Scientists have uncovered tens of thousands of previously unseen earthquakes beneath Yellowstone, a reminder that one of the world’s most closely watched volcanic systems is far from quiet even when the surface looks calm. That discovery has sharpened attention in Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho, where communities sit within reach of a supervolcano that is both heavily monitored and widely misunderstood. I want to unpack what those 86,000 hidden quakes really mean, how they fit into Yellowstone’s long history, and why experts still say the current risk level remains low even as public anxiety spikes.
The supervolcano under three states
Yellowstone is not just a national park, it is the exposed top of a vast volcanic system that underlies parts of Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho. The heart of that system is often described as a supervolcano because past eruptions from what geologists call The Yellowstone Plateau volcanic field were large enough to blanket huge areas of the continent in ash. Those ancient events shaped the modern landscape, but they also created a lingering sense that the ground beneath the region is perpetually poised for catastrophe.
That anxiety is amplified by the park’s surface activity, from boiling hot springs to geysers that hint at the heat still rising from below. The broader region, including gateway towns and rural communities in three states, lives with the knowledge that they sit atop a system whose most recent lava flows are geologically young. Yet the same research that documents those past eruptions also shows long quiet intervals and complex cycles, a nuance that is often lost when the word “supervolcano” is reduced to a single apocalyptic image.
How 86,000 hidden quakes came to light
The revelation that more than 86,000 previously undetected earthquakes rattled the subsurface of Yellowstone did not come from a sudden change in the ground, it came from a change in how scientists read the data. Researchers applied advanced pattern recognition to years of seismic records and found that what once looked like background noise actually contained a dense tapestry of tiny events. One analysis of Yellowstone National Park data in the United Stat described how these microquakes cluster in time and space, filling in gaps in the known seismic history.
Another project framed the work as Unveiling Hidden Earthquakes Beneath Yellowstone, a Breakthrough in Seismic Monitoring that casts a New Light on how the crust responds to the restless magma system below. By training algorithms on known quake signatures, scientists could sift through vast archives and pick out events that were too small or too overlapping for traditional methods to resolve. The result is not a sudden surge in shaking, but a sharper picture of what has been happening all along.
AI, secrecy claims, and public anger
The use of artificial intelligence to expose this hidden seismicity has not only changed the science, it has also stirred a political and emotional backlash. One widely shared account, framed under the banner “They Knew and Stayed Silent,” argued that AI Exposes 86,000 Hidden Earthquakes Under Yellowstone and Fuels Rage Over Scientific secrecy. The claim is that AI technology uncovered 86,000 events that had never been shared with the public, feeding a narrative that officials downplayed the supervolcano’s seismic activity and delayed stronger safety measures.
I see a more complicated picture. AI tools are only now becoming powerful enough to pull these microquakes out of the noise, so it is not accurate to say that tens of thousands of events were deliberately hidden in real time. At the same time, the language of secrecy resonates because communication about low level hazards is often technical and opaque, and residents in the three surrounding states are acutely aware that their lives are intertwined with decisions made by distant experts. When people read that 86,000 quakes were “missed,” it feels less like a methodological upgrade and more like a betrayal, even if the underlying data were always part of open seismic archives.
What AI actually sees beneath Yellowstone
To understand what these discoveries mean, it helps to look at how the algorithms work and what they are finding. One team described how, in a place where There is rarely a quiet moment in Yellowstone, AI can comb through continuous seismic streams and flag patterns that match known quake signatures even when individual events are too small to stand out. The result is a catalog that is both deeper and more continuous, revealing swarms of tiny quakes that trace the movement of fluids and the slow adjustment of faults.
In technical terms, these are microearthquakes, often far below the threshold that people at the surface can feel. Yet their distribution matters. Clusters can outline the edges of magma bodies, mark zones where hydrothermal fluids circulate, or show where the crust is stretching. By turning up the sensitivity of the seismic network through software rather than hardware, AI gives researchers a way to watch Yellowstone’s internal plumbing in far greater detail, which in turn can refine models of how stress builds and releases over time.
USGS says “NORMAL” while the ground keeps moving
Against this backdrop of newly revealed quakes, the official hazard posture for Yellowstone remains steady. The U.S. monitoring program lists the current Alert Level as NORMAL and the Color Code as green, and invites the public to Subscribe to the Volcano Notification Service for updates. In the most recent summary, the agency noted that activity is at background levels and that no unusual unrest has been detected that would suggest an impending eruption.
That same update reported that There were no swarms identified during Dec and that Earthquake activity in Yellowstone is at background levels, with Ground De formation limited to small seasonal changes of less than an inch. Those statements, anchored in continuous GPS and seismic measurements, sit uneasily alongside headlines about tens of thousands of hidden quakes. Yet they are not contradictory. The AI catalogs are revealing more detail within what scientists still classify as normal behavior for a large, active volcanic system, rather than a step change toward crisis.
Is seismic activity really increasing?
One of the most charged questions is whether Yellowstone’s seismicity is actually ramping up. A 2025 study described as showing Seismic activity increasing under Yellowstone in the journal Science Advances has been widely cited as evidence that the system is becoming more restless. The work points to patterns in quake frequency and distribution that could indicate evolving stress in the crust, and it has naturally fed speculation about whether Yellowstone is getting ready to erupt.
I read that research as a warning to pay attention, not as a countdown clock. When scientists say Seismic activity is increasing, they are often talking about statistical trends over long windows, not a simple year on year spike that the public can feel. The same study emphasizes that even an uptick in quakes does not automatically translate into a short term eruption forecast. Instead, it underscores the need for dense monitoring and careful interpretation, especially in a place where the baseline level of shaking is already high compared with many other regions.
