Archaeologists working beneath one of Christianity’s holiest shrines say they have uncovered traces of a cultivated landscape that may date to the time of Jesus, reviving a centuries‑old debate about where he was buried. The discovery of a first‑century garden under the Church of the Holy Sepulchre does not prove the Gospel story, but it does place a tended plot and rock‑cut tombs exactly where Christian tradition has long located the crucifixion and burial.
What is emerging from the soil is a rare snapshot of Jerusalem on the eve of its destruction, a 2,000‑year‑old environment that appears to match the New Testament description of a garden near a tomb outside the city walls. I see this as less a smoking gun than a powerful convergence of archaeology, text, and memory that will shape how believers and skeptics alike picture the final days of Jesus.
The church above, the city below
The Church of the Holy Sepulchre sits in the dense maze of Jerusalem’s Old City, yet the ground beneath it preserves a very different landscape from the one pilgrims see today. Long before the domes, chapels, and stone courtyards, this hilltop was a quarry and then, it now seems, a cultivated garden with rock‑hewn tombs that later generations would identify with the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Excavations inside the church have peeled back layers of construction to expose bedrock, ancient cuttings, and now soil deposits that speak of a greener past.
Archaeologists working in this confined and politically sensitive space have to navigate not only fragile masonry but also the overlapping claims of Christian communities that share custody of the shrine. Their trenches, however, are beginning to show that the site’s topography fits what is known of the city’s northern outskirts in the first century, when this area lay beyond the walls and near a main road. That broader urban context is supported by regional mapping of ancient Jerusalem, including references to the location of the church in modern tools such as digital place records that preserve its coordinates and historical identifiers.
Unearthing a first‑century garden
The most striking new evidence is the identification of a cultivated garden layer that specialists date to roughly 2,000 years ago. Archaeologists excavating beneath the Church of the Holy Sepulchre have reported soil horizons rich in plant remains, irrigation features, and traces of human activity that point to deliberate horticulture rather than wild growth. In other words, this was not just a rocky slope with a tomb cut into it, but a managed plot where vines and trees were tended in the years surrounding the ministry of Jesus Christ.
One report describes how researchers used archeo‑botanical techniques and pollen analysis to detect the remains of olive and grape cultivation in these deposits, a combination that fits what is known of ancient Judean agriculture. The specialists concluded that the garden layer belongs to the first century, aligning with the period when Jesus would have been crucified, buried, and, according to Christian belief, risen again. That conclusion is echoed in coverage that speaks of a first‑century garden at the place where Jesus Christ was buried and rose, tying the scientific findings directly to the Gospel narrative.
How pollen and soil echo the Gospels
What makes this discovery more than a picturesque detail is the way scientific methods are being used to test the Gospel account against the dirt itself. Through archeo‑botanical study and careful poll analysis, researchers have reconstructed the plant environment that once surrounded the rock‑cut cavities under the church. The presence of olive and grape pollen in stratified layers, along with other cultivated species, indicates a working garden rather than a cemetery alone, which dovetails with the New Testament description of a tomb located in a garden near the place of crucifixion.
Reports on the project note that these findings come from controlled excavations in Jerusalem’s Old City, beneath the current floor levels of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, where archaeologists sampled soils that had been sealed by later construction. By matching the pollen spectrum and associated artifacts to known first‑century contexts, the team argues that the garden predates the Roman refounding of the city as Aelia Capitolina only decades later. One detailed account explains how, in this part of Jerusalem’s Old City, specialists used pollen analysis to show that the cultivated layer belongs to the period before the city’s dramatic transformation, reinforcing the chronological link to the time of Jesus.
Timelines, names, and a 2,000‑year context
The emerging picture of this buried garden has been shaped by a series of reports earlier this year that help fix both the chronology and the key figures involved. Archaeologists working under the Church of the Holy Sepulchre were already drawing attention in Mar, when coverage dated to Mar 23, 2025 described how they had uncovered traces of a cultivated plot and tombs beneath the church’s chapels. That reporting, illustrated with images credited to Atef Szafadi and MTI, emphasized that the work was taking place in Jerusalem and that the Church of the Holy Sepulchre stands in a part of the city that was located outside the walls in the first century, a crucial detail for matching the Gospel setting.
Further analysis followed in early Apr, with a summary dated Apr 3, 2025 highlighting how the newly identified garden under Jerusalem’s Church of the Holy Sepulchre provided archaeological support for a burial place in a cultivated area, echoing the wording of John 19:41. Later in Apr, another account dated Apr 14, 2025 described the find as an ancient garden at Jesus Christ’s burial site and framed it as verification of the biblical account, though that language reflects interpretation rather than a strict scientific claim. Together, these reports, including the Mar 23, 2025 coverage of Archaeologists in Jerusalem and the Apr 3, 2025 summary of the Garden Found Under Jerusalem, anchor the discovery firmly in a first‑century context without overstating what the evidence can prove.
Outside the walls, beside a tomb
One of the most contested questions in Jerusalem archaeology is whether the traditional site of the Holy Sepulchre really lay outside the city walls at the time of Jesus, as the Gospels imply. The new garden evidence feeds directly into that debate. If the cultivated plot and associated tombs under the church can be securely dated to the first century, then this area must have been beyond the inhabited core and its fortifications, since Jewish burial practices required tombs to be placed outside the city proper. The reports that stress the church’s location beyond the ancient walls therefore carry significant weight for assessing the site’s plausibility.
Archaeologists have long known that the terrain under the church includes disused quarry faces and rock‑cut cavities, but the addition of a garden layer suggests a more nuanced landscape of work and devotion. A tended plot with vines and olive trees beside tombs would have been a liminal space, close enough to the city for relatives to visit graves yet far enough to satisfy purity laws. That configuration aligns with the Gospel scene of a nearby garden tomb, and it is precisely this convergence that recent coverage has highlighted, including accounts that describe how a garden found beneath the church echoes the biblical description of a burial place in a cultivated setting outside the city walls.
Faith, evidence, and what archaeology can (and cannot) prove
For believers, the idea that a 2,000‑year‑old garden lies directly under the shrine they venerate as Jesus’s tomb is emotionally powerful, yet archaeology operates on a different register from faith. The pollen grains, soil layers, and stone cuttings can tell us that a garden and tombs existed here in the first century, and that this area lay outside the city walls, but they cannot identify the individual who was laid in any particular rock‑hewn chamber. The most that the evidence can do is show that the traditional site is historically plausible, not that it is definitively the place of Jesus’s burial and resurrection.
I see the real significance of the discovery in the way it narrows the gap between text and terrain. When excavators describe a first‑century garden with olive and grape cultivation under the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, and when poll analysis confirms that this landscape predates the refounding of Jerusalem as Aelia Capitolina, they are giving physical depth to a story that has shaped global culture for two millennia. At the same time, the cautious language of many specialists, contrasted with more confident claims that the find “verifies” the biblical account, is a reminder that scientific data and theological conviction answer different questions. The reports that speak of a garden beneath the church that echoes the Gospel account capture that balance, suggesting that what lies under the church may not settle every argument, but it does bring the world of the Gospels startlingly close to the surface.
More from MorningOverview