A byproduct of aging nuclear weapons stockpiles could help power spacecraft on missions lasting decades. Americium-241, an isotope that can be separated from aged plutonium, is being studied as a potential alternative to the scarce plutonium-238 that has fueled deep space probes since the Voyager era. Recent NASA-reported testing using americium-241 heat-source simulators suggests that, when paired with advanced Stirling generators, an americium-based approach could provide usable electrical power far from the Sun, despite producing less heat per gram than plutonium-238.
Unlike solar arrays, which become impractically large and inefficient in the outer Solar System, radioisotope power systems provide steady heat that can be converted to electricity regardless of distance from the Sun. NASA’s long-running exploration portfolio, highlighted in its curated mission series, depends on such robust power for probes that must operate autonomously for years. As planners look toward more ambitious journeys to the outer planets and beyond, the question is no longer whether radioisotope power will be needed, but which isotope can reliably sustain the next generation of spacecraft.
January 2025 Tests Hit Their Targets
In January 2025, according to NASA’s write-up, engineers at NASA Glenn Research Center and the University of Leicester completed a test campaign that used americium-241 heat-source simulators to drive a Stirling generator testbed. NASA reported that stated performance and efficiency targets were met, a result that strengthens the case for further development of americium-based radioisotope power systems. Stirling conversion technology can yield higher electrical output than the thermoelectric converters used in legacy systems like those aboard Voyager and New Horizons. Where traditional thermoelectrics waste most of their thermal input, Stirling engines recapture a larger fraction as usable electricity, which directly offsets americium’s lower thermal output per unit mass.
That efficiency gain matters because americium-241 produces roughly 0.1145 watts per gram, based on foundational calorimetric measurements of the isotope’s specific power. Plutonium-238, by comparison, generates about four times more heat per gram. The tradeoff is longevity: americium-241 has a half-life of approximately 432.7 years, meaning a power source built around it would decay far more slowly than one using plutonium-238. For missions designed to operate over many decades, that slow decay rate translates into a more stable power curve, even if the starting output is lower.
Why Plutonium-238 Alone Cannot Sustain Exploration
The global supply of plutonium-238 has been a bottleneck for planetary science for years. Production essentially halted after the Cold War, and restarting it has been slow and expensive. Americium-241, by contrast, accumulates as a decay product inside retired plutonium from nuclear weapons programs, making it far more accessible. The U.S. Department of Energy’s isotope program notes americium-241’s availability from aged plutonium and describes ongoing work around its production and use. The isotope is already being evaluated as a heat source for radioisotope thermoelectric generators.
In a 2021 paper, researchers Dustin and Borrelli conducted a theoretical case study of nine potential non-plutonium fuels for radioisotope power systems. Americium-241 stood out because of its availability and its extremely long half-life, which makes sustained power delivery over the course of a mission a desired characteristic. Most coverage of the plutonium shortage frames the problem as a production challenge. But the deeper issue is strategic: tying every outer-planet mission to a single scarce isotope means that launch schedules, mission designs, and international partnerships all hinge on a supply chain that has repeatedly failed to keep pace with demand. Americium offers a way to decouple mission planning from that constraint.
Engineering Around the Power Penalty
Lower specific power is not a trivial obstacle. A NASA conference paper modeling americium-241 as a substitute for plutonium-238 in Stirling-based radioisotope power systems quantified the expected power penalties, the additional module counts required to match nominal output, and the system mass and thermal transport implications of the switch. Scaling from tens of watts to multi-kilowatt electrical systems with americium requires more fuel pellets and heavier thermal management hardware. The NASA Glenn Stirling program describes how higher conversion efficiency and favorable degradation behavior in Stirling systems can partially compensate, but mission designers still face real weight and volume costs.
The honest critique of current americium enthusiasm is that most published analyses remain theoretical or use simulators rather than actual radioactive fuel. The January 2025 tests at Glenn used heat-source simulators, not live americium pellets, which means thermal behavior under real radiation fields and long-duration operation has not yet been demonstrated in an integrated system. Bridging that gap will require handling actual americium-241, with all the regulatory and safety infrastructure that entails. Still, the simulator results met their targets, and the Stirling architecture’s higher efficiency narrows the performance gap enough to make the engineering plausible rather than aspirational.
Europe’s Head Start on Safety Qualification
The European Space Agency has been developing americium-241-based power systems since 2009, according to a peer-reviewed paper in the Journal of Space Safety Engineering that details safety-driven work on multilayer fuel containment, impact testing approaches, and modeling for launch and re-entry accident scenarios. ESA hopes the technology will, by the end of this decade, allow it to operate spacecraft without relying on equipment from international partners, as reported by a Nature news feature. European work on safety cases is especially important because public acceptance of nuclear power in space hinges on credible analysis of worst-case failures, including launch pad explosions and uncontrolled re-entries.
That groundwork could dovetail with NASA’s broader science portfolio, which spans Earth observations, Solar System exploration, and astrophysics missions. As described in NASA’s overview of Earth science activities, reliable power sources already underpin continuous measurements of climate, oceans, and the atmosphere from orbit. In the outer Solar System, where sunlight is weak, americium-based systems could support probes catalogued in NASA’s planetary exploration programs, from icy moon landers to long-lived orbiters. Farther afield, radioisotope power could sustain observatories studying black holes, exoplanets, and cosmic structure, complementing the agency’s astrophysics missions that already push the limits of distance and duration.
From Waste Product to Strategic Resource
Americium-241’s appeal is inseparable from its origin story. What begins as a waste product of weapons plutonium can be chemically separated, encapsulated, and turned into a power source that enables peaceful exploration. This potential re-use aligns with NASA’s public-facing efforts, showcased on its central science and storytelling platform, to connect cutting-edge technology with broader societal benefits. Recasting legacy nuclear materials as enablers of planetary science and astrophysics is more than a branding exercise; it is a way to secure long-term political and financial support for the infrastructure needed to handle and process these isotopes safely.
If current testing and safety qualification efforts succeed, americium-241 could transition from a niche research topic into a more widely used element of future mission architectures. The engineering compromises are real: heavier power systems, more complex thermal designs, and the need for rigorous launch safety cases. Yet those costs may be acceptable when weighed against the alternative of flying fewer missions or delaying them indefinitely while waiting for limited plutonium-238 production to catch up. In that sense, americium-241 is not just a backup fuel; it is a strategic hedge that could influence how boldly future deep-space missions are designed and scheduled.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
