China’s latest naval experiment looks deceptively simple: a snap-together “container” aircraft carrier that seems to turn ordinary cargo ships into launchpads for combat drones and jets. The concept, which mirrors the country’s broader obsession with modular design from flying cars to supercarriers, appears almost too easy to assemble compared with the hulking flat-tops that define traditional sea power. I see that apparent simplicity as the point, and as a warning, because it suggests a shift toward cheap, flexible platforms that are harder to track, easier to replace, and designed to overwhelm more exquisite fleets.
From flying cars to floating flight decks
China’s modular carrier idea does not come out of nowhere, it grows from a culture of snapping complex systems together in ways that blur civilian and military lines. At CES in Las Vegas, XPENG AEROHT, described as Asia’s largest flying car company, showed off a “Land Aircraft Carrier” concept that pairs a road-going truck with a detachable electric vertical takeoff and landing pod, treating the car itself as a mobile launch platform rather than a single integrated vehicle. The company framed this Land Aircraft Carrier at CES as a milestone in the evolution of transportation, and the language of modularity and carriers is strikingly similar to what is now appearing at sea.
At the same Consumer Electronic Show, video walk-throughs of the XPENG Land Aircraft Carrier highlighted how the flying module can be loaded onto a wheeled base, then detached and operated separately, with one clip from Jan showing the Xpang Aerot booth and another from Jan describing how the Chinese company Xpang has iterated its display. In one detailed breakdown, the cost of both modules in XPeng’s Modular eVTOL System was pegged at no higher than $400,000, a figure that underlines how modular design is being used to keep complex aerospace systems within a relatively accessible price band. When I look at that civilian ecosystem, from the XPENG AEROHT Land Aircraft Carrier to the XPeng AEROHT Flying Car & Land Aircraft Carrier clips from Jan that walk through the Consumer Electronic Show booth, I see the same design instincts now being applied to naval power.
The snap-together carrier that hides in plain sight
The modular aircraft carrier that has caught Western attention is not a classic flat-top but a container ship that can be reconfigured with bolt-on flight decks and catapult gear. Reporting on the project describes a ship type that is small, cheap, numerous, and easy to blend into global shipping lanes, a combination that planners in the Navy and USN regard as a nightmare because it complicates targeting and escalation. The idea is that standard hulls could be outfitted with mission modules, turning what looks like a freighter into a platform for launching aircraft or drones, and one detailed analysis of this container aircraft carrier concept stresses that this ship type, small, cheap, numerous, and easy to blend into global shipping lanes, is a planner’s nightmare for the Navy and USN.
Another assessment asks whether the Chinese have really conquered Emals, the electromagnetic aircraft launch system that has plagued the United States, to the point that they can mount it on such a modular platform. That report frames the question bluntly, asking whether the Chinese have overtaken the US in Emals technology and whether this snap-together carrier is proof that they have solved problems that dogged American decks. In that context, the snap-together container aircraft carrier is not just a quirky prototype but a test of whether China can integrate Emals-level systems into a modular hull, a point raised explicitly in a Jan analysis that wonders if the Chinese have really conquered Emals to a degree that challenges the USN.
Cargo ships turned drone flattops
The modular carrier idea is already visible in the conversion of civilian cargo ships into drone launch platforms, which is where the concept becomes operational rather than theoretical. Imagery of a Chinese freighter named Zhong Da 79 shows a large open deck and what analysts describe as a modular electromagnetic catapult, apparently designed to fling heavy drones into the air from a hull that still looks like a merchant ship from a distance. One detailed report on this Chinese cargo ship conversion notes that more images have emerged of the Zhong Da 79 freighter with an electromagnetic catapult, and that the timing coincides with a crescendo of major Chinese military technological developments, suggesting that this is part of a broader push to demonstrate the existence of such a capability on a civilian-looking hull, a point underscored in the description of the Chinese cargo ship.
Social media has amplified that picture, with analyst Mete Sohtao sharing that China has begun converting civilian cargo ships into floating platforms for launching combat drones, describing container ship Zhong Da 79 as equipped with a modular electromagnetic catapult, EMALS, designed to launch next-generation heavy drones, the Type-X CCA. In that post, Mete Sohtao highlights how China is using modular EMALS on a cargo ship to support the Type-X CCA, and the language of a modular electromagnetic catapult on a container ship shows how the same Emals technology that once belonged only on supercarriers is now being tested on converted freighters, a trend captured in the description shared by Mete Sohtao.
China’s carrier factory and the modular mindset
Behind these experiments sits a shipbuilding machine that is already turning out conventional carriers at a pace that has unsettled Washington. Analysts have noted that, on paper, China is building carriers faster than any nation in history, with the Fujian (Type 003) entering sea trials and a fourth carrier already taking shape, and that this tempo reflects a deliberate strategy to close the gap with the USN. In one detailed video analysis, the narrator states that on paper, China is building carriers faster than any nation in history, with the recent sea trials of the Fujian (Type 003), and that this is part of a broader naval race, a point that underscores how quickly China is scaling its carrier fleet.
The modular approach is baked into that industrial story, not just into the new container carrier. Earlier reporting on the Type 003 class noted that this new class, designated Type 003, is the first Chinese carrier constructed using a modern, modular construction method, with large pre-fabricated blocks assembled at the yard to speed production and simplify integration of complex systems like catapults and unmanned aerial vehicles. That same analysis stressed that Type 003 is the first Chinese carrier built with this modular method, and that it is designed to operate unmanned aerial vehicles from catapults, a combination that foreshadows the drone-heavy, modular flattops now emerging from converted cargo ships, as described in the assessment of the Type 003 Type 003 program.
