A strange, ultra-bright flash in a distant galaxy has given astronomers their strongest hint yet that a new class of stellar catastrophe exists. The event, tagged ZTF25abjmnps and also known as AT2025ulz, may be the first observed example of a “superkilonova,” a blast that appears to outmuscle even the violent mergers of neutron stars that typically power kilonovae. If that interpretation holds, it could reshape how I think about the most extreme collisions in the universe and the origins of some of its heaviest elements.
Instead of a single, clean signal, researchers are piecing together this candidate from a mosaic of clues: an unusual optical flare, a subtle gravitational-wave whisper, and theoretical models that predict what happens when compact objects collide under especially exotic conditions. The stakes are high, because confirming a superkilonova would open a new window on how black holes form, how matter behaves at nuclear densities, and how the cosmos forges the gold, platinum, and other heavy elements that end up in everything from jewelry to smartphone components.
What astronomers mean by a “superkilonova”
When astronomers talk about a kilonova, they usually mean the explosive finale of two neutron stars spiraling together and merging into a single, even denser remnant. In one widely discussed observation, Scientists described a nearly spherical “cosmic fireball” that fit this picture, with the merger of two neutron stars driving a bright, short-lived glow. A superkilonova, by contrast, is a proposed step up in both energy and complexity, where the same basic ingredients may be involved but the outcome is far more luminous and perhaps shaped by more extreme physics, such as unusually massive compact objects or exotic accretion flows.
In practice, I use the term “superkilonova” as a working label for events that look too bright, too fast, or too blue to be explained by standard neutron star mergers alone, yet still show signs of the radioactive debris and relativistic ejecta that define kilonovae. The candidate linked to ZTF25abjmnps sits in this gray zone, where its light curve and color evolution seem to demand more energy than a typical merger can supply, pushing theorists to consider additional power sources like fallback accretion onto a newborn black hole or magnetar-level magnetic fields that pump extra energy into the ejecta.
The curious case of ZTF25abjmnps (AT2025ulz)
The event at the center of the current debate carries the somewhat unwieldy designation ZTF25abjmnps, also cataloged as AT2025ulz, and it first appeared as a fast, bright optical transient in data from a wide-field survey. What makes it stand out is not just its brightness but the way it brightened and faded, with a rapid rise and decline that do not match the slow evolution of typical supernovae. In a detailed analysis, researchers framed ZTF25abjmnps (AT2025ulz) as part of a broader study titled “ZTF25abjmnps (AT2025ulz) and S250818k: A Candidate Superkilonova from a Subthreshold Subsolar Gravitational-wave Trigger,” explicitly presenting it as a Candidate Superkilonova.
Crucially, the same work links the optical flare to a “Subthreshold Subsolar Gravitational” signal, labeled S250818k, which did not rise above the usual detection threshold for gravitational-wave alerts but still hints at a compact-object merger. By tying ZTF25abjmnps to this subtle “Trigger,” the authors argue that the transient may represent a merger involving unusually low-mass compact objects, possibly below a solar mass, that nonetheless produced an outsized electromagnetic display. That combination of a faint gravitational-wave whisper and a loud optical shout is exactly the kind of mismatch that motivates the superkilonova label, suggesting that something in the merger physics amplified the light far beyond expectations.
How this blast compares with ordinary kilonovae
To understand why ZTF25abjmnps looks so strange, I find it useful to compare it with the textbook picture of a kilonova. In the spherical “perfect explosion” described by Scientists, two neutron stars merge, fling out neutron-rich debris, and power a glow that peaks over days as freshly synthesized heavy elements decay. The light is typically redder and less luminous than a classic supernova, because the ejecta are dense and rich in lanthanides that trap radiation. ZTF25abjmnps, by contrast, appears bluer and more luminous, with a faster evolution that suggests a different mix of ejecta mass, composition, and energy injection.
