The race to Mars has quietly become the defining contest of twenty-first century spaceflight, pitting a state-backed Chinese program, a commercially driven SpaceX campaign, and a methodical NASA roadmap against the same unforgiving planet. Each player is chasing a different prize, from samples and robotic scouts to full-scale human settlement, and the timelines are starting to overlap. The question of who actually plants the first human boot in Martian dust is no longer abstract, it is a live strategic issue for the United States, China, and the private space industry.
China is building toward Mars through tightly sequenced national missions, SpaceX is trying to leapfrog with giant fully reusable rockets, and NASA is threading Mars preparation through its broader exploration agenda. I see three intertwined races emerging: who returns the first samples, who flies the first crewed flyby or orbital mission, and who attempts the first human landing. The answers to those three may not all be the same.
Three very different Mars endgames
China, SpaceX, and NASA are not actually chasing identical objectives, which is why the “who gets there first” question is more complicated than a simple finish line. The China National Space Administration, or CNSA, is focused first on robotic science and prestige milestones, including a Mars sample return and, later, a crewed presence in Martian orbit. Reporting on the Tianwen program describes a Tianwen-3 mission that would use two launches in 2028 to collect and bring back material from the surface, with the China National Space Administration explicitly targeting samples that could be examined for signs of life on the planet, a step that would cement China’s role in deep-space science if it succeeds.
SpaceX, by contrast, is explicit that its Mars endgame is settlement rather than a single flag-planting mission. The company’s own Mars campaign materials describe a plan to send the first uncrewed Starships to Mars in 2026, using those early flights to gather data on entry, descent, landing, and the logistics of cargo deliveries to the Martian surface, all in service of building up a transport system that can eventually move large numbers of people. NASA’s ambitions sit between these poles: the agency is on what it calls a journey to Mars, with a goal of sending humans to the Red Planet in the 2030s, and it is using a mix of robotic missions, lunar operations, and technology development to prepare for that step.
China’s methodical Mars ladder
China’s path to Mars is built on a ladder of increasingly complex robotic missions, each one designed to prove a new capability. The Tianwen-1 mission, which placed an orbiter and the Jurong rover on the surface, demonstrated that China could navigate interplanetary space, enter Martian orbit, and land a medium-sized rover that many analysts have described as essentially a copy of NASA’s older designs. In video coverage of what China found on Mars, Jurong is presented as a medium-sized platform that has already given Chinese engineers practical experience with surface operations, communications, and environmental hazards on Mars.
The next rung is Tianwen-3, a Mars sample return mission that CNSA plans to execute with two launches in 2028, using one spacecraft to land, collect samples, and launch them back into orbit, and another to retrieve the sample container and bring it home. Detailed reporting on how China and SpaceX envision reaching Mars notes that the China National Space Administration intends Tianwen-3 to return material that can be studied for signs of life, a scientific prize that NASA has long sought. In parallel, Chinese planners have spoken about a longer term goal of sending a crew to orbit Mars by 2050, with analysis of the real space race pointing out that Western observers are now taking China’s stated commitment to a crewed Martian orbit mission more seriously as state-owned enterprises and China National Space Administration leaders repeat those targets.
SpaceX’s Starship gamble
SpaceX is betting that scale and reusability will let it sprint ahead of both national programs on human missions, even if it has no interest in a traditional “flags and footprints” moment. The company’s Mars campaign page lays out a plan to send the first Starships to Mars in 2026, uncrewed, to gather critical data on the planet’s atmosphere, surface conditions, and the performance of the vehicles during entry, descent, and landing, as well as to begin cargo deliveries to the Martian surface. Those early flights are meant to validate the idea that a single fully reusable system can handle both Earth orbit launches and interplanetary transfers, a concept that, if it works, would radically lower the cost of each Mars mission.
Behind that near-term plan sits a broader colonization concept that has been sketched out over the past decade. Documentation on the SpaceX Mars colonization program notes that Musk has stated that Starship’s earliest possible Mars landing could have been 2022, and that a crewed mission to Mars would take place later, funded by public–private partnerships that blend government contracts with private capital. A separate analysis of the construction of the spaceport that will take humans to Mars describes SpaceX’s vision for colonization after 2025, portraying an aggressive timeline in which uncrewed missions in the second half of the 2020s pave the way for human flights once Starship is flying regularly and reconnaissance of resources such as water ice has progressed.
