China’s space establishment has moved from watching SpaceX’s Starship from afar to trying to match, and in some cases directly emulate, its most audacious ideas. What began as a cautious state program built around conservative rockets is now tilting toward fully reusable giants, stainless steel test vehicles and private startups that openly pattern their designs on Elon Musk’s flagship.
I see a clear pattern emerging: Chinese planners have decided that if they want a permanent foothold on the Moon and a serious role in the deep-space economy, they cannot ignore the Starship template. Instead, they are racing to adapt it, scale it and fold it into a broader national strategy that treats heavy lift and reusability as core infrastructure rather than experimental side projects.
From cautious latecomer to copy‑and‑compete challenger
For years, Beijing framed its space program as a methodical climb, stressing that China was still in the “initial stage” of space‑station technology compared with older powers. That humility has not disappeared, but it now sits alongside a far more aggressive push to leapfrog in key areas, especially heavy‑lift rockets and reusability. The country’s leadership increasingly treats access to orbit and cislunar space as strategic infrastructure, on par with high‑speed rail or 5G, and that mindset is reshaping how it responds to Starship.
That shift is visible in the way officials talk about long‑term goals and the tools needed to reach them. Instead of being content with incremental upgrades to existing Long March vehicles, planners are backing new families of super‑heavy launchers and reusable boosters that echo the Starship philosophy of flying often and cheaply. The broader trajectory of China’s industrial policy, which favors large‑scale state support for strategic technologies, is now being applied to spaceflight in a way that makes copying, iterating and scaling Starship‑like concepts not just acceptable but expected.
Long March 9: Beijing’s state‑built Starship analogue
At the center of the state response sits The Long March 9, a super‑heavy rocket under development by the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology, or CALT. The Long March 9 is described as a Starship‑class launcher, and its planned height of 37 floors gives a sense of the scale Chinese engineers are targeting. The project marks a clear break from the expendable, kerosene‑fueled workhorses that carried earlier missions, signaling that Beijing wants its own answer to the fully reusable behemoth taking shape in South Texas.
Analysts who track the evolution of The Long March family note that this is not just another incremental upgrade but a structural pivot toward Starship‑style capabilities. Technical papers and overviews of new launchers from the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology describe how these heavy vehicles are meant to extend an already extensive rocket fleet into true deep‑space territory. When I look at those plans alongside the scale of Long March 9, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that the state has embraced a simple premise: if Starship defines the new upper bound of what a launch system can do, China intends to have something in that class.
Private startups: stainless steel and unabashed imitation
The state is not alone in chasing the Starship model. A growing ecosystem of private and quasi‑private firms is experimenting with stainless steel structures, methane engines and two‑stage reusable stacks that look strikingly familiar. Chinese media have highlighted how the Zhuque‑3, described as China’s first stainless steel liquid propellant rocket, was launched by a Chinese private aerospace company called LandSpace. That choice of material is not accidental; stainless steel is central to Starship’s design, and its adoption in Zhuque‑3 shows how deeply Musk’s engineering decisions are influencing Chinese hardware.
Reporting on the broader startup scene makes the pattern even clearer. One account describes how Several Chinese startups, including Cosmoleap, have proposed rockets that essentially copy Starship’s two‑stage, fully reusable concept. Another piece characterizes the trend bluntly, noting that a growing number of Chinese companies are trying to replicate Starship’s architecture, from its stainless steel hull to its methane engines. When I line up these examples, I see less a scattered set of imitators and more a coordinated wave of firms betting that the fastest way to catch up is to start from SpaceX’s blueprint and iterate.
Reusable heavy lift: China’s Starship‑like concepts on paper
Beyond individual rockets, Chinese planners are sketching out entire families of fully reusable heavy‑lift vehicles that mirror Starship’s role as a multipurpose workhorse. One prominent concept describes a heavy‑lift rocket with a capacity of 100 tons to low Earth orbit and 50 tons to lunar transfer orbit, explicitly framed as covering the launch needs for future crewed and cargo missions. The reference to low Earth orbit underlines how central Earth‑to‑orbit economics are to this strategy: if you can move 100 tons at a time, you can build space stations, lunar transfer depots and massive constellations far more efficiently.
These designs are not just about raw lift. They are explicitly described as fully reusable, with boosters and upper stages intended to return for refurbishment and rapid turnaround. That philosophy tracks closely with the way Starship is framed in overviews of future spacecraft, where analysts note that But perhaps the most anticipated and ambitious development in coming years is the Starship, precisely because of its promise of high‑frequency, low‑cost flights. When I compare those expectations with China’s heavy‑lift concepts, it is clear that Beijing is not just copying a rocket; it is trying to import an entire operating model built around reusability and scale.
Engines, landing tricks and the Falcon 9 learning curve
China’s fascination is not limited to Starship itself; it also extends to the technologies that made SpaceX’s earlier breakthroughs possible. Commentators dissect how SpaceX’s Falcon 9 pioneered propulsive landings and how its booster recovery techniques set the stage for Starship’s even more ambitious reuse. One analysis of the company’s “Megazilla” tower highlights how catching a returning booster was a major leap for engineers, arguing that This successful landing reinforced the idea that fully reusable rockets flying on a regular basis could become a reality. Chinese designers are watching those milestones closely as they sketch their own recovery systems.
