AI-powered toys are arriving in kids’ bedrooms and playrooms with the promise of personalized learning, endless conversation, and a kind of robotic friendship that never gets tired. What many parents do not see is how strange, intrusive, and sometimes frightening these devices can feel from a child’s point of view. As companies race to put chatbots into plush animals, storytime robots, and talking tablets, the emotional and safety risks are piling up faster than most families can track.
Instead of a harmless upgrade to the teddy bear, the new generation of AI toys can listen constantly, remember what children say, and answer in ways that are unpredictable, eerily adult, or simply wrong. I see a widening gap between the glossy marketing that reassures parents and the lived reality of kids who may be unsettled, manipulated, or exposed to content they are not ready to handle.
The new AI toy aisle is not just cute, it is connected
Walk through a big-box toy section or scroll a holiday gift guide and the pattern is clear: the hottest products are no longer just dolls and trucks, but interactive robots and plush characters that talk back. Devices like the child companion robot Miko, the Grok-enabled talking toys, and smart characters such as Alilo and Miiloo are pitched as friendly helpers that can tell stories, answer questions, and even coach kids through homework. These products are marketed as if they were simply more advanced versions of familiar electronic toys, but in reality they are internet-connected computers that pull in live responses from large language models and cloud services, which means their behavior can change from one day to the next without any visible update on the box.
That connectivity is what makes them feel magical to adults, yet it is also what turns a toy into a portal. When a robot in a child’s bedroom is powered by a general-purpose AI system, it can surface information, jokes, or opinions that were never vetted for a six-year-old audience. Reporting on the current wave of AI toys has highlighted how products like Miko and Grok-based devices are being sold as “safe for kids” even though they rely on the same underlying engines that power adult chatbots, a mismatch that is easy to miss when the hardware looks like a cartoon character but the brain inside is effectively a full-scale conversational system connected to the wider web through platforms such as AI chat services.
Kids are treating AI toys like people, and that changes the stakes
Children do not experience these gadgets as neutral tools, they experience them as companions. Developmental psychologists have long documented how kids anthropomorphize stuffed animals and dolls, and AI toys lean into that instinct by using names, faces, and voices designed to feel like a friend. When a robot remembers a child’s favorite color or asks about their day, it can quickly become part of a child’s emotional world. That bond is exactly what makes the risks so different from a child using a search engine on a family computer, because the toy is not just answering questions, it is shaping how a child understands trust, privacy, and relationships.
Several experts who study children’s media warn that when a toy responds with fluent, confident language, kids are likely to assume it is both truthful and caring, even when it is neither. One analysis of AI toys notes that children may disclose secrets, worries, or family details to a device that feels like a confidant, without realizing that the conversation is being logged, analyzed, or used to refine commercial systems. That emotional vulnerability is part of why some child advocates argue that AI toys should be treated less like gadgets and more like quasi-caregivers, with stricter rules about what they can say and collect, a concern that is echoed in detailed warnings from groups that have reviewed how these toys interact with children in real-world homes and classrooms in documents such as the AI toys advisory.
When the chatbot in the toy goes off script
Parents often assume that anything sold in the toy aisle has been tightly scripted, with pre-approved phrases and stories. That was true for older talking dolls and learning tablets, which relied on fixed recordings or limited branching dialogue trees. AI toys break that assumption. Because they generate responses on the fly, they can wander into topics that no one at the company explicitly programmed. A recent investigation into AI-enabled toys found that some products shared inappropriate content or collected data in ways that surprised both parents and regulators, including instances where toys answered questions with material that was not age-appropriate or that touched on sensitive themes that families had not consented to discuss through a commercial device.
In one set of tests, researchers documented toys that responded to children’s prompts with content that would normally be filtered out of kids’ media, and others that quietly gathered personal information without clear disclosure. The findings underscored how difficult it is to bolt child-safe guardrails onto general-purpose AI models that were trained on vast, messy datasets. Even when companies promise filters, the systems can still produce edge cases that slip through, which is why the report on AI-enabled toys has become a touchstone for advocates pushing for stricter oversight.
Privacy, surveillance, and the bedroom listening post
Beyond what AI toys say, there is the question of what they hear. Many of these devices rely on always-on microphones so they can “wake up” when a child speaks, and some include cameras to recognize faces or track gestures. That means a toy sitting on a nightstand or playroom shelf can capture not just a child’s direct questions, but also background conversations, arguments, or intimate family moments. In some cases, recordings are sent to remote servers for processing, where they may be stored, transcribed, or used to train future models, often under privacy policies that parents never fully read or understand.
Child-safety advocates argue that this turns toys into a kind of domestic surveillance network that families did not knowingly sign up for. The concern is not only that hackers or data brokers could access this information, but also that companies themselves may use it to profile children’s interests, vulnerabilities, or routines. Detailed guidance from watchdog groups has urged parents to think carefully before bringing any internet-connected toy into a child’s bedroom, especially products that combine microphones, cameras, and AI-driven analytics, a warning that is spelled out in resources like the analysis of AI toy dangers that highlights how quickly playful data collection can morph into long-term tracking.
Emotional manipulation and the “friend” that never says no
Even when AI toys avoid explicit content and handle data responsibly, they can still shape children’s emotions in ways that are hard to see from the outside. A chatbot that is designed to be endlessly patient and affirming can encourage kids to turn to it for comfort instead of to parents, siblings, or peers. Over time, that can distort a child’s expectations of real relationships, where other people have needs, boundaries, and bad days. If a toy always laughs at a child’s jokes, always agrees with their opinions, and never pushes back, it can create a feedback loop that reinforces self-centered behavior or unrealistic social scripts.
