Finnish startup Donut Lab has pushed back against accusations from online critics that its solid-state battery technology is a fraud, with CEO Marko Lehtimäki pledging that third-party testing and real-world product deliveries will settle the debate. The company, which has been linked to electric motorcycle maker Verge in reporting about potential commercialization, has drawn intense skepticism from battery industry observers who note a lack of publicly disclosed performance data. As global demand for better electric vehicle batteries accelerates, the outcome of this dispute carries weight well beyond a single company’s reputation.
Bold Claims Meet Fierce Skepticism
Donut Lab has described its solid-state battery as a breakthrough capable of dramatically improving the range and charging speed of electric vehicles. The technology, if it performs as advertised, would represent a significant leap over the lithium-ion cells that currently dominate the EV market. Solid-state batteries replace the liquid electrolyte found in conventional cells with a solid material, which in theory allows for higher energy density and faster charging without the same fire risks. Dozens of companies worldwide, from Toyota to QuantumScape, have spent billions chasing this goal, but large-scale commercial production remains elusive.
What separates Donut Lab from most competitors is the speed and confidence of its public claims relative to the evidence it has shared. At the time of its initial announcements, the company had not released detailed performance metrics, cell chemistry specifications, or independent lab results. That gap between promise and proof triggered sharp criticism online and within the battery research community, where observers openly used the word “scam” to describe the venture. The absence of disclosed data became the central point of contention, turning what might have been routine startup skepticism into a full-blown credibility crisis.
CEO Rejects Fraud Label, Points to Proof
Lehtimäki has not shied away from the controversy. In comments reported by a major U.S. newspaper, the CEO directly rejected the “scam” framing that critics have applied to his company. His argument is straightforward: proof will come through actual product deliveries, battery pack teardowns by outside parties, and formal third-party validation. Rather than releasing cherry-picked lab numbers, Lehtimäki has said the company intends to let physical hardware and independent testing speak for it.
That strategy is a calculated bet. In the battery world, startups that delay data disclosure often face a credibility death spiral, where each week without evidence feeds the narrative that there is nothing real behind the marketing. Lehtimäki appears to be wagering that a single definitive round of independent results will carry more weight than a slow drip of company-generated figures. The risk is obvious: if the testing timeline slips or the results disappoint, the “scam” label could become permanent regardless of the underlying technology’s merits.
VTT Testing as the Make-or-Break Moment
The company has pointed to Finland’s VTT Technical Research Centre as a potential venue for independent evaluation of its cells. VTT is a state-owned applied research organization with decades of experience in materials science and energy technology, and its involvement lends a degree of institutional credibility that Donut Lab currently lacks on its own. A positive result from VTT would not guarantee commercial success, but it would force critics to reckon with hard numbers rather than speculation.
No public timeline for VTT’s findings has been confirmed in available reporting, and no preliminary results have been disclosed. That information gap is itself a source of tension. Independent battery researchers have noted that validation of solid-state cells typically requires not just energy density measurements but also cycle life testing, which can take months. A single charge-discharge test tells you how much energy a cell holds; hundreds or thousands of cycles tell you whether it will still work after years of real use. Until VTT publishes results covering both dimensions, the scientific community is unlikely to shift its assessment.
Why the Verge Partnership Matters
Donut Lab’s collaboration with Verge Motorcycles adds a practical dimension to the story. Verge, also based in Finland, produces high-end electric motorcycles and has signaled interest in integrating Donut Lab’s cells into its vehicles. If that integration moves forward, it would provide the most tangible form of proof available: real products, in real customer hands, running on the disputed battery technology. Teardowns by independent mechanics and reviewers could follow, creating a public record that would be difficult to sustain through marketing alone.
Yet no official statement from Verge confirming specific integration timelines or technical milestones has surfaced in available reporting. The partnership remains, for now, a stated intention rather than a delivered product. This distinction matters because the battery industry is littered with announced partnerships that quietly dissolved when the underlying technology failed to meet expectations. Until Verge ships a motorcycle with Donut Lab cells inside, the collaboration functions more as a signal of intent than as evidence of capability.
What a Validated Breakthrough Would Change
If VTT testing confirms that Donut Lab’s solid-state cells perform at or near the company’s claims, the implications extend well beyond one Finnish startup. Europe has spent years trying to build a domestic battery supply chain that can compete with established Asian manufacturers in China, South Korea, and Japan. A European company demonstrating scalable solid-state production could shift investment patterns and policy incentives across the continent. Public initiatives aimed at strengthening regional cell manufacturing would likely point to such a result as evidence that homegrown innovation can close the gap with entrenched rivals.
The flip side is equally significant. A high-profile failure, or even a prolonged inability to produce verifiable results, would damage confidence in European battery startups more broadly. Investors and policymakers who have backed the idea of homegrown alternatives to Chinese cell production would face harder questions about where to direct limited resources. The battery industry already carries scars from past overpromises, most notably the long and troubled road faced by several solid-state ventures that announced breakthroughs years ago but have yet to ship commercial products at scale.
A Test Case for Trust in Climate Tech
For now, the story of Donut Lab sits at an uncomfortable midpoint. The company has made extraordinary claims. Its CEO has publicly staked his credibility on upcoming proof. Independent testing by a respected institution has been discussed by the company as a key next step. But until that proof arrives in a form the scientific and commercial communities can examine, the gap between ambition and evidence remains the defining feature of this dispute. The battery world has learned, through hard experience, that charismatic founders and sleek prototypes are no substitute for reproducible data.
The Donut Lab saga has therefore become a test case for how the climate-tech ecosystem handles bold but unverified promises. If rigorous third-party results and real-world products eventually back up the company’s assertions, critics will have to recalibrate their reflexive skepticism, and the episode may be remembered as a painful but necessary demonstration of due diligence. If, on the other hand, the data never materialize or fall far short of expectations, the backlash could harden investor caution and make it more difficult for legitimate innovators to raise capital. In either scenario, the outcome will help define where the line is drawn between healthy doubt and paralyzing distrust in the race to decarbonize transportation.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
