Ancient shorelines, buried peat and rocks locked beneath Greenland’s ice are all pointing in the same direction: when the climate warms, seas do not just creep higher, they can lurch upward. The latest evidence from past warm periods suggests that future sea levels are likely to rise faster, and perhaps higher, than many current planning assumptions allow. I see a widening gap between what the geological record is telling us and how coastal societies are still building as if the ocean will move on a slow, predictable schedule.
Ancient Greenland rocks rewrite expectations for ice stability
For years, a common hope among researchers and coastal planners was that large parts of the Greenland Ice Sheet would prove stubbornly resistant to melting, even in a warmer world. That hope took a hit when Jan fieldwork at Prudhoe Dome, a small ice cap in northern Greenland, revealed that this supposedly enduring feature had vanished entirely in the recent geological past. Rock samples drilled from beneath the ice show that Prudhoe Dome was ice free during the last interglacial, a time when global temperatures were only modestly higher than today, and that finding suggests Greenland’s ice is more fragile than many models had assumed.
The same story emerges from a broader set of Rock samples collected by Jan Scientists across Greenland, which contain chemical signatures indicating long periods of exposure to open air rather than burial under a frozen expanse. Those clues, drawn from minerals that record how long they have been bombarded by cosmic rays, imply that large sectors of the ice sheet have melted away before and could do so again as the planet warms. When I look at this evidence, especially the way the Scientists’ Rock analysis lines up with the Prudhoe Dome story, it becomes harder to argue that Greenland will deliver only slow, linear sea level rise.
GreenDrill and the surprise of a vanished ice cap
The GreenDrill team went to Prudhoe Dome with a specific hypothesis: that this isolated ice cap had survived intact since the last interglacial, acting as a kind of frozen archive of ancient climate. Instead, Jan drilling revealed that Prudhoe Dome had completely disappeared only about 7,000 years ago, meaning the ice cap is far younger and more dynamic than expected. That result, described in the first GreenDrill study, shows that even relatively modest warming after the last ice age was enough to erase an entire ice cap that had seemed, from the surface, like a permanent fixture of the landscape.
By Tom Dinki reported that the GreenDrill cores contained clear evidence of soil and rock weathering that could only have occurred in the absence of ice, pushing the timing of the last melt event far closer to the present than earlier reconstructions suggested. The project, co-led from BUFFALO, used precise dating techniques to pin down when Prudhoe Dome last disappeared and found that the loss happened more recently than previously known, in a climate not dramatically different from today’s. When I weigh that against current warming trends, the Jan GreenDrill findings read less like an academic curiosity and more like a warning that ice thought to be stable can vanish within the span of human civilizations.
Hidden heat beneath Greenland primes faster melt
Surface air temperatures and ocean currents usually dominate the conversation about melting ice, but the ground beneath Greenland is quietly tilting the odds toward faster loss. Dec work using advanced geophysical techniques has produced the most detailed 3D models yet of temperatures deep beneath the ice sheet, revealing pockets of unexpected warmth. These hot zones, driven by variations in the crust and mantle, mean that some parts of Greenland’s base are already closer to the melting point, so they need less additional warming from the atmosphere or ocean to start sliding and thinning.
Scientists behind this Dec research found that the uneven geothermal heat flow helps explain why some glaciers accelerate more quickly than others, even under similar surface conditions. In my view, this subsurface factor turns Greenland into a patchwork of vulnerabilities, where certain basins could respond disproportionately to the same global temperature rise. By combining the new 3D temperature models with ice dynamics, the Scientists’ Greenland mapping suggests that projections which treat the ice sheet as a uniform block may be underestimating how quickly some sectors can destabilize and feed sea level rise.
What the last ice age reveals about rapid sea level jumps
To understand how seas might behave in the coming centuries, I find it essential to look back at how they responded when the last ice age ended. Mar research on ancient peat buried beneath the North Sea shows that sea level did not rise in a smooth, gentle curve as the great ice sheets retreated. Instead, an analysis of layered peat deposits indicates that water levels surged upward in sharp pulses, with some jumps adding as much as 50 feet in relatively short geological intervals. Those pulses likely came from rapid collapses of ice sheets, a process that could be triggered again if today’s ice crosses critical thresholds.
The same pattern appears in another Mar study of Ancient peat that chronicles how coastlines drowned and re-shaped as the last ice age drew to a close. An analysis of peat from submerged landscapes reveals two distinct episodes when sea level surged rapidly, overwhelming ecosystems and forcing human and animal populations to adapt or retreat. When I compare those abrupt shifts to the incremental numbers often used in modern planning documents, the Ancient peat evidence makes it clear that the climate system is capable of sudden leaps, not just slow climbs, in sea level.
Modern measurements show acceleration, not a steady climb
Ancient records would be easier to dismiss if modern instruments were telling a calmer story, but they are not. According to Global monitoring of oceans and ice, global average sea level has already risen 8 to 9 inches, or 21 to 24 centimeters, since 1880, and the rate of increase has picked up in recent decades. That rise reflects both the expansion of seawater as it warms and the addition of meltwater from glaciers and ice sheets, a combination that tracks closely with the buildup of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. When I look at the long tide gauge records alongside satellite data, the curve is bending upward, not staying flat.