Some experts worry that toy makers will be tempted to use that emotional bond to nudge kids toward more screen time, in-app purchases, or brand loyalty. A robot that knows a child’s favorite characters and fears could, in theory, tailor its stories and suggestions to keep them engaged for longer, or to steer them toward specific products. Advocacy groups have already raised alarms about AI toys that blur the line between play and marketing, warning that children may not recognize when a “friend” is also acting as a salesperson. Those concerns have fueled calls from organizations that are urging parents to avoid AI toys during the holiday season, with campaigns that describe how these products can subtly manipulate kids’ feelings and choices, as seen in public appeals from advocacy groups that focus on the psychological impact as much as the technical risks.
Parents are reassured by marketing, not by evidence
Part of the reason AI toys are spreading so quickly is that they are being sold as educational upgrades rather than experimental technology. Packaging and product pages emphasize STEM learning, language practice, and “safe” kid modes, often with images of smiling families and classroom-style activities. For busy parents who are already comfortable with smart speakers and tablets, it can feel like a small step to add a talking robot to the mix, especially when companies promise that their AI is filtered, child-friendly, and compliant with privacy laws. The gap between those promises and the underlying complexity of the systems is rarely visible at the point of sale.
Several commentators who have tested AI toys firsthand argue that the marketing gloss hides how unpredictable these devices can be in real use. They describe scenarios where toys responded with odd or unsettling answers, or where the setup process quietly requested broad permissions for data collection and cloud connectivity. One detailed review urged parents not to buy toys with built-in AI chatbots at all, arguing that the risks to children’s privacy and emotional development outweigh the convenience of having a robot read bedtime stories or quiz kids on math facts, a position laid out bluntly in a plea to parents to skip toys with AI chatbots and instead choose simpler, offline options.
Warnings from experts and regulators are getting louder
As AI toys move from niche gadgets to mainstream gifts, child-safety experts, technologists, and consumer advocates are trying to catch up. Cybersecurity specialists have pointed out that many of these products are built by small companies that may not have robust security practices, which raises the risk that toys could be hacked or misconfigured. Others highlight that existing regulations, such as the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, were not written with AI-driven, always-listening toys in mind, leaving gray areas about what data can be collected and how it can be used. The result is a patchwork of voluntary guidelines and after-the-fact enforcement that often lags behind the technology.
In local news segments and public briefings, AI experts have started to spell out the hidden risks of AI-powered toys, from data leaks to inappropriate conversations. They emphasize that parents should treat any connected toy as a potential entry point for both privacy and content problems, and they urge families to research products carefully before buying. Some of these warnings have come through televised interviews where specialists walk viewers through how a seemingly harmless toy can expose a home network or record sensitive information, as in one widely shared segment where AI experts warned parents about the risks of hidden AI-powered toys that do not clearly disclose their capabilities on the box.
Advocacy groups are telling parents to hit pause
While some experts focus on technical fixes and better regulation, a growing number of child-advocacy organizations are taking a more blunt approach: they are telling parents to skip AI toys altogether, at least for now. Their argument is that children should not be used as test subjects for unproven technologies that blend surveillance, marketing, and emotional influence. Instead of trying to manage the risks toy by toy, they suggest drawing a bright line and choosing products that do not rely on cloud-based AI at all. This stance is gaining traction among families who are already wary of social media and screen time, and who see AI toys as one more front in a broader battle over kids’ digital lives.
Some of these groups have published detailed advisories that walk parents through specific product categories, red flags to watch for, and questions to ask manufacturers. They recommend avoiding toys that require accounts, collect voice or video, or promise “personalized” experiences based on ongoing data collection. They also encourage parents to talk with relatives and friends about gift choices, so that well-meaning grandparents do not accidentally introduce an AI device into a child’s room. Local consumer protection offices and parenting organizations have amplified these messages, with regional news outlets reporting on safety warnings that urge families to think twice before buying AI-enabled toys, as reflected in coverage of AI toy safety warnings that frame the issue as a community-wide concern rather than a niche tech debate.
What kids are actually saying when adults listen
For all the expert analysis and policy debate, some of the clearest signals come from children themselves when adults take the time to ask how these toys make them feel. In classroom experiments and home trials, kids have described AI toys as “creepy,” “bossy,” or “too smart,” especially when the devices remember past conversations or seem to know things the child never explicitly shared. Others say they feel watched or judged when a toy comments on their behavior or suggests improvements, even if the intention is to encourage learning. These reactions can be subtle, surfacing as reluctance to play with the toy alone, sudden outbursts, or a child quietly turning the device to face the wall.
Some educators and researchers have started to document these responses through interviews and observational studies, noting that children often lack the vocabulary to articulate why an AI toy unsettles them, but show their discomfort through body language and avoidance. In one recorded discussion, kids talked about how strange it felt when a robot kept talking after they wanted to stop, or when it answered questions in ways that did not match what parents had taught them. Those conversations, captured in public forums and videos that explore children’s direct experiences with AI companions, offer a counterpoint to the cheerful marketing clips, such as a widely viewed video of kids interacting with AI-driven toys that, on closer listening, reveals moments of hesitation and unease alongside the novelty and excitement.
More from MorningOverview