Fujian, EMALS and the leap to modular catapults
The Fujian is the flagship of this new generation, and its design choices help explain why a modular carrier suddenly looks plausible. China’s most advanced aircraft carrier, the Fujian, has entered service after a commissioning ceremony that showcased its electromagnetic catapults, which allow aircraft to be launched at higher speeds than older ski-jump decks and are central to operating heavier jets and drones. Reporting on that commissioning notes that China’s most advanced aircraft carrier, the Fujian, has entered service and that its electromagnetic catapults allow aircraft to be launched at higher speeds, a detail that shows how China has moved EMALS from theory to operational hardware.
At the same time, some analysts argue that China’s supercarrier has a fatal design flaw, pointing to the Fujian as a ghost the Pentagon has been watching for years and questioning whether its power systems and catapults can deliver sustained sortie rates in combat conditions. One critical video describes how, for years, the Pentagon has been watching a ghost take shape on the horizon, China’s third aircraft carrier the Fujian, and labels it a supercarrier with a potential fatal design flaw, a phrase that captures the skepticism around whether this EMALS-heavy design can match American reliability, as discussed in the critique of the Fujian.
The “wacky” testbed and the cybertruck-style carrier
Not every Chinese carrier-like vessel fits neatly into existing categories, and that ambiguity is part of the strategy. A mysterious Chinese vessel with a large open flight deck, first highlighted by TWZ, has made its maiden voyage and looks more like a testbed than a frontline warship, with a layout that suggests experiments in drone operations, short takeoff aircraft, or even new launch systems that could later migrate to other hulls. The description of this mysterious Chinese vessel with a large open flight deck, which TWZ was first to report on, notes that it looks to have made its maiden voyage, and the very fact that such a puzzling ship exists shows how far China is willing to push unconventional carrier designs, as seen in the report on the Chinese testbed.
In the civilian realm, the XPENG AEROHT Land Aircraft Carrier has been described as “Cybertruck-like,” a modular road vehicle that carries a flying car pod and presents a blocky, futuristic silhouette that would not look out of place next to a stealthy naval hull. Coverage of its global debut at CES highlighted XPENG AEROHT as Asia’s largest flying car company and framed the Land Aircraft Carrier as a new milestone in transportation, with its modular flying car making a global debut that blends automotive and aerospace design. When I watch Jan’s footage from the Xpang Aerot booth and see the XPeng AEROHT Flying Car & Land Aircraft Carrier walk-through from Jan at the Consumer Electronic Show, I see the same design language that is now being tested at sea, a connection that is explicit in the description of the XPENG AEROHT Land Aircraft Carrier at CES and reinforced in the detailed tour of the Xpang display shared in the Jan clip on the Xpeng AEROHT Flying Car & Land Aircraft Carrier from the Consumer Electronic Show.
Racing toward a fourth carrier and nuclear power
While modular cargo conversions and wacky testbeds grab headlines, China is also pressing ahead with a more traditional fourth carrier that could be nuclear powered, which would dramatically extend its range and endurance. Military analysts have repeatedly discussed the gradual Chinese development of aircraft carriers and their underlying concepts, and recent reporting notes that the fourth carrier is taking shape with potential nuclear propulsion, electromagnetic aircraft launch systems (EMALS), and modern interception systems, a combination that would put it closer to USN supercarriers in capability. One detailed assessment from Dec states that Milit Aktuell has repeatedly discussed the gradual Chinese development of aircraft carriers and that this fourth carrier is expected to feature nuclear propulsion, EMALS, and modern interception systems, a sign that the Chinese navy is not content to stop at modular experiments.
At the same time, popular coverage has portrayed China’s new carriers as platforms that the whole US is afraid of, with one widely viewed video describing how China just unveiled a massive new aircraft carrier that is shaking things up in the global military scene. That clip from Sep frames the new carrier as a symbol of China’s rising naval power and suggests that its scale and technology are forcing the USN to rethink its assumptions, a narrative that dovetails with the more technical discussions of nuclear propulsion and EMALS on the fourth carrier, as seen in the portrayal of China’s new aircraft carrier that the whole US is afraid of in the Sep video.
Why “too easy” is the point, not a flaw
When I put these threads together, from XPENG’s Land Aircraft Carrier to Zhong Da 79 and the snap-together container carrier, the phrase “too easy to build” starts to look less like a criticism and more like a design objective. The modular container carrier is small, cheap, and numerous by design, and its ability to blend into global shipping lanes means that even if each individual hull is less capable than a Fujian-class supercarrier, the aggregate effect could be far more destabilizing for the Navy and USN. The question raised in Jan about whether the Chinese have really conquered Emals to the point of surpassing the US in Emals technology on a snap-together carrier is therefore not just about engineering pride, it is about whether the USN is prepared for a world in which EMALS-grade launch systems can be bolted onto what looks like a freighter, as highlighted in the analysis that asks if the Chinese have overtaken the US in Emals technology.
China’s carrier program, from the Type 003 modular construction method to the Fujian’s EMALS and the prospective nuclear-powered fourth carrier, shows a state that is comfortable iterating across a spectrum of platforms, some exquisite and some almost disposable. On paper, China is building carriers faster than any nation in history, and its willingness to experiment with wacky testbeds, Cybertruck-like Land Aircraft Carriers, and cargo ships with modular electromagnetic catapults suggests that the future of sea power may be defined less by a few iconic hulls and more by a swarm of adaptable platforms. In that sense, the fact that a modular aircraft carrier looks too easy to build is exactly what should worry planners in Washington, because it hints at a naval ecosystem where the hardest part is no longer constructing the ship, but figuring out which of the many innocuous silhouettes on the horizon is about to launch a wave of drones, a concern that hangs over every discussion of China’s wacky and puzzling carrier-like vessels and the broader trend of modular naval power, from the Type 003 003 to the Fujian and beyond.
More from Morning Overview