When astronomers first picked up a perfectly regular radio heartbeat from deep space in 1967, some of them half-jokingly labeled it a message from “little green men.” That signal, from a spinning stellar corpse, is now at the center of a new debate about whether advanced civilizations might talk in flashes of light that resemble fireflies in the night. I want to trace how that early pulsar clue has evolved into a serious proposal that aliens could be blinking at us in plain sight, using patterns that echo the insects in our backyards.
The pulsar that sounded like “little green men”
The story begins with a young researcher who noticed something that should not have been there. Astronomer Astronomer Jocelyn Bell, then a graduate student, detected a strange, repeating signal from outer space that was so precise her team briefly labeled it “LGM” for little green men. The object was later cataloged as PSR B1919+21, a rapidly spinning neutron star whose radio pulses arrive every 1.3373 seconds, with each burst lasting only 0.04 seconds. That kind of regularity, coming from a point in the sky, felt eerily like a beacon.
Only later did astronomers realize they were seeing a new class of object. On On November 28, 1967, the first pulsar was formally recognized, and within a few months the finding was public, a moment remembered as Discovery of Pulsars. Retrospectives by By Tia Ghose describe how that first signal, later tied to Space History Archives, forced scientists to confront how easily a natural phenomenon can masquerade as technology.
From cosmic metronomes to communication templates
Once pulsars were understood as spinning neutron stars, they became more than curiosities. Their clockwork pulses turned into a reference point for what an artificial beacon might look like. Analysts now describe Pulsars as a useful baseline precisely because they look so artificial, with Their regular flashes acting like a cosmic metronome. That history is exactly why a new generation of researchers is comfortable asking whether an advanced civilization might deliberately mimic or tweak such patterns to stand out against the natural background.
Recent work argues that Pulsar Discovery From 1967 still offers a conceptual Clue. Those analyses suggest that Language and radio signals may not matter to aliens in the way humans expect, and that Language and symbolic content could be secondary to the raw structure of a signal. Instead, the argument goes, a civilization might choose simple, repeating bursts that are easy to spot against the noise, using timing and brightness as the real carriers of meaning.
Fireflies as a blueprint for alien signaling
To understand how such a system might work, some scientists have turned to a familiar summer spectacle. Insects that light up at dusk are not just pretty, they are communicating with coded flashes. Researchers studying whether aliens and fireflies communicate similarly point out that each species has its own rhythm, a pattern that lets potential mates recognize one another. Photographs by Garth Battista in a section labeled Community Photos capture how dense and yet decipherable those patterns can be when seen from the right vantage point.
A formal framework for this idea appears in a paper described as Here, which outlines a firefly-inspired model for decoding the alien. The authors argue that SETI can learn from non human species that use flashes optimized for contrast with natural backgrounds. In that view, Extraterrestrial signals may also be identifiable not by their complexity or decodable content, but by the structural properties of their light curves, a point underscored in a companion discussion of Extraterrestrial beacons that would stand out from astronomical phenomena such as pulsars.
Aliens chatting “in plain sight” with light
Building on that biological analogy, a separate group has proposed that advanced civilizations might already be exchanging messages in the open sky. Reports on how Aliens could be chatting with each other in plain sight describe a model where short, bright flashes serve as a kind of interstellar Morse code. In that coverage, writer Vishwam Sankaran notes that such signals would let different species recognize each other without needing to share a language, much as firefly species do with their distinct flash signatures.
The same work explains that Scientists developed a firefly inspired model to explore how intelligent aliens might generate signals that are distinct from their natural environment. According to that description, the team behind the study, summarized again in a separate Scientists focused piece, argues that a civilization could tune its flashes to be easily separated from starlight and other noise, just as fireflies tune their glow to stand out at dusk. A related analysis framed as Advanced suggests that such a system would be simple but robust, and that a new paper posits that advanced alien civilizations could be communicating like fireflies in plain sight without us recognizing the pattern.
Simple flashes, complex implications
What makes this proposal striking is its embrace of simplicity. Analyses of the firefly model emphasize that But while these signals are simple, they do allow distinct firefly species to tell each other apart, and the researchers argue that similar structural cues could let alien societies identify one another even if humans would not. In that sense, the content of the message might be less important than the fact that it is obviously not random, a view echoed in the claim that Interstellar light signals could be designed to stand out from the universe’s many natural sources of flicker.
Researchers behind the firefly inspired framework argue that Extraterrestrial signals may also be identifiable not by their complexity or decodable content, but by the structural properties of their light curves when compared with known astronomical phenomena such as pulsars. That perspective is reinforced by commentary that Instead of chasing ever more elaborate radio messages, SETI projects might benefit from scanning for repeating optical flashes that look out of place. In that context, the original pulsar that once mimicked a beacon becomes a cautionary tale and a calibration tool, a reminder that nature can fake technology, but also a template for what a deliberately engineered pattern might resemble.
More from Morning Overview