Recent work using 70 tidal gauges and satellite altimetry reinforces that picture, finding that sea level rise is speeding up rather than holding steady. A Dec analysis described as a New study concludes that the acceleration contradicts a more conservative federal report, suggesting that official baselines may already be out of date. Barbara Moran Updated December coverage of this research notes that the observed trend is consistent with expectations from physics and ice loss, even if it outpaces some earlier projections. Taken together, the Global sea level data and the Dec acceleration findings show that the ocean is already responding in a way that echoes the rapid pulses seen at the end of the last ice age, albeit so far on a smaller scale.
Fastest rise in 4,000 years and what that means
Geological records do not just tell us that seas can rise quickly, they also put today’s changes in a deep-time context. Studies of ancient shorelines and sediment cores indicate that current sea level rise is faster than at any time in 4,000 years, a span that covers the entire written history of complex human societies. One Oct assessment of Sea level history concludes that the modern rate stands out sharply against the relatively stable background of the last four millennia, when coastlines shifted but did not race inland the way they are beginning to now. For communities that sit right along the coast, from small Pacific islands to low-lying neighborhoods in Miami and Lagos, that acceleration translates into more frequent flooding and saltwater intrusion even before the most dramatic ice losses arrive.
Another Oct report from TEHRAN, labeled ANA, reaches a similar conclusion, stating that sea levels are rising at their fastest rate in 4,000 years based on a study of geological records. That independent line of evidence, drawn from different coastlines and methods, reinforces the idea that the current trajectory is historically unusual and driven by modern climate forcing rather than natural cycles alone. When I put those findings alongside the peat records of past surges, the 4,000 year benchmark and the Oct TEHRAN ANA study both point to a sobering conclusion: we are already outside the envelope of what coastal civilizations have previously experienced.
Uncertain projections, but a clear direction of travel
Even as the evidence for rising seas piles up, there is still real uncertainty about exactly how much and how fast water levels will climb in the decades ahead. Experts who track GMSL, or global mean sea level, emphasize that future rise depends almost equally on two main contributors, the melting of land ice and the warming of the oceans. Both of those processes are highly sensitive to ongoing climate change, and both can accelerate in response to feedbacks that are difficult to pin down in models. From my perspective, that uncertainty cuts both ways: it means there is a range of possible outcomes, but it also means there is a non-trivial chance of hitting the higher, more dangerous end of that range.
A recent synthesis of physical understanding stresses that while the exact amount and speed are uncertain, future sea-level rise is certain, and the direction of travel is up. The report notes that GMSL rise depends almost equally on ice loss and ocean warming, and that each responds to greenhouse gas emissions on different timescales, locking in some degree of long-term change even if emissions were to fall sharply. When I read that alongside the geological record of abrupt jumps, the GMSL assessment feels less like a comfortingly cautious statement and more like a reminder that we are rolling the dice with a system that has, in the past, produced very rapid changes.
Coastal risk is already rising faster than local plans
While much of the scientific debate plays out in journals and conferences, the consequences are already lapping at the edges of coastal communities. Jan warnings from Scientists about a looming threat to the US coastline highlight that many places are Going to continue to see an acceleration into the future, not just a continuation of past trends. That means more frequent nuisance flooding on sunny days, higher storm surges during hurricanes, and greater erosion of beaches and wetlands that currently buffer inland areas. In my reporting, I have seen local officials still relying on outdated sea level curves that assume a gentle, linear rise, even as the water on their doorsteps tells a different story.
The mismatch between planning and physics is especially stark in fast-growing coastal regions where new housing, highways and industrial facilities are being built in zones that ancient records suggest are inherently unstable. When I connect the dots between the Prudhoe Dome evidence, the North Sea peat pulses and the modern acceleration measured by gauges, the Jan Scientists’ warning reads as a call to update not just climate models, but zoning codes, insurance rules and infrastructure design standards. If ancient evidence is right that seas can rise in sharp bursts, then waiting for perfect certainty before acting is itself a high-risk choice.
Why the deep past should reshape present-day decisions
When I step back from the individual studies and look at the pattern, the message from the deep past is remarkably consistent. Jan clues from Prudhoe Dome show that an ice cap we thought was ancient can vanish in a climate only slightly warmer than today. Mar peat records from the North Sea and other drowned landscapes reveal that sea level has a history of jumping in pulses, not just inching upward. Oct reconstructions of the last 4,000 years demonstrate that the current rate of rise is already exceptional in the context of human civilization. Layered on top of that, modern measurements confirm that the ocean is now rising faster and that the pace is increasing.
For policymakers, engineers and residents of coastal cities, the practical implication is that planning for a slow, predictable ocean is planning for a world that probably will not exist. The combination of ancient and modern evidence suggests that once certain thresholds are crossed in Greenland and other ice reservoirs, the system can deliver decades of unexpectedly rapid sea level rise, even if emissions are eventually curbed. That does not mean catastrophe is inevitable, but it does mean that choices made now about emissions, coastal development and adaptation will determine whether future generations face manageable challenges or the kind of abrupt shoreline shifts that once reshaped the world at the end of the last ice age. In that sense, the Mar North Sea analysis and the Jan Prudhoe Dome clues are not just windows into a vanished world, they are mirrors reflecting the stakes of the choices we face now.
More from Morning Overview