Morning Overview

6 states brace for surprise snow even as temps run strangely warm

Six states stretching from the Sierra Nevada to the Southeast are preparing for measurable snowfall this week, even as daytime temperatures in parts of the Midwest push into the 50s and low 60s. The collision of warm air and active storm systems is producing a pattern that defies simple winter logic: snow is falling, but the atmosphere around it feels more like early spring. This tension between accumulation and anomalous warmth is not just a curiosity; it carries real consequences for water supply, travel safety, and the reliability of the forecasting tools we depend on.

Sierra Snow and Midwest Warmth: A Split-Screen Winter

The Weather Prediction Center’s short-range forecast discussion, valid from February 16 through February 18, 2026, identifies heavy snow focused on the Sierra Nevada alongside light snow potential over parts of the Northern Mid-Atlantic. California and Nevada sit squarely in the crosshairs of the Sierra system, while Iowa and Illinois occupy a stranger position: they face snow and ice risks even as the National Weather Service office in the Quad Cities highlights unseasonably mild conditions with highs in the 40s and 50s, reaching the 50s to low 60s in the near term. That kind of warmth typically suppresses snow, yet incoming frontal boundaries can still squeeze out accumulation when moisture and upper-level dynamics cooperate. The result is a forecast that looks contradictory on the surface but makes physical sense when you account for rapid temperature swings around frontal passages.

Further south, the Carolinas and northern Georgia round out the six-state list. An AP News report from late January documented a storm that could dump at least 6 inches of snow with white-out conditions in the Carolinas and northern Georgia, and while that specific event has passed, it established a pattern this winter of southern states catching snow that historically stays farther north. The current setup echoes that dynamic. Warm surface temperatures do not rule out snowfall; they shift where the rain-snow line sets up and how quickly accumulation melts, making forecasts harder to pin down and road conditions more unpredictable. For residents who may have already put away snow shovels after recent warm spells, the reappearance of accumulating snow underscores how volatile late-winter patterns can be when cold air arrives in short, sharp bursts rather than long, locked-in outbreaks.

How Probabilistic Tools Track Surprise Snow

Forecasters are not guessing when they flag snow risk in warm environments. The Weather Prediction Center’s Probabilistic Winter Precipitation Forecast, known as PWPF, generates snowfall probability maps that show the odds of exceeding thresholds such as 1 inch, 2 inches, and 4 inches out to 72 hours. The system converts deterministic model output into probability ranges using ensemble data, precipitation-type algorithms, and snow-level determination, all developed in collaboration with local Weather Forecast Offices. That collaboration matters because local offices contribute ground-truth knowledge about terrain, microclimates, and elevation bands that national models can miss. When the PWPF shows meaningful odds for accumulation in a state where afternoon highs are running 15 degrees above normal, it reflects a genuine signal, not a model glitch.

Alongside the PWPF, the Winter Storm Severity Index translates raw snowfall numbers into impact categories. The WSSI evaluates components including snow amount, snow load, ice accumulation, and blowing snow, then assigns ratings that range from minor through moderate, major, and extreme, according to the Weather Prediction Center’s impact-based index. The product updates every two hours and blends forecast data with non-meteorological and climatological inputs, which means it accounts for factors like population density and infrastructure vulnerability. For a driver in North Carolina or a utility crew in Iowa, the difference between a “minor” and “major” WSSI rating can determine whether roads stay open or power lines come down. That practical translation is what makes the tool useful beyond the meteorology community, turning complex model output into accessible guidance about when to cancel events, pre-treat highways, or stage repair crews ahead of damaging ice and wind.

Warm Temperatures Are Rewriting Western Snowpack

The warm-temperature half of this story carries longer-term weight, especially in the West. A February 5, 2026 update from Drought.gov documents that early water-year precipitation across multiple western states fell mainly as rain instead of snow due to record-breaking temperatures. The report uses SNOTEL-based measurements and snow-water-equivalent percentile logic to quantify the deficit. When precipitation arrives warm enough to fall as rain at elevations that normally accumulate snowpack, the water runs off immediately rather than storing in the mountains for spring and summer melt. That distinction is not academic. Western water managers, farmers, and municipalities depend on gradual snowmelt to fill reservoirs through the dry season, and an early-season “snow drought” can reverberate months later in the form of tighter water allocations and heightened wildfire risk.

This dynamic creates an odd feedback loop for the current forecast. The Sierra Nevada may receive heavy snow this week, but if the broader pattern continues to favor warm temperatures at lower and mid elevations, much of that snow could melt faster than historical averages suggest. Snow-water equivalent, the metric that tells water managers how much liquid is locked in the snowpack, can look adequate on a single measurement day and then collapse within weeks if warm spells persist. A two-foot dump at 8,000 feet means far less for California’s water supply if the freezing level keeps bouncing above 7,000 feet between storms. The Drought.gov analysis points to exactly this kind of warm-snow-drought pattern taking hold across parts of the West, where intermittent cold snaps still deliver headline-grabbing storms but fail to rebuild a stable, long-lasting snowpack that can carry rivers and reservoirs through late summer.

The National Weather Service Behind the Forecasts

Behind the scenes of these winter storylines is a national forecasting infrastructure designed to handle such complexity. The National Weather Service operates as part of the federal weather enterprise, with a mission to protect lives and property through forecasts, warnings, and impact based decision support. Its public-facing forecasts and hazard products are anchored on the central portal at weather.gov, where users can enter a ZIP code to retrieve local forecasts, radar, and winter weather advisories. That single entry point masks a highly distributed operation. More than a hundred local Weather Forecast Offices feed localized expertise into national centers that specialize in hazards ranging from winter storms to hurricanes and river flooding.

The structure of the agency is laid out in its organizational overview, which shows how regional offices, national centers, and specialized support units fit together. Among those national centers is the National Centers for Environmental Prediction, or NCEP, which serves as a hub for numerical modeling and guidance products that underpin tools like the PWPF and WSSI. Through the NCEP gateway, meteorologists access global and regional models, ensemble systems, and analysis fields that describe the evolving atmosphere in three dimensions. Local forecasters then blend this guidance with observations and local climatology to craft area-specific forecasts, ensuring that a snow map for the Sierra or the Carolinas reflects both cutting-edge modeling and on-the-ground experience with how storms interact with local terrain and land use.

Living With a Split-Season Pattern

The juxtaposition of heavy Sierra snow, southern flakes, and Midwestern warmth underscores how winter is increasingly defined by swings rather than steady states. For travelers, that means planning around windows of rapid change: a morning that starts in the 50s can end with wet snow once a strong cold front undercuts moist air, and roads that appear merely damp at sunset can glaze over quickly as temperatures drop below freezing. For emergency managers and transportation departments, probabilistic tools such as PWPF and WSSI offer a way to quantify those risks in advance, highlighting corridors and time frames where even a marginal snow or ice event could have outsized impacts because it follows a stretch of mild, complacency-inducing weather.

At the same time, the warm backdrop shaping this week’s storms hints at deeper questions about how the West and other snow-dependent regions will manage water in a climate where more winter precipitation falls as rain. Heavy storms still matter, but their value now depends on when they arrive, how cold the air is throughout the column, and how long the snowpack can survive between thaws. As this split-screen pattern plays out (from Sierra passes to Midwestern interstates and Carolina foothills) the challenge for forecasters, water managers, and the public is the same: use increasingly sophisticated tools to navigate a season that no longer follows the simple rules many people grew up expecting.

More from Morning Overview

*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.