Along a quiet bend of the Farmington River in Connecticut, an excavation has peeled back the soil to reveal a Native American camp that predates the pyramids, Stonehenge, and most of the world’s known ancient monuments. Archaeologists working here say the site, roughly 12,500 years old, captures a moment when some of the earliest people in New England paused on a river terrace, lit fires, shaped stone, and left behind a dense scatter of tools and debris that still holds their story.
What has emerged from this patch of ground is not just a trove of artifacts but a rare, high‑resolution snapshot of life at the end of the Ice Age, when small bands of Paleoindian hunters were testing new landscapes as the glaciers retreated. I see this discovery as a crucial bridge between sweeping theories about the peopling of the Americas and the intimate details of how families actually lived, cooked, and worked on a single stretch of riverbank.
The quiet riverbank that rewrites regional prehistory
The site sits on a low terrace above the Farmington River in the town of Avon, where highway work first exposed an unusually dense layer of stone flakes and tools. What looked at first like a routine construction find quickly turned into a major Paleoindian excavation once specialists realized the artifacts were deeply buried and associated with intact hearths, a combination that strongly points to a very early occupation. The location, perched safely above flood level yet close to water and game, fits what archaeologists expect from a favored seasonal camp at the end of the Ice Age.
Local historians now refer to the discovery as the Brian D. Jones Paleoindian Site, and it has become a focal point for understanding how early Native American groups used the Farmington River corridor. The broader project, documented by the Avon Historical Society, shows how the terrace preserved a stratified record of activity that would otherwise have been erased by development, turning a modern infrastructure project into a window on deep time along the Farmington River.
How a road project led to a 12,500-year-old camp
The excavation began when workers encountered artifacts during a Connecticut Department of Transportation project, triggering a full archaeological investigation. The CT DOT contracted Archaeological and Historical Services, often referred to as AHS of Storrs, to carry out a systematic dig, and their team soon realized they were dealing with a remarkably early and undisturbed Paleoindian occupation. Instead of a thin scatter of finds, they uncovered dense clusters of stone tools and flakes that suggested people had spent real time here, not just passed through.
As AHS expanded the excavation, they documented more than 15 discrete concentrations of artifacts, hearths, and activity areas that together mapped out a compact but busy camp. Reporting on the project notes that these features were carefully recorded and interpreted by specialists, including Lucianne Lavin, Retire Director of Research and Collections, who helped frame the site as a key piece of early Native history along the Farmington River, a role highlighted in a detailed project overview from Archaeological and Historical Services.
Thousands of artifacts, 15,000 clues
What sets this camp apart is not just its age but its sheer density of material. Archaeologists working at the Avon terrace recovered about 15,000 artifacts from the Paleoindian layers alone, an extraordinary number for such an early site. Most of the finds are small flakes and fragments from stone tool production, but mixed among them are finished spear points, scrapers, and other implements that together outline a full toolkit for hunting, butchering, hide working, and daily chores.
Coverage of the excavation emphasizes that these 15,000 pieces are part of a broader haul of thousands of artifacts from a 12,500-year-old Native American site in Connecticut, a scale that allows researchers to move beyond isolated “type” specimens and instead reconstruct how tools were made, used, and discarded across the camp. Reports on the discovery describe how workers first noticed the material during construction, then watched as archaeologists exposed a dense scatter of stone that they now see as evidence of some of southern New England’s earliest inhabitants, a story captured in detail in accounts of the thousands of artifacts recovered there.
Inside a Paleoindian toolkit
When I look at the Avon assemblage, what stands out is how complete the technological story is, from raw stone to finished tools and broken castoffs. The Paleoindian occupants brought in high quality stone, shaped it into long, thin blades and fluted points, then resharpened and recycled those tools until they were exhausted. The waste flakes show each step of that process, while the finished pieces reveal a level of craftsmanship that would be impressive in any era, let alone at the end of the Ice Age.
Comparable Paleoindian sites in the region help flesh out what those tools were used for. A report on a stash of Paleoindian artifacts at a 12,000-Year-Old Connecticut Site describes how similar blades, scrapers, and gravers were likely used for butchering animals, processing hides, and preparing food, with some tools cached for later use. The Avon material, with its mix of production debris and worn tools, fits that pattern, suggesting a camp where people were actively hunting, processing meat, and maintaining gear rather than simply passing through with a few curated weapons.
Hearths, food, and the rhythm of camp life
Beyond the stone tools, the Avon site is valuable because it preserves the quieter traces of daily life that often vanish from the archaeological record. Hearths, ash lenses, and concentrations of burned stone point to repeated episodes of cooking and heating, while the spatial patterning of artifacts hints at distinct work areas around those fires. I see these features as the closest thing we have to a floor plan of a 12,500-year-old campsite, with zones for toolmaking, food preparation, and perhaps sleeping or storage.
