An ancient Egyptian letter, written roughly 3,300 years ago, has suddenly become the latest flashpoint in a very old argument about whether the Bible’s giant humans were rooted in real encounters. The papyrus, long housed quietly in a museum collection, is now being read by some as eyewitness testimony of towering people who sound uncannily like the Nephilim. I see something more complicated and more interesting: a rare window into how Egyptians described foreign enemies, and how modern readers project biblical expectations onto a fragile sheet of inked fiber.
The document in question, often treated as a piece of scribal satire, is now being reexamined by believers, skeptics, and Egyptologists who disagree sharply on what it actually proves. Their clash, playing out in academic circles and on social media, reveals as much about our hunger for confirmation of sacred stories as it does about the ancient world itself.
What the 3,300-year-old papyrus actually is
The text at the center of the debate is known as Papyrus Anastasi I, sometimes shortened to Papyrus Anastasi, a didactic composition that survives today as British Museum 10247. It is often called “The Satirical Letter,” a label that reflects its tone as a mock correspondence used to train scribes in geography, logistics, and polished writing rather than a straightforward military report. The papyrus entered the museum’s collection in 1839 after being purchased from the antiquities dealer Giovanni Anastasi, which is why the document and the modern nickname Anastasi are so closely linked. Egyptologists have long treated it as a sophisticated exercise in rhetoric, not a battlefield dispatch.
Recent coverage, however, has zeroed in on a passage that appears to describe unusually tall enemies encountered in rugged terrain, prompting some commentators to argue that the 3,300-Year-Old Egyptian Document Hints at Biblical Giants. In that reading, the letter’s author is not only drilling a student in precise description but also recording a genuine memory of giant warriors who guarded a narrow mountain pass. The resurfaced interest in this Old Egyptian Document Hints at such figures has been amplified by reports that the scroll, held in London, has been highlighted by a religious organization in Pennsylvania as potential corroboration of biblical accounts of towering people.
How a satirical letter became “proof” of giants
The leap from scribal satire to alleged proof of giants rests on a few vivid lines that describe foreign foes as exceptionally tall and physically imposing. Advocates of a literal reading argue that these details are too specific to be dismissed as metaphor, suggesting that the writer was describing real individuals who stood perhaps seven to eight feet tall, a height that would have been startling in the Late Bronze Age. In this view, the letter’s mockery of an incompetent official navigating hostile territory inadvertently preserves a snapshot of encounters with giant-like people, which some link directly to the Nephilim and other biblical giants.
Reports about a Long-lost Egyptian scroll fueling debate over real-life biblical giants have emphasized claims that these figures could reach up to eight feet in height, a detail that resonates strongly with readers familiar with stories of Goliath. Some coverage has framed the papyrus as newly discovered or newly translated, even though specialists have worked with it for generations. The narrative of a hidden document suddenly emerging to validate scripture is powerful, and it has helped propel Papyrus Anastasi into headlines and social feeds far beyond the usual audience for Late Egyptian literature.
The Nephilim connection and why it matters
The renewed fascination with this 3,300-year-old text is inseparable from the enduring mystery of The Nephilim, the enigmatic “giants” mentioned in the Hebrew Bible. For many readers, any ancient reference to abnormally tall warriors in the Near East becomes a potential puzzle piece in reconstructing who these beings were and whether they correspond to a lost population. When experts note that an Egyptian document appears to describe towering enemies in a mountainous region, it is easy for modern interpreters to map that description onto biblical landscapes and characters, even when the original text never uses the same names or theological categories.
Some commentators have gone further, suggesting that the papyrus could confirm the existence of a lost race of “biblical giants” who once roamed the Levant. Reports highlighting how Experts think an ancient Egyptian scroll could align with traditions about The Nephilim have framed the document as a rare non-Israelite testimony that such beings were known beyond the Bible. For believers who have long argued that scriptural references to giants reflect historical memory rather than myth, the idea that Egyptian scribes also recorded encounters with outsized warriors feels like long-awaited external validation.
What Egyptologists say the text really describes
Professional Egyptologists, however, have pushed back hard against the claim that Papyrus Anastasi proves giants were real. One prominent scholar has pointed out that The Anastasi I papyrus has not just “resurfaced” and that Egyptologists have published, translated, and analyzed it for decades, none of which supports the idea that it documents a race of giants. In that reading, the letter’s exaggerated descriptions of foreign enemies are part of its satirical and pedagogical purpose, using hyperbole to test a student’s command of language and geography rather than to record literal measurements. The suggestion that the text has been hidden or suppressed is flatly rejected as Unverified based on available sources.
On social media, the same scholar has emphasized that Egyptologists Kenneth Kitchen and Donald Redford, both major figures in the study of the Bible and Egyptian history, never treated Papyrus Anastasi as evidence for giants despite their extensive work on intersections between the two traditions. He has also shared an image of the Shasu, a group of Levantine nomads, from Egyptian art that depicts them as taller than any Egyptian, arguing that artistic convention and ideological messaging often portrayed foreigners as physically imposing. In that context, the claim that Egyptologists Kenneth Kitchen and Donald Redford would have missed a clear reference to giants in a text they knew well is difficult to sustain.
Another detailed thread has stated bluntly that this interpretation is not correct, insisting that no serious specialist believes the papyrus confirms the existence of biblical giants. That critique stresses that the document is a complex literary composition, not a simple field report, and that its language about tall enemies fits a broader pattern of rhetorical exaggeration in Egyptian texts. The argument that the scroll has only now been recognized as evidence for giants is described as a misunderstanding of how Egyptologists work with such material, and as a reminder that viral interpretations rarely match the careful, incremental conclusions of academic research.
Why the “giants” debate is not going away
Despite scholarly objections, the idea that this 3,300-year-old papyrus hints that Bible’s giant humans may be real has proven remarkably sticky. Part of the appeal lies in the way the story has been framed: a Resurfaced 3,300-year-old Egyptian document hints at biblical giants being real, suggesting that a dusty artifact has suddenly stepped into a modern faith-and-science argument. Coverage has described how the decades-old document has recently been Resurfaced by an Resurfaced Egyptian scroll project and promoted by groups eager to show that biblical narratives have external corroboration. For audiences primed to see archaeology as a series of “proofs” or “disproofs” of scripture, the notion that a single letter might tip the scales is irresistible.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
