Metal 3D printing has long promised aerospace-grade parts at desktop scale, but titanium has stubbornly resisted that vision. A new approach called cold metal fusion is changing that equation, turning titanium from a finicky, high-temperature headache into a material that can be printed with the repeatability and cost profile of plastic parts. As the technology moves from European pioneers to North American production lines, the barriers that once kept titanium in specialist labs are starting to fall away.
Instead of relying on lasers and molten pools, cold metal fusion uses polymer-bound powders and low-temperature printing to create “green” parts that are later transformed into dense metal through sintering. That shift in process design is what now makes 3D printing titanium feel less like experimental metallurgy and more like a scalable manufacturing method.
Why titanium has been so hard to print
Titanium is prized for its strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility, but those same traits come with a punishing process window when it is printed with traditional metal 3D printers. In laser-based systems, titanium becomes more reactive at high temperatures, tends to crack as it cools, and can absorb oxygen and nitrogen that embrittle the part, which is why operators often rely on expensive inert gas systems and tightly controlled atmospheres to keep the material in line. The result is that titanium printing has historically been slow, capital intensive, and unforgiving, especially for smaller manufacturers that cannot afford to scrap parts.
Cold metal fusion sidesteps many of those issues by keeping the printing step itself below the temperatures where titanium misbehaves, then moving the real metallurgy into a separate furnace cycle. Reporting on titanium’s behavior in conventional systems notes that the metal becomes more reactive at high temperatures and can crack on cooling, while also picking up impurities that weaken the part, which is exactly the pain point this new process is designed to avoid by decoupling shaping from high-temperature exposure and limiting the time titanium spends in its most reactive state, as highlighted in coverage of how Titanium behaves under laser-based printing.
What cold metal fusion actually is
At its core, cold metal fusion is a sinter-based additive manufacturing process that borrows heavily from metal injection molding and polymer powder-bed printing. Instead of melting metal powder with a laser, the system spreads a blend of metal particles and polymer binder, then selectively fuses the binder so the metal grains are locked into a solid “green” part while the surrounding powder stays loose. The printed component is then removed, cleaned of excess powder, and placed in a furnace where the binder is burned out and the metal particles sinter into a dense, fully metallic structure.
Technical descriptions of Cold Metal Fusion explain that the polymer binder melts and bonds the metal powder during printing, creating a stable green part that can be handled and depowdered before sintering. The process is described as an innovative additive manufacturing technology developed by Headmade Materia, with the CMF workflow explicitly framed as a bridge between the design freedom of 3D printing and the throughput of established sinter-based production. That hybrid identity is what makes CMF particularly well suited to titanium, which benefits from being shaped at low temperature and only exposed to high heat in a controlled furnace environment.
How CMF differs from laser and SLS metal printing
From the outside, cold metal fusion can look similar to selective laser sintering, since both rely on powder beds and layer-by-layer part formation. Under the hood, however, CMF replaces lasers and molten pools with a binder-based approach that keeps the printing chamber relatively cool, which sharply reduces thermal gradients and residual stresses in the part. That difference not only improves process stability, it also allows CMF to run on hardware that is closer in cost and complexity to polymer SLS systems rather than the heavy, laser-intensive machines used in direct metal printing.
Technical notes on About Cold Metal Fusion CMF describe CMF as a low cost alternative to direct SLS printing of metals, emphasizing that Cold Metal Fusion technology (CMF) uses a polymer binder and that the unbound powder can be reused in next prints. That reuse of powder and the absence of high-power lasers are central to the cost and sustainability advantages CMF claims over traditional SLS and direct metal laser sintering, especially when working with expensive alloys like titanium.
Inside the “cold” part of cold metal fusion
The “cold” in cold metal fusion does not mean there is no heat involved, but rather that the printing step itself occurs at relatively low temperatures compared with laser-based metal processes. In CMF systems, the powder bed is typically kept below the point where the metal would begin to melt, and only the polymer binder is softened or fused to define the part geometry. That keeps the thermal load on the machine and the part modest, which reduces warping, eliminates the need for elaborate support structures, and makes it easier to stack parts densely in the build volume.
Explainers on the technology note that the printing occurs under 80 degrees Celsius, with the metal powder remaining solid while only the binder is activated, and that any old surplus powder can simply be reused, as detailed in coverage of But how CMF can be both “sinter-based” and “cold” at the same time. That low-temperature printing window is particularly important for titanium, which is notoriously sensitive to thermal cycling and contamination when processed in molten form.
From green part to finished titanium component
Once a titanium part has been printed in CMF as a green body, the real metallurgy begins. The component is first cleaned of loose powder, often with simple brushing or blasting, then placed in a debinding step where the polymer is removed without disturbing the metal skeleton. After that, the part enters a sintering furnace where temperature and atmosphere are carefully controlled so the titanium particles fuse into a dense, near-net-shape component that shrinks predictably from its green dimensions.