NASA’s slower, broader campaign
NASA is moving toward Mars on a slower but more diversified track, using a mix of robotic missions, lunar operations, and technology development that is not solely focused on beating anyone to a specific date. A historical overview of exploration notes that NASA is on a journey to Mars, with a goal of sending humans to the Red Planet in the 2030s, and that this builds on decades of Martian experience that began when NASA landed its first Martian rover mission, Pathfinder, on July 4, 1997. Since Pathfinder, the United States has launched a series of increasingly capable orbiters, landers, and rovers, including missions that combined an orbiter, lander, and rover in a single campaign, creating a deep reservoir of operational knowledge about Mars.
At the same time, NASA is developing the capabilities needed to send humans to an asteroid by 2025 and Mars in the 2030s, with agency planning documents describing how Future Mars exploration concepts are tied to new propulsion, life support, and radiation protection technologies. The agency’s current robotic work on Mars is also part of this preparation, with the Perseverance rover collecting samples and testing systems that could support later human missions; NASA will soon find out if the Perseverance rover can really persevere on Mars as it continues to operate in harsh conditions, a test that will inform how NASA designs long-lived surface infrastructure.
Launch muscle and industrial capacity
Any realistic assessment of who reaches Mars first has to start with launch capacity, and here SpaceX has a clear near-term advantage. As of 2025, SpaceX is described as the world’s dominant space launch provider, with a launch cadence that eclipses all others, including private competitors and national agencies, and a business model that blends commercial satellite work with governmental contracts. That industrial base gives SpaceX a unique ability to iterate quickly on Starship, absorb failures, and still maintain revenue from its Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy operations, a flexibility that neither NASA nor CNSA enjoys in the same way.
China is building up its own heavy-lift capability, but it is still in the design and early development phase for the rockets that would be needed for large-scale Mars missions. Discussion among space enthusiasts about whether NASA or CNSA is best positioned to return humans to the Moon points out that China has not even finalized the Long March 9 design and that this vehicle is not expected to fly for another decade, a timeline that pushes truly large-scale crewed Mars hardware into the 2030s or beyond. NASA, for its part, is relying on the Space Launch System for some deep-space missions while increasingly turning to commercial providers for cargo and crew, which means its Mars schedule is tightly coupled to how quickly companies like SpaceX can mature their vehicles.
Sample return: the first real finish line
The first concrete race on Mars is not about people at all, it is about rocks. NASA and its partners have been working on a Mars Sample Return architecture that would bring back the cores Perseverance is caching, but that plan has run into cost and schedule problems, prompting concern that the United States could lose the initiative. A detailed analysis of why the United States should prioritize Mars notes that NASA landed Pathfinder in 1997 and has since built a record of Martian exploration that includes orbiters, landers, and rovers, but it also argues that the next strategic step is to secure a sample return that can answer fundamental questions about life and planetary evolution.
China has sensed an opening here. Commentary on the state of the Mars race notes that with NASA’s plan faltering, China knows it can be first with Mars sample return, especially if Tianwen-3 stays on track for a launch in 2028 and a return by the end of the decade. Broader coverage of space missions to watch in the coming years points out that China has already proven its ability to execute complex sample return missions in cislunar space and is now planning to bring back material from Mars by the end of this decade, a schedule that would likely beat any restructured NASA sample return architecture unless the United States moves very quickly.
Timelines for human footprints
When it comes to human landings, the timelines are fuzzier and more contested, and public debate reflects that uncertainty. In one widely discussed thread, space enthusiasts debate when the first human will set foot on Mars, with some arguing that if the methan production works as they want, crews could have fuel to return to Earth by that point, while others caution that life support, radiation, and political risk will slow any schedule. That conversation captures the gap between optimistic engineering scenarios and the realities of funding and safety certification that any crewed mission must navigate.
