Axolotls, the permanently aquatic salamanders native to Mexico, can regrow limbs, spinal cords, and even parts of their hearts. But recent research has revealed something that caught scientists off guard: these animals can regenerate a damaged lung after partial tissue removal, a complex internal organ, through a biological mechanism distinct from anything observed in limb regrowth. Paired with separate findings about how the axolotl brain orchestrates regeneration from a distance, these discoveries are reshaping what biologists thought possible in vertebrate tissue repair.
How a Salamander Regrows Lung Tissue
Most regeneration research in axolotls has focused on external structures like limbs and tails, where a mass of undifferentiated cells called a blastema forms at the wound site and gradually rebuilds the missing tissue. Lung regeneration, however, follows a fundamentally different playbook. After surgical removal of lung tissue, axolotls mount what researchers describe as an organ-wide proliferative response that does not rely on a localized blastema. Instead, cells throughout the remaining lung begin dividing, coordinating a distributed rebuilding effort that restores both the mass and the shape of the organ. The distinction matters because it suggests axolotls possess more than one regenerative strategy, deploying different molecular toolkits depending on the type of tissue that needs repair.
The timeline for this recovery is remarkably fast by mammalian standards. Researchers documented that lung mass and morphology returned to baseline within approximately 56 days after amputation, according to findings published by the American Association for Anatomy. That is roughly two months for a vertebrate to restore a functioning respiratory organ after partial removal of lung tissue. For context, human lungs do not regenerate after significant injury. Instead, damaged tissue is replaced by scar tissue, a process called fibrosis that permanently reduces breathing capacity. The axolotl’s ability to sidestep scarring entirely and restore organ architecture raises a pointed question: what molecular signals are telling those cells to rebuild rather than scar over, and could any of those signals be safely co-opted in a mammalian lung?
The Brain’s Long-Distance Role in Regeneration
A separate line of research has identified an unexpected player in axolotl regeneration: the brain itself. When an axolotl loses part of its tail, a specific population of neurons in the brain activates in response to the distant injury. This is not a passive stress response. The activated neurons appear to send downstream signals that directly influence how well the tail regrows. When researchers blocked a signaling pathway called ERK in the brain, the length of regenerated tail tissue decreased measurably. A second pathway involving a molecule called neurotensin also proved important. Inhibiting neurotensin signaling in the brain similarly disrupted the regenerative process, affecting inflammatory responses at the wound site and altering the pattern of new tissue formation.
This finding reframes regeneration as something more than a local wound-healing event. It implies the brain acts as a kind of control center, detecting injury and dispatching chemical instructions that shape the quality and extent of tissue regrowth. The practical implication is significant: if the brain coordinates tail regeneration through ERK and neurotensin pathways, similar long-range signaling could theoretically influence how internal organs like the lung rebuild themselves. No study has yet tested whether inhibiting ERK in the brain of a lung-injured axolotl would reduce the organ-wide proliferative response observed in lung tissue. But the parallel is hard to ignore, and it opens a testable hypothesis that could connect two seemingly separate branches of regeneration biology: organ-specific cell proliferation and central nervous system control.
Why Mammals Cannot Do the Same
The obvious follow-up question is why humans and other mammals lack these abilities. Mammalian wound healing appears to have evolved to prioritize speed and infection prevention over structural restoration. When you cut your skin, your body rushes to close the wound with collagen-rich scar tissue. This is fast and effective at preventing blood loss and bacterial invasion, but it comes at the cost of restoring the original tissue architecture. Axolotls, by contrast, appear to tolerate a slower, more deliberate repair process that preserves cellular identity and organ structure, allowing tissues to return to something close to their pre-injury state rather than sealing over with permanent scars.
There is also a deeper genetic and immunological puzzle. Humans actually share many of the same signaling pathways that axolotls use during regeneration, including ERK and related growth-factor cascades. The difference may lie not in whether we have the right genes, but in how and when those genes are activated after injury. Mammalian immune responses tend to trigger aggressive inflammation that promotes scarring, while axolotl immune systems seem to modulate inflammation in ways that support tissue rebuilding. The brain-mediated signaling discovered in tail regeneration studies adds another layer: it is possible that mammals lack not just the right local wound signals but also the right long-range neural instructions to coordinate organ-scale repair. Understanding why those instructions are muted or absent in mammals could be as important as cataloging the pro-regenerative signals in axolotls.
What This Could Mean for Human Medicine
The gap between understanding axolotl regeneration and applying it to human patients is enormous, and any medical implications will take years of work to clarify. These are animals that diverged from the mammalian lineage hundreds of millions of years ago, and their physiology differs from ours in ways that researchers are still cataloging. That said, the lung regeneration findings carry a specific kind of relevance for medicine. Chronic lung diseases like pulmonary fibrosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease destroy functional lung tissue and replace it with scar tissue, progressively suffocating patients. Current treatments slow the damage but cannot reverse it. If scientists can identify the exact molecular signals that tell axolotl lung cells to proliferate and rebuild rather than scar, those signals could become targets for drugs designed to tip human lung repair away from fibrosis and toward regeneration.
The brain-signaling dimension adds a second avenue worth watching. If distant neural signals genuinely shape the quality of organ regeneration, then future therapies might need to address not just the wound site but also the brain’s response to injury. That could mean, for example, stimulating specific neural circuits or modulating neuropeptides like neurotensin to create a body-wide environment more favorable to repair. This is a fundamentally different way of thinking about tissue healing, one that treats regeneration as a whole-body event rather than a purely local cellular process. Early-stage work in other vertebrates has already suggested that nerve inputs influence wound outcomes, but the axolotl’s lung recovery, completed in roughly 56 days with restoration of organ shape and function after partial tissue removal, represents one of the clearest demonstrations that a vertebrate body can rebuild a vital internal organ without transplantation or prosthetics.
Challenging the Limits of Regeneration Science
Taken together, the lung and brain studies challenge long-standing assumptions about the limits of regeneration in vertebrates. The discovery that axolotls can regrow lung tissue through a diffuse wave of cell division, rather than a localized blastema, expands the known repertoire of regenerative strategies. At the same time, evidence that the brain can remotely influence tail regrowth suggests that regeneration is orchestrated across multiple organ systems, not just within the injured tissue. These insights push regeneration biology beyond simple comparisons of “what humans can’t do” and toward a more nuanced map of how different tissues, signals, and organs cooperate to rebuild complex structures.
For now, axolotls remain exceptional rather than a blueprint we can directly copy. Yet their abilities provide a living proof of principle that vertebrate bodies are capable of far more extensive repair than humans currently achieve. By dissecting how organ-wide proliferative responses are triggered in the lung, how neural pathways like ERK and neurotensin shape distant tissues, and why mammals default to scarring instead of regeneration, researchers are gradually turning extraordinary salamander biology into concrete hypotheses for medicine. Whether those hypotheses ultimately yield therapies that help damaged human lungs or other organs recover more fully, the axolotl has already accomplished something remarkable: it has forced scientists to reconsider where the true limits of regeneration might lie.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