Process descriptions from equipment providers explain that How Metal 3D Printing with ColdMetalFusion Works is very similar to metal injection molding, with CMF producing a green part that is then debound and sintered, resulting in fully metal components. That alignment with a mature industrial process is crucial for titanium, because it means engineers can lean on established sintering profiles and shrinkage data rather than reinventing the metallurgy from scratch for every new geometry.
Why titanium is a natural fit for CMF
Titanium’s biggest liabilities in laser-based printing become strengths in a sinter-based workflow. Because CMF keeps the metal solid during printing, there is no molten pool to react with oxygen or nitrogen, and the risk of hot cracking is pushed into a tightly controlled furnace cycle where temperature ramps and atmospheres can be tuned. The ability to print without supports, combined with predictable shrinkage during sintering, also opens the door to lightweight lattice structures and complex internal channels that would be difficult or impossible to machine.
Analyses of titanium in additive manufacturing point out that the metal becomes more reactive at high temperatures and tends to crack when the printed part cools, and that it can also become contaminated if the atmosphere is not carefully controlled, which is why conventional systems rely on inert gas and strict process windows, as described in reports on how Dec and Metal printing workflows are being adapted for titanium in North America. By shifting the critical high-temperature phase into a furnace that can be optimized for titanium’s behavior, CMF effectively turns a once temperamental material into something that can be handled with the same repeatability as stainless steel or tool steels in other sinter-based systems.
From Europe to North America: CMF’s industrial rollout
Cold metal fusion did not emerge in a vacuum; it was developed by Headmade Materia and first proven in European applications before being exported to other markets. Early adopters used CMF to replace machined or cast parts with printed equivalents, often in industries where weight reduction and design freedom justified the shift. Those initial deployments helped validate the process window, shrinkage behavior, and mechanical properties of CMF parts, including titanium components that had to meet demanding performance standards.
Coverage of the technology’s expansion notes that CADmore Metal is bringing the approach to North America, with Dec and Metal explicitly linked to the rollout of CMF systems and services that include equipment, training, and technical support for manufacturers looking to adopt the process, as described in reporting on how Introduction of CMF is being framed for new markets. That cross-Atlantic transfer is significant for titanium users, because it means the process is no longer confined to a handful of European pilot lines but is being packaged as a production-ready option for North American aerospace, medical, and industrial suppliers.
Sturdy Cycles and the bike industry’s titanium pivot
One of the clearest real-world tests of CMF for titanium comes from the cycling sector, where weight, stiffness, and durability are non-negotiable. Sturdy Cycles, a high-end bike maker, has shifted production of titanium parts to additive manufacturing using CMF, betting that the process can deliver both performance and repeatability. For a brand that trades on ride quality and bespoke geometry, any change in manufacturing method is a high-stakes decision, which makes its move into CMF a strong signal of confidence in the technology.
Reports on the company’s transition explain that the advantages of the CMF technology are mainly reflected in the excellent process stability and the resulting repeatability, with Jan cited in connection with the decision and CMF identified as the core process enabling the switch, as detailed in coverage of how Jan and CMF intersect in Sturdy Cycles’ production strategy. For titanium, that kind of validation in a consumer-facing, performance-critical product category is a powerful proof point that CMF parts can stand up to real-world abuse, not just lab testing.
What service bureaus and adopters are saying
As CMF spreads, service bureaus and contract manufacturers are becoming key gatekeepers for titanium users who do not want to invest in their own equipment. These firms are in a unique position to compare CMF with laser-based metal printing and metal injection molding, since many of them run multiple technologies under one roof. Their feedback so far has focused on CMF’s ability to combine design flexibility with more predictable economics, especially for mid-volume production where tooling for casting or MIM would be hard to justify.
Commentary from practitioners such as John Carrington frames Cold Metal Fusion as a game changer in metal 3D printing, with explanations that you print a green part and then take that green part and sinter it to achieve final properties. Service providers like Jawstec describe CMF as an innovative manufacturing process that bridges the flexibility of 3D printing with the reliability of sinter-based production, explicitly asking What Cold Metal Fusion is and positioning CMF as a way to deliver both flexibility and Reliability. For titanium customers, that combination of flexibility and reliability is often the deciding factor in whether to move a part from machining or casting into additive manufacturing.
Cost, sustainability, and the powder question
Beyond technical performance, CMF’s economics and sustainability profile are central to its appeal for titanium. Metal powder is expensive, and in laser-based systems a significant fraction of that powder can be degraded by repeated exposure to high temperatures and laser energy, which limits how often it can be reused. CMF’s low-temperature printing step, by contrast, leaves the unbound powder largely untouched, which makes it easier to recycle and reduces material waste, a particularly important factor when the powder is titanium rather than a cheaper alloy.
Technical overviews of CMF emphasize that Cold Metal Fusion technology (CMF) is a low cost alternative to direct SLS printing of metals and that the unbound powder can be reused in next prints, as detailed in the Cold Metal Fusion documentation. When that reuse is combined with the absence of high-power lasers and the ability to run CMF on hardware derived from polymer SLS systems, the total cost of ownership for titanium printing starts to look far more accessible, especially for mid-sized manufacturers that previously saw metal additive as out of reach.
More from MorningOverview