One way to frame the difference is to think in terms of energy budgets and timescales. A standard kilonova is powered primarily by radioactive decay of r-process elements, while a superkilonova candidate like ZTF25abjmnps may require an additional engine, such as a long-lived hypermassive neutron star or a rapidly accreting black hole that pumps extra energy into the outflow. The link to a “Subthreshold Subsolar Gravitational” signal hints that the merging objects might have been lighter than usual, which complicates the picture further, since lower masses would normally mean less ejecta and a dimmer event. Reconciling a subsolar merger with a bright, fast transient is exactly the kind of tension that pushes theorists to propose a new category rather than stretching the definition of a kilonova beyond recognition.
Clues from other fast, blue cosmic flashes
ZTF25abjmnps is not the only puzzling transient on the books, and I see important parallels with a broader class known as Luminous Fast Blue Optical Transients, or LFBOTs. These events are characterized by rapid evolution, high luminosity, and blue colors, and they have sparked intense debate about their origins. In the Luminous Fast Blue Optical Transients study, the authors note in their “Conclusions” that the rate of core-collapse events producing black holes more massive than ∼ 30–40 M ⊙ is similar to the observed LFBO T rate, suggesting that very massive star collapses could explain at least some of these flashes.
That same work emphasizes that the “Conclusions” point toward a scenario where the most massive stars, rather than compact-object mergers, drive many LFBOTs, which would distinguish them from kilonovae and superkilonova candidates. However, the phenomenology overlaps: both LFBOTs and ZTF25abjmnps are fast, bright, and blue, and both may involve newly formed black holes accreting matter at extreme rates. The challenge is to disentangle which events are powered by massive star core-collapse and which are tied to mergers, a task that requires combining optical light curves, host galaxy properties, and, when available, gravitational-wave data like the S250818k “Trigger” associated with ZTF25abjmnps.
What massive star collapses can teach us
The idea that very massive stars can produce LFBOT-like explosions is not just a speculative aside, it is central to how I interpret the broader landscape of fast transients. In a related analysis of Luminous Fast Blue Optical Transients, the authors state in their “Oct” “Conclusions” that (very) massive star core-collapse, based on specific criteria, is a plausible explanation for these events and may contribute to r-process enrichment of galaxies. That means some of the heavy elements we see around us could come not only from neutron star mergers but also from the deaths of the most massive stars, which collapse directly into black holes while ejecting neutron-rich material.
For the superkilonova debate, this matters because it broadens the menu of possible engines. If a very massive star can collapse into a black hole and still launch a fast, blue transient, then a merger that promptly forms a black hole might produce something similar, blurring the line between core-collapse and compact-object collisions. The “Conclusions” about r-process enrichment of galaxies suggest that both channels may contribute to the cosmic inventory of heavy elements, and a candidate like ZTF25abjmnps could sit at the intersection, with merger-like gravitational waves and LFBOT-like optical behavior. Sorting out which mechanism dominates in any given event will require more detailed modeling and, ideally, more examples that bridge the gap between these categories.
Black hole accretion disks as element factories
One of the most intriguing threads running through the superkilonova discussion is the role of accretion disks around black holes. When compact objects merge or massive stars collapse, they can form dense, hot disks of matter spiraling into a newborn black hole, and these disks are fertile ground for exotic nuclear reactions. In a detailed study of Accretion Regimes of Neutrino-Cooled Flows onto Black Holes, researchers report that outflows from such disks are promising sites of r-process nucleosynthesis up to M ∙ ∼ < 3000 M ⊙, with additional contributions via the ν p-process. That result underscores how efficiently these extreme environments can forge heavy nuclei, even when the central black hole is far more massive than the stellar-mass objects involved in typical kilonovae.
For a candidate superkilonova like ZTF25abjmnps, I see this as a key piece of the puzzle. If the merger associated with the “Subthreshold Subsolar Gravitational” S250818k signal produced a black hole surrounded by a neutrino-cooled disk, then the outflows from that disk could both power the bright optical transient and synthesize heavy elements. The fact that r-process nucleosynthesis remains viable up to M ∙ ∼ < 3000 M ⊙ suggests that even relatively massive black holes can participate in this process, so a merger that forms a black hole on the higher end of the stellar-mass range could still generate a luminous, element-rich explosion. In that sense, a superkilonova might be the observational signature of a particularly efficient accretion disk, one that converts gravitational energy into both light and new atomic nuclei.