Yellowstone in the context of other U.S. volcanoes
Yellowstone does not exist in isolation, it is part of a broader arc of active and dormant volcanoes that stretch across the western United States. The CASCADES VOLCANO OBSERVATORY WEEKLY UPDATE, shared in early Jan, noted that over the past week small earthquakes were detected beneath several peaks in the Pacific Northwest, a reminder that the CASCADES VOLCANO OBSERVATORY WEEKLY UPDATE is tracking its own chain of hazards. Those events are not directly linked to Yellowstone, but they show that low level seismicity is a normal feature of many volcanic systems.
In that sense, the 86,000 microquakes under Yellowstone are part of a national pattern of quiet unrest that rarely makes headlines unless it can be framed as a looming disaster. The same agencies that watch the Cascades also keep a close eye on the Yellowstone Plateau volcanic field, using a mix of seismometers, GPS stations, and satellite data. When they say the Alert Level is NORMAL, they are comparing Yellowstone’s behavior not only to its own past, but also to the broader family of volcanoes that have shown clear precursory signals before erupting.
Life and risk in the Yellowstone region
For people living in and around the three states that share Yellowstone’s volcanic footprint, the new seismic catalogs land in a very practical context. Tourism economies in gateway towns depend on the park’s allure, from Old Faithful to the Grand Prismatic Spring, and any hint of elevated risk can ripple through hotel bookings and seasonal hiring. At the same time, residents know that they are exposed to hazards that range from local hydrothermal explosions to the low probability but high impact scenario of a major eruption.
That tension is visible in how local officials talk about preparedness. County emergency managers in Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho routinely fold volcanic scenarios into broader all hazards planning, even as they emphasize that day to day risks like wildfires and winter storms are far more immediate. When news breaks that AI has uncovered 86,000 hidden quakes, it can feel like the ground rules have changed overnight, even though the physical processes have been unfolding for years beneath their feet.
What the hidden quakes really change
So what, in practical terms, does the discovery of 86,000 microquakes actually change for the people watching Yellowstone? From a scientific standpoint, it sharpens models of how stress and fluids move through the crust, which can improve long term hazard assessments and refine the thresholds that might trigger alerts. The work described as a Breakthrough in Seismic Monitoring and an Introduction to a New Light on Yellowstone’s interior is part of a broader push to use machine learning to anticipate volcanic behavior more accurately, not to declare that disaster is imminent.
From a public perspective, the change is more psychological. Knowing that the ground has been chattering away at a level that only machines could hear reinforces the sense that Yellowstone is alive in ways that are both fascinating and unsettling. It also raises fair questions about how transparent monitoring agencies should be about low level activity that does not cross any formal warning thresholds. As AI tools continue to peel back layers of hidden data, the challenge will be to match that technical sophistication with equally sophisticated communication, so that people in Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho can live with a supervolcano in their backyard without swinging between complacency and panic.
Why “NORMAL” does not mean “nothing to see here”
There is a risk that the word NORMAL, repeated in official updates, can sound dismissive in the face of complex and evolving science. When the Yellowstone Plateau volcanic field is described as green NORMAL, with a timestamp of 2026-01-02 21:30:47 UTC and a reference to the volcano’s most recent lava, it is easy to read that as a blanket reassurance that nothing interesting is happening. In reality, NORMAL in this context means that the system is behaving within the range of variability that long term monitoring has documented, which still includes frequent small quakes, ground deformation on the order of millimeters, and constant hydrothermal activity.
I think the more honest message is that NORMAL at Yellowstone is not the same as normal in a tectonically quiet region. The presence of 47 monitoring stations, a figure cited in some technical summaries, reflects how seriously scientists take the task of tracking even subtle changes. For residents and visitors, the key is to understand that a green icon on a hazard map is not a promise that the ground will stay still, but a signal that the experts who watch the data every day see no sign of an escalating crisis, even as they continue to refine their tools and models.
The bigger lesson from 86,000 microquakes
Stepping back, the story of Yellowstone’s hidden earthquakes is less about a single supervolcano and more about how we are learning to listen to a restless planet. AI has given researchers a way to hear whispers in the seismic record that were previously drowned out, and in doing so it has revealed a level of constant adjustment beneath Yellowstone National Park that matches what we might expect from such a large and complex system. The discovery that over 86,000 events were tucked into that noise does not mean the ground is suddenly more dangerous, it means our instruments, both physical and digital, are finally catching up to reality.
For the three states that ring the caldera, the path forward lies in embracing that nuance. It is possible to acknowledge the genuine risks posed by a supervolcano, to demand clear and timely information from agencies, and to recognize that scientific understanding will always be a work in progress. The 86,000 microquakes are a reminder that much of the planet’s activity happens out of sight and out of mind, until new tools bring it into focus. The challenge now is to turn that sharper view into smarter preparedness, rather than letting it fuel only fear.
Yellowstone’s place in the American imagination
Yellowstone has always occupied a unique place in the American imagination, as both a symbol of wild beauty and a lurking geological threat. The park’s iconic features, from geyser basins to the Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone, draw millions of visitors who rarely think about the magma chamber beneath their hiking boots. Yet cultural depictions, from disaster movies to viral social media threads, often fixate on the idea of a supereruption that could blanket the continent in ash, a scenario that, while physically possible, is extremely unlikely on human timescales.
That gap between everyday experience and worst case imagination is part of why stories about hidden quakes and alleged secrecy hit so hard. When I look at the satellite view of the region through tools like this Yellowstone place interface, I am struck by how thin the line is between the familiar outlines of roads and rivers and the vast, slow forces that built them. The revelation of 86,000 microquakes does not redraw that map, but it does remind us that the ground beneath those lines is in constant motion, and that living with a supervolcano means learning to read that motion with as much clarity and humility as our tools allow.
More from MorningOverview