Morning Overview

Climate change threatens U.S. drinking water supply and safety

Key takeaways: Climate change is (1) shrinking and destabilizing U.S. water supplies, (2) worsening source-water quality through harmful algal blooms and wildfire-related contamination, and (3) increasing stress on drinking-water infrastructure and utilities—especially for small systems and private well users with fewer protections.

Rising temperatures are altering the water cycle across the United States, shrinking the supplies that tens of millions of Americans depend on for drinking water while simultaneously degrading its quality. Federal research now documents a convergence of threats, from long-term drying in the West to toxic algal blooms and wildfire-driven contamination, that together strain utilities and leave private well users with few protections. The gap between available supply and growing demand is widening, and the safety risks are compounding faster than most water systems can adapt.

Warming Is Reshaping the Water Cycle

Warming temperatures, shifting precipitation patterns, and increased evapotranspiration are redrawing the map of where and when water is available. A federal synthesis published by the U.S. Geological Survey examines projected and observed changes across every major component of the water cycle, including streamflow, soil moisture, groundwater recharge, snow and ice cover, and lake and wetland levels. The picture that emerges is not one of uniform decline but of growing volatility: some regions face heavier precipitation events that overwhelm infrastructure, while others confront chronic drying that depletes reservoirs and aquifers year after year. These shifts complicate long-standing assumptions about “normal” conditions that engineers and planners have relied on to size reservoirs, design treatment plants, and plan for emergency supplies.

The Colorado River Basin illustrates how these shifts translate into real supply shortfalls. The basin provides drinking water to tens of millions of people across the Southwest, yet sustained drought and what scientists increasingly describe as long-term aridification, rather than a temporary dry spell, are eroding its capacity. The USGS has drawn a clear distinction between drought and aridification in the basin, warning that the region may be transitioning to a structurally drier climate rather than cycling through a recoverable shortage. Under median assumptions, the Bureau of Reclamation’s 2012 Basin Study projected a supply-demand imbalance of approximately 3.2 million acre-feet annually by 2060, a gap that aridification could widen further. A separate USGS report on science gaps in the Colorado River Basin documents how uncertainty in precipitation forecasts and groundwater data complicates planning for the communities that rely on this water, underscoring that managers are being asked to make high-stakes decisions with incomplete information.

Toxic Blooms and Wildfire Ash Threaten Tap Water Safety

Even where water remains physically available, its quality is deteriorating in ways that challenge treatment plants. Warmer surface waters and nutrient-laden runoff from storms are fueling more frequent harmful algal blooms. Cyanobacteria in these blooms produce toxins that can contaminate drinking-water intakes, and the EPA has documented that algal toxins are increasingly affecting source waters, forcing utilities to adopt new, often expensive removal techniques. For many systems, that has meant adding advanced treatment steps such as activated carbon or ozone, upgrading monitoring programs, and issuing more frequent advisories when toxin levels spike. These responses carry significant costs that can be especially burdensome for small utilities with limited ratepayer bases.

The public health stakes are direct and sometimes counterintuitive. The CDC warns that boiling contaminated water does not remove algal toxins and can actually concentrate them, meaning standard household responses to water advisories may backfire during a bloom event. Residents who assume they can “fix” questionable tap water on their own may unknowingly increase their exposure risk. At the same time, utilities must communicate rapidly evolving conditions to customers who may be skeptical of official assurances, especially in communities with a history of water-quality violations. This combination of technical and trust challenges turns harmful algal blooms into both an engineering and a public communication crisis.

Wildfires present a different but equally serious contamination pathway. Peer-reviewed research has shown that major fires can introduce volatile organic compounds such as benzene into drinking-water distribution systems, with contamination persisting for months after a fire across sampled service connections. The mechanism involves heat damage to plastic pipes, infiltration of smoke and ash, and depressurization of water lines during firefighting, conditions that allow contaminated air and fluids to be drawn into buried infrastructure. Once inside, these chemicals can adhere to pipe walls and slowly leach back into flowing water, making it difficult to restore safe service quickly even after flames are extinguished.

Private well owners face even steeper risks in fire-prone landscapes. Field sampling after wildfires has revealed pressure loss, physical damage, and debris-related contaminants in household systems, along with significant gaps in official guidance for well users trying to determine whether their water is safe. Unlike regulated community systems, private wells generally fall outside federal drinking water standards, leaving homeowners to navigate testing and treatment on their own. In practice, that can mean weeks or months of uncertainty about whether water is suitable for drinking, cooking, or even bathing. For low-income households and rural communities without easy access to alternative supplies, the combination of wildfire damage and limited support can turn a natural disaster into a long-term public health emergency.

Drought Squeezes Utilities From Both Sides

Drought does not just reduce the volume of water available; it simultaneously increases the demand utilities must meet. When reservoirs and aquifers drop, customers often use more water for irrigation and cooling, while utilities draw from lower-quality sources that require additional treatment. The EPA has noted that during a drought, water utilities face a loss of supply paired with rising customer demand, a squeeze that can overwhelm systems designed for more stable conditions. That dual pressure is especially acute in fast-growing Western cities where population increases are layered on top of declining base flows, forcing utilities to choose between aggressive conservation measures, costly new infrastructure, or both.

Climate change also threatens the physical infrastructure that moves and treats water. Extreme heat can damage pumps and electrical systems, while more intense storms can inundate treatment plants and overwhelm combined sewers. Power outages during hurricanes, atmospheric rivers, or ice storms can halt operations entirely, leaving communities under boil-water advisories or without service. The EPA provides planning tools for utilities facing these climate-amplified hazards, including templates for emergency response and guidance on backup power. Yet the agency’s programs tend to reach larger municipal systems with the staff and budgets to apply detailed resilience frameworks. Smaller utilities and the millions of households on private wells often lack access to the same technical support, raising the risk that federal adaptation efforts may inadvertently widen the gap between well-resourced urban systems and vulnerable rural ones.

Adaptation Tools Exist but Reach Remains Uneven

Federal agencies have built planning frameworks to help water systems prepare for a hotter, more volatile climate. Within EPA, the Creating Resilient Water Utilities initiative promotes climate resilience planning tools, including scenario-based risk assessments, financial planning worksheets, and case studies from systems that have already begun adapting. These resources encourage utilities to stress-test their operations against combinations of drought, flooding, and heat, and to identify investments—such as diversifying water sources, hardening critical facilities, or expanding conservation programs—that can reduce vulnerability over time. Some utilities have used these tools to justify upgrades like elevating electrical equipment above projected flood levels or adding advanced treatment to cope with algal toxins.

Yet a growing body of research suggests that utility-level understanding of climate threats varies widely, with many smaller systems lacking the staff capacity, data, or funding to translate high-level guidance into concrete projects. Rural and tribal systems, in particular, may struggle to access grants or technical assistance, even as they face some of the most severe impacts from drought, wildfire, and contamination. Private well owners sit even further outside this framework, often relying on informal networks, local health departments, or nonprofit organizations for information about emerging risks. Bridging this divide will require not only expanding the reach of existing federal tools, but also tailoring support to the realities of small systems and households that lack engineering staff or dedicated resilience budgets.

As climate change accelerates, the combined pressures of shrinking supplies, rising demand, and worsening contamination will test the nation’s drinking water systems in ways that existing regulations and infrastructure were never designed to handle. The science now clearly links warming to shifts in the water cycle, degraded source quality, and heightened infrastructure stress. Whether Americans continue to enjoy reliable, safe tap water will depend on how quickly utilities, regulators, and communities can translate that science into targeted investments and protective policies—especially for those on the front lines who currently have the fewest resources to adapt.

More from Morning Overview

*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.