The $500 billion price tag attached to Oracle and OpenAI’s next generation of AI data centers is forcing investors to confront a basic question: how much risk are they willing to shoulder to keep the AI boom going. What looked like a frictionless financing story is now colliding with loan fatigue, project delays, and growing doubts about whether even a $500 Billion valuation can justify this kind of capital burn.
Instead of treating AI infrastructure as a blank check, Wall Street is starting to price it like any other leveraged megaproject, with all the messy questions about execution, cash flow, and timing that implies.
The $500 billion bet behind Stargate
At the center of the anxiety is Stargate, the vast data center buildout Oracle is pursuing with OpenAI, which bankers say could ultimately require around $500 billion in capital. The vision is straightforward: build enough capacity to feed OpenAI’s most advanced models and lock in hyperscale cloud demand for years, turning Oracle into a central utility for generative AI. That ambition, however, depends on a financing machine that can repeatedly syndicate large tranches of debt into a market that is suddenly more cautious.
Two bankers and a financing executive familiar with the syndication market have described how the rising perception of risk around the Two companies’ project is starting to bite, with some lenders balking at the sheer scale of the commitments. Appetite for loans tied specifically to Oracle’s data center partnership with OpenAI has already diminished, according to reporting that describes how Appetite for loans has softened as investors reassess their exposure.
Delays, scaling back, and a funding model under fire
The financing wobble is not happening in a vacuum. Six months into the initiative, Stargate has struggled to launch at the promised pace, with Delays and Scaling already forcing Oracle to temper some of its early timelines. Reporting tied to Wall Street Journal account of the project notes that Stargate has faced setbacks that make the original rollout look increasingly optimistic, a red flag for lenders who rely on predictable construction and ramp schedules.
Those operational questions are feeding directly into concerns about Oracle’s balance sheet. Analysts have highlighted how the company’s aggressive AI expansion is raising leverage and stretching its funding model, with one breakdown from Simply Wall St pointing out that ORCL has come under pressure as investors digest the combination of high capital spending and legal scrutiny of AI debt disclosures. The same analysis flags tickers like ORCL and OPAI, as well as the private designation PVT, to underscore how closely markets are parsing the structure of these obligations.
Wall Street’s love–hate relationship with Oracle’s AI pivot
Investor reaction to Oracle’s AI push has been whiplash inducing. On one side, the stock has at times outperformed major benchmarks, with Zacks Equity Research noting that ORCL closed at $178.18, beating indices such as GSPC and DJI and delivering a gain of 45 percent over a comparable period. That kind of performance reflects genuine belief that Oracle’s cloud and AI strategy can unlock durable growth if the company executes.
On the other side, the same AI narrative has triggered sharp selloffs whenever the funding risks come into focus. A separate analysis of how ORCL is down 11.1 percent after an AI debt disclosure lawsuit, again tied to Simply Wall St, describes investors questioning whether the rich multiple and elevated leverage can be justified if loan markets keep tightening. Another report on Oracle’s costly AI expansion spells out how the mounting data center bill is weighing on sentiment, with Wall Street openly fretting that the company may be committing to more capacity than near term demand can absorb.
Loan fatigue and “Negative Sentiment” in the debt market
The clearest sign that enthusiasm is cooling comes from the loan market itself. Bankers involved in syndicating the debt tied to Stargate describe a marked drop in demand, with some investors simply unwilling to add more exposure to a single AI infrastructure story. One account of the process notes that Negative Sentiment has taken hold as Wall Street questions whether Oracle and Stargate can deliver the cash flows needed to service such a large stack of loans.
That skepticism is echoed in separate coverage of how Wall Street demand for debt linked to Oracle and Stargate has softened, with some funds trimming ORCL exposure rather than doubling down. The dynamic is straightforward: as the perceived risk of the project rises, the price Oracle must pay to borrow climbs, which in turn makes the economics of the entire AI buildout more fragile.
OpenAI’s $500 Billion valuation meets bubble fears
All of this is happening against the backdrop of OpenAI’s own sky high valuation. Microsoft and OpenAI struck a deal that valued the startup at $500 billion, a figure that instantly made it one of the most richly priced private technology companies on record. That valuation was reinforced by other coverage of OpenAI’s trajectory, including analysis that described how the company reached a valuation of $500 and framed OpenAI’s $500 Billion status as facing a potential Billion Valuation Faces if growth expectations reset.
Even insiders are starting to sound cautious. OpenAI chair Bret Taylor has said AI is “probably” a bubble and predicted a correction in the coming years, a striking admission from one of the sector’s most prominent executives. When the person helping steer a $500 Billion company is warning about froth, it is not surprising that lenders financing the associated infrastructure are starting to demand a higher margin of safety.
More from Morning Overview