Other Paleoindian sites in Connecticut show how much information can be squeezed from such features. At the 12,000-Year-Old Connecticut Site where a Stash of Paleoindian Artifacts Found was documented, archaeologists identified hearths used for the preparation of food and linked them to nearby clusters of tools, a pattern that helps interpret similar arrangements at Avon. The description of that earlier excavation notes that the Paleoindian site settlement uncovered there included activity areas organized around fire pits, a model that strongly supports reading the Avon hearths as focal points of camp life rather than random burn marks, as outlined in the detailed discussion of the Paleoindian site settlement.
Why 12,500 years matters in the story of the Americas
Placing the Avon camp at roughly 12,500 years ago drops it into a pivotal moment in the broader debate over how and when people first spread across the Americas. For decades, the dominant model held that the earliest widespread culture was Clovis, appearing around 13,000 years ago and radiating out from the interior of North America. A site like Avon, with its early date and rich artifact assemblage in New England, shows that by 12,500 years ago, highly mobile hunter‑gatherers were already well established on the northeastern fringe of the continent, adapting to postglacial forests and river valleys.
Current syntheses of the peopling of the Americas emphasize that Any archaeological evidence of coastal occupation during the last Ice Age would now have been covered by sea level rise, which complicates efforts to trace the earliest migrations. Overviews of this research point to places like the Swan Point Archaeological Site in eastern central Alaska, occupied around 12,000 BCE, as benchmarks for early human presence, and they situate later sites like Avon within a second wave of expansion into deglaciated regions. The Avon camp therefore fits into a continental pattern described in summaries of the peopling of the Americas, where early groups moved from initial footholds in Alaska and along the Pacific into interior and eastern landscapes as ice sheets retreated.
How Avon compares with other early American sites
To grasp the significance of Avon, I find it useful to set it alongside other early sites in the eastern United States that have challenged older timelines. One of the best known is Cactus Hill in Virginia, where excavations on a sandy terrace above the Nottoway River revealed deeply buried layers that may predate classic Clovis occupations. The site’s earliest component includes small blades, cores, and several Clovis tools, suggesting a long sequence of use that spans the critical window when people were first exploring the mid‑Atlantic region.
Descriptions of Cactus Hill emphasize that its stratified deposits and distinctive tool types make it one of the oldest known archaeological sites in North America, a benchmark for evaluating other early finds. Against that backdrop, Avon’s 12,500-year-old occupation looks less like an outlier and more like part of a broader mosaic of early camps stretching from Virginia through New England. Together, these sites show that by the time the Avon hunters were knapping stone on the Farmington River terrace, people had already been experimenting with diverse environments across the eastern seaboard for centuries.
Granby, Salmon Brook, and a growing Paleoindian corridor
The Avon discovery does not stand alone in Connecticut’s interior uplands. Just to the north, along Salmon Brook in Granby, archaeologists and local historians have documented additional traces of early Native American presence that help fill in the regional picture. These finds, while not as spectacular in scale as Avon, suggest that the Farmington River and its tributaries formed a natural corridor for Paleoindian and later groups moving between the Connecticut River valley and the upland plateaus.
Accounts from the Salmon Brook Historical Society describe how surveys along the brook have turned up stone tools and other evidence of ancient activity, reinforcing the idea that this part of the state has been a favored route and resource zone for thousands of years. The Granby material, summarized in discussions of archaeology in Granby, complements the Avon site by showing that early Native American use of the landscape was not confined to a single terrace but spread across a network of river and stream valleys that offered water, game, and travel routes.
From construction zone to community touchstone
What began as a compliance dig ahead of a transportation project has quickly become a touchstone for local identity and education in Avon. Community groups, schools, and historical societies have embraced the site as a way to connect present‑day residents with a deep Native American past that long predated colonial settlement. Public talks, exhibits, and digital resources now use the Avon camp to explain how archaeologists work, why context matters, and what life might have looked like for families living on the Farmington River terrace 12,500 years ago.
A recent feature on the discovery frames it as Unearthing History, highlighting The Discovery of a 12,500 year old Paleo-Indian Site along the Farmington River in Avon CT and tracing how the project moved from initial find to full excavation and public interpretation. That account, which describes the site as a Paleo Indian Site of exceptional importance, underscores how quickly the story has moved beyond technical reports into broader conversations about heritage and stewardship, a shift captured in the narrative of Unearthing History.
Why this ancient camp still matters today
For me, the power of the Avon site lies in how it collapses the distance between our world and that of people who lived 12,500 years ago. The stone tools and hearths are undeniably ancient, yet the basic needs they reflect, food, warmth, safety, and community, are instantly recognizable. Standing on that terrace, it is easy to imagine families watching the river, tending fires, and planning the next day’s hunt, much as people still plan their lives around the rhythms of work, weather, and landscape.
At the same time, the site is a reminder of how fragile such windows into the past can be. Without the CT DOT project and the decision to bring in Archaeological and Historical Services, the Avon camp might have been destroyed without record, its 15,000 artifacts scattered or buried under asphalt. Instead, careful excavation and collaboration with local groups like the Avon Historical Society and the Salmon Brook Historical Society have turned it into a case study in how modern development, when paired with rigorous archaeology, can reveal rather than erase the deepest layers of American history.
Supporting sources: Archaeologists uncover 12,500-year-old site in Avon, showing ….
More from MorningOverview