Anthropic expanded its Claude AI platform on February 24, 2026, rolling out a wave of enterprise plugins and connectors that reach directly into Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, and a growing list of third-party productivity tools. The launch, announced during an exclusive livestream event, pairs a new “Cowork” feature with admin controls designed to let IT teams govern exactly how the AI interacts with corporate data. For organizations already weighing how deeply to embed AI into daily operations, the release forces a concrete decision: open the gates to an AI assistant that can read, draft, and act inside the apps employees already use, or risk falling behind competitors who do.
Anthropic is positioning this expansion as a shift from experimental pilots to production-grade deployment. Instead of treating Claude as an isolated chat window, the company is encouraging enterprises to wire the model into the systems that hold their files, calendars, source code, and communications. That strategy aligns with a broader industry trend toward “agentic” AI that can take actions, not just generate text. But it also exposes Claude to the messy realities of corporate IT: overlapping identity systems, complex permission hierarchies, and strict compliance requirements that go well beyond consumer-grade privacy promises.
Connectors Bring Claude Into Core Productivity Apps
At the center of the release is a distinction Anthropic draws between “connectors” and “plugins.” Connectors are the data pipelines, built on Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol (MCP), that let Claude securely pull information from and push actions to external services. The first-party connector list now includes Google Drive, Gmail, Google Calendar, Slack, GitHub, and Microsoft 365. Plugins, by contrast, bundle one or more connectors into task-specific packages that teams can install and share. The technical separation matters because it gives administrators a granular layer of control: they can approve a connector to Google Drive without automatically granting Claude permission to send emails through Gmail.
The practical result is that Claude can now sit inside the tools where most knowledge work happens. A marketing team could, for example, ask Claude to pull quarterly metrics from a Google Sheet, cross-reference them with notes in a shared Drive folder, and draft a summary email in Gmail, all without leaving the Claude interface. Engineering teams might have Claude scan GitHub issues, summarize open pull requests, and draft release notes in a shared document. That kind of multi-step workflow has been a selling point for rival AI assistants from Microsoft and Google themselves, but Anthropic is betting that a model-agnostic connector layer, rather than a walled-garden approach, will appeal to organizations running mixed software stacks.
DocuSign, WordPress, and the Plugin Marketplace
Beyond the core Google and Microsoft integrations, Anthropic’s blog post detailing plugins for enterprise teams lists connectors for DocuSign and WordPress among the expanded set. DocuSign integration suggests Claude could eventually handle contract routing and signature workflows, a high-value use case in legal and procurement departments where turnaround time and error reduction carry direct financial impact. WordPress connectivity, meanwhile, opens a path for content teams to manage publishing pipelines with AI assistance, from drafting posts and optimizing metadata to scheduling content across multiple sites or regions from within a single conversational interface.
The more structural addition is the private plugin marketplace. Anthropic is giving enterprise admins the ability to curate which plugins appear for their organization, control provisioning, and auto-install approved packages across teams. That model borrows from how companies already manage browser extensions or Slack apps, applying a familiar IT governance pattern to AI tooling. For security-conscious organizations, the marketplace approach means Claude’s reach can be expanded incrementally rather than all at once, reducing the blast radius if a connector misbehaves or a data-access policy needs to change. It also creates a path for internal developers or systems integrators to build custom plugins tailored to a specific company’s workflows, then distribute them through a controlled catalog rather than ad hoc scripts.
Cowork Reframes Claude as a Persistent Team Member
The “Cowork” feature, announced alongside the plugins, repositions Claude from a chat-based assistant into something closer to a persistent collaborator. Rather than answering one-off questions, Cowork is designed to let Claude participate in ongoing projects, retain context across sessions, and take actions inside connected apps on behalf of a team. Anthropic framed the feature during its enterprise agents livestream as part of a broader push toward AI that operates with sustained awareness of a team’s goals and data. In practice, that could mean a Cowork instance that “owns” a project workspace, tracks deadlines across calendars, and surfaces relevant documents or code changes without being explicitly prompted each time.
That framing carries real implications for how companies think about AI adoption. A one-shot chatbot is easy to sandbox. A persistent agent with read and write access to Google Calendar, GitHub repositories, and Microsoft 365 documents is not. The shift from reactive tool to proactive teammate raises the stakes on access controls, audit trails, and data residency, all areas where Anthropic’s announcement emphasizes admin-level governance but where public documentation does not yet detail specific encryption standards, data retention policies, or third-party audit certifications. Organizations evaluating Cowork will likely need answers to those questions before granting the feature broad access, especially in regulated sectors like finance, healthcare, or government where automated actions can trigger compliance obligations.
The Interoperability Tension Between Google and Microsoft
One underexplored friction in Anthropic’s announcement is what happens when Claude bridges competing ecosystems. Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 are not designed to play well together; they compete for the same enterprise contracts, and their APIs reflect different data models, permission structures, and authentication flows. Claude’s connectors promise to abstract away those differences, but abstraction layers often introduce their own problems. A connector that works flawlessly with Google Drive’s sharing permissions may behave unpredictably when translating those permissions into Microsoft 365’s access model, especially in organizations that run both suites simultaneously and maintain parallel sets of groups, roles, and security policies.
Anthropic’s use of MCP as the underlying protocol is an attempt to standardize that translation layer. If MCP gains traction beyond Claude, it could become a de facto bridge between otherwise siloed productivity platforms, allowing a single AI agent to orchestrate tasks across calendars, email systems, and document stores regardless of vendor. But that outcome depends on whether Google and Microsoft choose to support or resist a third party acting as an intermediary. Both companies have their own AI assistants (Gemini and Copilot, respectively) and little incentive to make it easy for a competitor’s model to operate inside their ecosystems. The risk for Anthropic is that connector reliability becomes hostage to API changes made by platform owners who view Claude as a rival rather than a partner, forcing enterprise customers to absorb any resulting instability.
What Enterprise Teams Should Watch For
The February 24 release is a clear signal that Anthropic sees enterprise integration, not consumer chat, as the primary growth vector for Claude. The combination of connectors, plugins, a curated marketplace, and a persistent Cowork agent addresses the most common complaint from IT leaders evaluating AI tools: that chatbots are impressive in demos but disconnected from the systems where real work gets done. By plugging directly into Gmail, Google Drive, Calendar, Slack, GitHub, Microsoft 365, DocuSign, and WordPress, Claude is trying to close that gap and position itself as an orchestration layer for digital work, not just a text generator sitting on the sidelines.
Still, the announcement leaves several questions open. Anthropic has not published detailed data on beta testing results or early adoption metrics for these plugins, making it difficult for buyers to benchmark reliability at scale. There are no public statements in the available materials specifically addressing how MCP connectors handle data in transit between competing cloud environments, or what safeguards exist if an integration fails mid-workflow. Enterprise teams will want clarity on incident response processes, logging granularity, and the extent to which actions taken by Cowork are reversible or auditable after the fact. Until those details are spelled out, many organizations may choose to start with narrow, low-risk use cases, such as document summarization or internal knowledge search, before letting Claude send contracts for signature or modify production content.
For now, the expanded Claude platform represents both an opportunity and a test. It offers a path to unify fragmented tools under a single conversational interface, but only if Anthropic can deliver the reliability, compliance assurances, and cross-platform diplomacy that such a role demands. Enterprises that move early will help define where the boundaries should sit between human judgment and AI-driven automation inside core productivity suites. Those that wait will be watching closely to see whether Claude’s new connectors, plugins, and Cowork agents can navigate the technical and political fault lines between Google, Microsoft, and the broader ecosystem without becoming another brittle layer in an already complex stack.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