Why the earliest supernovae matter for this story
Although supernovae and kilonovae arise from different progenitors, I find that studies of the earliest stellar explosions help frame the broader context for a candidate superkilonova. Observations with the James Webb Space Telescope have pushed the frontier of supernova research deep into cosmic history, revealing how the first generations of stars lived and died. In one landmark result, NASA reported that its James Webb Space Telescope, in a release titled “Webb Identifies Earliest Supernova to Date, Shows Host Galaxy,” has observed a supernova that exploded when the universe was very young, providing a rare glimpse of its faint host galaxy.
Those early explosions set the stage for everything that follows, enriching the interstellar medium with the first heavy elements and influencing how later generations of stars and compact objects form. If superkilonovae turn out to be real and relatively common, they could represent a later chapter in the same story, where neutron star mergers and black hole accretion disks take over from core-collapse supernovae as the dominant factories for the heaviest elements. The fact that the James Webb Space Telescope can already pick out the “Earliest Supernova” and its host galaxy suggests that, in time, similar instruments might be able to detect kilonova-like events at high redshift, allowing astronomers to trace how the balance between supernovae, kilonovae, and superkilonovae shifts over cosmic time.
Public fascination and the long memory of the cosmos
While the technical debate over ZTF25abjmnps unfolds in specialist journals and conference talks, the idea of a first-ever superkilonova has already seeped into public conversation. On forums where space enthusiasts gather, one widely shared post framed the event as a “Strange Cosmic Blast” that may be the first of its kind, and the same thread highlighted other dramatic episodes in the solar neighborhood, including a claim that The Sun Survived a “Close Call With” “Massive Stars” about 4.4 M “Million Years Ago.” That juxtaposition of a cutting-edge transient and an ancient near miss underscores how the universe’s most violent events can feel both remote and intimately connected to our own history.
I see that fascination as more than just curiosity, it reflects an intuitive sense that these explosions, whether labeled kilonovae, supernovae, or superkilonovae, are part of the same grand narrative that produced the elements in our bodies and the planets we inhabit. When people latch onto phrases like “Strange Cosmic Blast” or “Close Call With” “Massive Stars,” they are, in effect, asking how often the universe rolls the dice on such extreme events and what the consequences might be for life. A candidate superkilonova like ZTF25abjmnps may be far away and harmless to Earth, but by studying it, astronomers are probing the same physical processes that shaped the solar system’s past and will influence its far future.
What comes next for the superkilonova idea
For now, ZTF25abjmnps remains a candidate, not a confirmed member of a new class, and I expect that status to persist until more events with similar properties are found. The combination of a “Subthreshold Subsolar Gravitational” S250818k “Trigger” and a bright, fast optical transient is compelling, but it is also messy, since subthreshold gravitational-wave signals are inherently uncertain and can be contaminated by noise. To firm up the case, astronomers will need future detections where the gravitational-wave data are unambiguous and the electromagnetic counterpart clearly shows the hallmarks of a superkilonova, such as extreme luminosity, rapid evolution, and spectral signatures of heavy-element-rich ejecta.
In parallel, theorists will continue refining models of mergers, accretion disks, and massive star collapses, building on work like the “Conclusions” about black holes more massive than ∼ 30–40 M ⊙ in the Luminous Fast Blue Optical Transients study and the detailed treatment of neutrino-cooled flows up to M ∙ ∼ < 3000 M ⊙ in the Accretion Regimes analysis. As those models mature, they will offer clearer predictions for what a true superkilonova should look like, making it easier to distinguish candidates from lookalikes such as LFBOTs or unusually bright kilonovae. Whether or not ZTF25abjmnps ultimately earns the title, the effort to understand it is already sharpening our picture of how the universe’s most extreme explosions work and how they seed galaxies with the raw materials for planets, technology, and life itself.
More from MorningOverview