Mars is still an open question. As more data arrive from Curiosity’s work at “Still” and “Mar,” from Perseverance’s ongoing survey of Jezero, and from future landers, the line between life and chemistry on Mars may finally come into focus, revealing whether our planet’s story is a cosmic exception or part of a broader pattern.
More from Morning Overview