Hidden beneath the bright dunes of White Sands and the dry flats of the Utah desert, ancient human footprints have been lifted out of the sand and into one of archaeology’s fiercest debates. Pressed into long-vanished wetlands, the tracks suggest people were moving through what are now remote deserts during the last Ice Age. More than curiosities, they are direct, physical traces that help test competing timelines for when humans first reached the Americas and how they survived in harsh environments.
Unlike stone tools or scattered bones, these prints capture moments of motion: children running, adults striding, people crossing muddy ground that no longer exists. As scientists refine the ages of these impressions and map where they cluster, a picture emerges of humans following water and wildlife across a network of Ice Age lakes and marshes that once stretched from New Mexico into Utah and beyond.
White Sands: a hidden Ice Age shoreline
At the heart of this story is White Sands National Park in New Mexico, where a vast gypsum dune field hides one of the world’s densest archives of human tracks. The National Park Service notes that the park holds the largest known collection of fossilized human footprints, preserved in layers of ancient lake mud now exposed between dunes, and that these impressions formed along the edge of a much larger Ice Age lake called Otero, whose shrinking shoreline left broad, muddy flats that recorded every step (NPS overview).
One well-studied cluster at White Sands consists of exactly 61 human footprints preserved in sequence on the shore of this dried-up lake in the Tularosa Basin. Set in saturated sediment that also captured tracks of mammoths and other large Ice Age predators, these 61 prints show that people and megafauna shared the same wet ground at the same time (61-print trackway). The setting matters: these were not random wanderings in open desert, but repeated crossings of a wet margin where humans and animals converged on water.
How old are the White Sands tracks?
Age is where the White Sands story becomes contentious. A widely cited summary explains that the White Sands footprints are about 13,000–16,000 years old, which would place them near or slightly before the classic “Clovis” horizon often used as a baseline for human presence in North America (conservative age range). That range fits a cautious reading of the archaeological record, in which people arrive relatively late and spread quickly after the big ice sheets begin to retreat.
Other researchers argue for a much earlier date. A U.S. Geological Survey release describes two new lines of evidence that support a 21,000 to 23,000-year age estimate for the key White Sands track layers, confirming dates first reported in 2021 and answering earlier criticism about the dating methods (USGS statement). A separate report on work led by Vance Holliday notes that some human footprints at White Sands are up to about 22,400 years old, based on dating of different materials in the same general layers (Holliday study). If these older ages are correct, then humans were in the Southwest during the height of the last glacial maximum, thousands of years earlier than many textbooks once suggested.
Radiocarbon dates and a Facebook summary
Behind the headlines are radiocarbon measurements that scientists use to anchor these footprints in time. A regional news report on recent work at White Sands describes a set of 55 consistent radiocarbon dates from plant material in the footprint layers, a level of agreement that gives researchers more confidence in the dating approach (KOB coverage). These measurements focus on seeds and other organic remains trapped in the same mud as the prints, turning the sediment into a kind of time-stamped record of when people crossed the wet ground.
One widely shared social media post, which is commentary rather than a formal paper, states that researchers used radiocarbon dating of plant seeds found within the footprint layers to argue for an age of about 21,000–23,000 years, and describes prints from children and teenagers moving among mammoths and giant ground sloths on soft clay surfaces (social media recap). Those details match the general scientific picture of White Sands as a place where humans and Ice Age megafauna overlapped, but exact behavior and precise ages remain subjects for peer-reviewed work.
Utah’s desert tracks and vanished wetlands
White Sands is not alone. In the Utah desert, archaeologists have documented Ice Age human footprints on what is now a military testing ground. A Cornell University report describes human trackways on the Utah Test and Training Range, where two visible trails cross what used to be a wetland surface that has not existed for at least 10,000 years, meaning the prints must date to a much earlier climate with shallow water and mud (Cornell summary). The same report notes that the tracks appear and disappear with changing light and moisture, much like the White Sands prints.
Separate coverage of the Utah site explains that archaeologists found human footprints there that are roughly 12,000 years old, and shows Daron Duke of the Far Western Anthropological Research Group speaking with visitors about how changing water levels once allowed people to walk across soft mud that later hardened into durable layers (Utah report). These dates place the Utah tracks later than the oldest proposed ages for White Sands, but still deep in the late Ice Age, when meltwater and shifting rainfall briefly turned parts of the Great Basin and nearby deserts into marshes.
Competing timelines and what they imply
The age debate at White Sands feeds directly into a larger argument over when humans first reached the Americas. A University of Arizona summary states that human footprints at White Sands show activity in the Americas at least 23,000 years ago, and that a later study supports those 2021 findings by confirming that the dates hold up under closer testing (Arizona overview). By contrast, the 13,000–16,000-year estimate linked to one summary of the site would keep the prints within a more traditional range. Both views rely on radiocarbon dating, but they differ in which samples are trusted and how possible contamination is handled.
News coverage reflects this tension. One article describes archaeologists who found 23,000-year-old footprints that could “rewrite” the story of humans in America, quoting researchers who say the evidence pushes back the timeline for human presence by several thousand years (AOL feature). The U.S. Geological Survey release on two new dating approaches is especially important here, because it shows that multiple independent methods converge on the same 21,000 to 23,000-year range. For now, much of the institutional data leans toward an older presence, though some uncertainty will likely remain until more sites with well-dated footprints are found.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