Some of that influence is already visible in domestic projects. A video analysis of a recent incident involving the Shenzhou program notes that the event forced mission planners to reassign the Shenzhou‑21 spacecraft for the Shenzhou‑20 crew’s return, and goes on to describe how Chinese engineers are developing a reusable rocket similar to SpaceX’s Falcon 9. Another widely shared breakdown argues that China is up to Something Big to Copy both SpaceX Starship & Raptor Engines, framing this as a necessary step if the country wants a competitive commercial carrier rocket. When I connect these dots, I see a deliberate effort to absorb not just the headline‑grabbing vehicle, but the entire stack of enabling technologies from engine cycles to landing infrastructure.
Moon race pressure: Starship as both threat and template
The intensity of China’s Starship fixation is easier to understand when you look at the geopolitical clock ticking in the background. Analysts warn that Unless something changes, it is highly unlikely the United States will beat China’s projected timeline to the Moon’s south pole, especially given how central Starship has become to NASA’s own Artemis architecture. In that framing, Starship is both the American ace card and a potential vulnerability, since any delay or failure could open a window for Beijing to plant its flag first.
Chinese planners appear to be reading the same tea leaves. One detailed assessment of lunar plans notes that China’s long‑term ambitions now depend heavily on developing its own Starship‑like vehicle, while contrasting that with US policymakers who seem determined to force NASA to continue building the ultra‑expensive and expendable Space Launch Sy system for decades. Another discussion of the Moon race points out that The Chinese equivalent of a super‑heavy launcher is a copy of Starship, originally conceived as an expendable launcher similar to SLS but later reworked when it became clear that model was not going to do the job. From my vantage point, that evolution looks less like flattery and more like hard‑nosed strategic calculus: if Starship is what it takes to build a sustainable lunar presence, then China wants its own version as quickly as possible.
Policy walls and parallel ecosystems
One reason China is building its own Starship‑style ecosystem rather than partnering more deeply with existing players is that the policy walls are high and getting higher. Chinese astronauts are already excluded from the International Space Station, or ISS, because Washington has barred Nasa from working with China on space programs over national security concerns. That ban has forced Beijing to construct its own Tiangong station and to treat human spaceflight as an arena where it must be self‑reliant, from life‑support systems to launch vehicles.
Those restrictions also shape how Chinese engineers access and interpret Starship’s progress. Without formal cooperation, they rely on open‑source imagery, technical papers, commercial satellite shots and the global conversation around SpaceX’s test flights. At the same time, domestic commentary stresses that However the paths toward realizing these goals are still in their early stages, even as China’s technological demonstration initiatives move steadily forward. When I put those strands together, I see a country that is both constrained and galvanized by isolation, using Starship as a benchmark while building a parallel system that can operate independently of US‑led infrastructure.
Industrial scale and the “DeepSeek moment” for space
China’s broader industrial strategy helps explain why its Starship‑style ambitions feel so expansive. Commentators have described how the country’s infrastructure is entering a kind of “DeepSeek moment,” where large‑scale AI and computing projects are treated as national priorities and backed by heavy investment. In that context, spaceflight is increasingly framed as another pillar of high‑end infrastructure, with China emphasizing that it already has a solid foundation of industrial capacity even if the path to its most ambitious goals is still at an early stage.
That mindset dovetails neatly with the Starship model, which only makes economic sense if you can build, launch and refurbish vehicles at industrial scale. Policy analyses of the Chinese space program note that, Last but not least, new rocket launchers from the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology are meant to complement an already extensive rocket fleet that the country possesses. When I look at that fleet alongside the emerging stainless steel prototypes and heavy‑lift concepts, it is clear that Beijing is not just chasing prestige missions; it is trying to build a launch industrial base that can support everything from lunar bases to mega‑constellations in the same way Starship is meant to underpin a broader commercial ecosystem.
Why Starship became the yardstick
Underpinning all of this is a simple reality: Starship has become the reference point for what next‑generation spacecraft should look like. Technical overviews of the field emphasize that Starship is perhaps the most anticipated and ambitious development expected in the coming years, precisely because it promises to collapse launch costs and enable missions that were previously science fiction. In that environment, any country with serious space ambitions has to decide whether to compete with, collaborate around or ignore that benchmark, and ignoring it is not really an option.
China’s choice has been to compete and copy in parallel. Commentaries that track the country’s space race posture recall how, in earlier eras, officials stressed that China needed to soberly recognize its gaps in space‑station technology. Today, the tone is different: instead of dwelling on what it lacks, Beijing is pouring resources into Starship‑class rockets, stainless steel prototypes and reusable boosters that can close those gaps quickly. From my perspective, that is what makes the current moment so striking. China is not just fascinated by Starship as a marvel of engineering; it is treating the vehicle as a playbook, one it intends to follow, adapt and, if possible, outscale.
More from MorningOverview