For decades, autism has been framed as a condition that overwhelmingly affects boys, with girls treated as statistical outliers and, too often, diagnostic afterthoughts. A massive population study now suggests that picture is badly skewed, indicating that the true incidence of autism in boys and girls may be far closer than the familiar ratios imply. If that holds, the story of autism is not that girls are spared, but that they have been systematically overlooked.
The new research tracks autism diagnoses across childhood and into adulthood, revealing that the apparent male bias shrinks sharply with age as more women are finally identified. Rather than a biological mystery in which girls are somehow protected, the findings point toward a diagnostic system that has long been calibrated to notice boys first and girls, if at all, much later.
What the huge new dataset actually shows
The fresh evidence comes from a nationwide analysis of autism spectrum disorder, or ASD, that followed more than 2,756,779 people over 35 years and mapped who received a diagnosis and when. In this cohort, the incidence rate for ASD climbed with each five year age interval throughout childhood, peaking at 645.5 per 100, 000 person years, a level that underlines how common neurodevelopmental differences have become in routine clinical practice. The study’s population data show that boys are still more likely to be diagnosed in early childhood, but that gap steadily narrows as the cohort ages.
By adulthood, the researchers report that the male to female incidence of ASD can no longer be clearly distinguished, suggesting that many autistic girls are simply identified later in life. The incidence curves flatten between the sexes as people move through their teens and into their twenties, which is exactly when many women report finally receiving an explanation for lifelong social and sensory differences. In other words, the biology may be closer to parity, while the diagnostic clock is heavily gendered.
A long‑held assumption under strain
Historically, autism has been considered a condition predominantly diagnosed in males, with a reported male to female diagnosis ratio of roughly four to one. That rule of thumb is so entrenched that it still appears in reference texts and clinical training, even as newer work chips away at it. As one overview of the new findings notes, the latest analysis directly challenges that old assumption by showing that women and men are almost equally likely to carry an autism diagnosis by early adulthood, a pattern highlighted in a recent analysis of the study.
Earlier this year, a detailed report on the same dataset underscored how the gender gap in diagnoses is widest in early childhood and then steadily contracts. In the youngest age bands, boys were several times more likely than girls to be identified as autistic, but by the time participants reached their late teens and twenties, the ratio had moved much closer to one to one, a trajectory described in depth in a follow up piece. That pattern is hard to square with a simple story of innate male vulnerability and instead points toward a system that is catching girls late.
Girls are missed in childhood, then “catch up”
The new numbers are starkest when you look at who gets help first. Overall, boys were three to four times more likely than girls to be diagnosed with autism under the age of 10, a disparity that reflects both clinical expectations and the way autistic traits tend to present in boys. That early gap is documented in detail in an analysis of childhood diagnoses that found boys outnumbered girls severalfold in primary school years, as reported in a breakdown of Overall childhood ratios.
By age 20, however, diagnosis rates for men and women almost equalize, suggesting that many autistic girls are only being recognized in adolescence or early adulthood. One report notes that among young adults, the cumulative diagnosis rate for women was close to that of men, even though the path to that point had been far more delayed and circuitous, a pattern captured in coverage that highlighted how the gap narrows sharply by age 20. That late recognition has real consequences, from missed support in school to years of misdiagnosed anxiety or depression.
Incidence may be similar, but timing is not
When researchers step back from diagnosis timing and look at how often autism actually occurs, the picture shifts again. A synthesis of the new evidence concludes that the incidence of autism is similar in boys and girls, although boys are diagnosed earlier, a key point emphasized by commentator Jorge Aguado, who has argued that the data support a near equal underlying rate of autistic traits. His view, grounded in the same national registry, is laid out in a discussion of how incidence converges even as diagnostic age diverges.
That distinction between how often autism exists and when it is labeled is crucial. The registry study’s Abstract, under the heading Objectives To examine changes in the male to female ratio in diagnoses of ASD over a 35 year period, explicitly set out to separate biological prevalence from diagnostic behavior, a goal spelled out in the Objectives To section of the paper. Commentators like Jorge Aguado have seized on that design to argue that what looks like a male heavy condition in childhood may, in reality, be a reflection of who the system is primed to see first, a point he reiterates in a separate note on how boys are diagnosed.
Why the apparent gap is closing
Part of the explanation lies in how autism itself is defined. Over recent decades, diagnostic criteria have broadened and awareness has grown, especially among parents and teachers, which has driven a steady rise in recorded prevalence. One summary of the new work notes that the increase in autism diagnoses is thought to be linked to wider diagnostic criteria and societal changes, for example more proactive parent advocacy and better screening in schools, trends described in an overview of how prevalence has risen. As those criteria and expectations shift, more girls whose traits were previously dismissed as shyness or perfectionism are being recognized as autistic.
At the same time, the broader field of Sex and gender differences in autism has been grappling with the fact that Men and boys are more frequently diagnosed, even though research on true prevalence has so far produced contradictory results. That tension is captured in a reference entry on Sex and gender, which notes that diagnostic bias and camouflaging by girls may both be at play. The new registry data, by showing incidence converging over time, add weight to the idea that the gap is closing not because boys are becoming less autistic, but because the system is finally starting to find the girls who were there all along.
More from Morning Overview