Strategic analysis of whether the United States can win the Mars space race underscores that, but the United States still has a chance to lead if it can align its political, technical, and budgetary decisions around a clear Mars objective. A separate assessment of the broader Mars competition notes that in the case of assessing China’s commitment to a crewed lunar landing, Western space watchers initially had less confidence in state-owned enterprises and China National Space Administration leaders’ statements, but that view has shifted as China has met more of its intermediate milestones. Taken together, these perspectives suggest that while SpaceX may attempt an early crewed mission if Starship matures quickly, NASA and CNSA are more likely to wait for a higher level of demonstrated reliability, which could push their first human landings into the 2030s or 2040s.
Public opinion and soft power stakes
The Mars race is not only about hardware, it is also about national prestige and the narratives that citizens and leaders build around spaceflight. Online discussions about whether China would be able to colonise Mars first often frame the issue in terms of political will and funding, with some commenters arguing that population peak is far less of an issue in China than in the West and that the key is sustained funding and a clear long-term plan. That kind of debate reflects a growing recognition that Mars has become a proxy for broader questions about technological leadership and the future of human civilization beyond Earth.
At the same time, policy-focused analysis asks why the United States should prioritize Mars, arguing that NASA’s record of Martian exploration has already delivered major scientific returns and that a human mission would reinforce the United States role as the leading space power. A separate deep dive into whether NASA can win the Mars space race lays out how the United States still has a chance to win if it can stabilize its Mars architecture, avoid repeated redesigns, and leverage commercial partners effectively. For China, a successful Mars sample return and a later crewed orbital mission would signal that its state-owned enterprises and central planning model can match or surpass Western capabilities, while for SpaceX, a successful human landing would validate the idea that a private company can lead humanity’s expansion to another planet.
So who is really ahead?
When I weigh the evidence, I see three different leaders in three different lanes. On robotic science and sample return, China has positioned itself to strike first, with Tianwen-3 targeting a 2028 launch and a sample return by the end of the decade that could beat any restructured NASA plan. On heavy-lift launch capacity and iterative development, SpaceX is ahead, with its status as the world’s dominant launch provider giving it the industrial base to push Starship toward the kind of flight rate that a Mars campaign will require, and with its own Mars materials describing uncrewed Starships heading for Mars in 2026 as a concrete near-term objective.
On long-term human exploration architectures, NASA still has the deepest experience and the broadest portfolio, from Pathfinder and later rovers to current work on Future Mars capabilities and the Perseverance rover’s ongoing operations on Mars, but it is also the most constrained by political cycles and budget oversight. A concise history of exploration notes that NASA is on a journey to Mars with a goal of sending humans there in the 2030s, while a separate NASA overview emphasizes that the agency is developing the capabilities needed to send humans to an asteroid by 2025 and Mars in the 2030s as part of a wider effort to answer fundamental mysteries of the cosmos. In practical terms, that means the first human to reach Mars could well ride a privately built Starship operating under a mix of commercial and governmental oversight, even as China and NASA compete more directly on scientific milestones and long-term presence.
The emerging shape of a multi-front Mars race
Looking ahead, I expect the Mars race to fragment into overlapping milestones rather than a single decisive victory. SpaceX’s vision for colonization after 2025, described in analyses of the spaceport that will take humans to Mars, imagines a steady drumbeat of uncrewed missions that build up infrastructure and reconnaissance of resources such as water ice, followed by crewed flights once the transport system is proven. China’s trajectory, built around Tianwen-3 and a later crewed orbital mission by 2050, is more conservative but also more tightly integrated into national planning, while NASA’s approach threads Mars preparation through lunar operations, technology development, and robotic science that will continue regardless of the exact date of a first landing.
In that sense, the question of who reaches Mars first may end up with different answers depending on what counts as “arrival.” If the metric is the first samples returned, China has a credible path to win. If it is the first human landing attempt, SpaceX’s aggressive Starship schedule gives it a plausible, if risky, shot at beating both national agencies. If the measure is sustained scientific and exploratory presence, NASA’s decades of Martian work and its ongoing development of Future Mars capabilities position the United States to remain central even if it is not first to every milestone. What is clear is that the next two decades will see Mars move from a distant dream to a place where multiple flags, and perhaps multiple corporate logos, share the same red horizon.
More from MorningOverview