For the first time, scientists say genetic material on a Renaissance drawing may come from Leonardo da Vinci himself, preserved in the paper fibers for roughly half a millennium. If confirmed, the 500-year-old biological traces would turn a single sheet of red chalk into a bridge between art history and modern genomics, and open a new way to study the life and health of one of history’s most studied figures.
The claim rests on a disputed work, a red chalk image known as the Holy Child, and on a new forensic toolkit that treats artworks as biological time capsules. I want to unpack what researchers actually found, how they are trying to link it to Leonardo da Vinci, and why the evidence is both tantalizing and far from definitive.
The Holy Child drawing and a 500-year-old biological time capsule
The focus of the new research is a red chalk drawing called the Holy Child, a work that some specialists have long argued was created in Leonardo da Vinci’s circle and possibly by the master himself. The sheet is roughly 500 years old, and investigators describe it as a fragile but remarkably well preserved artifact that has passed through collectors’ hands since the Renaissance. Reports on the project say that an international team of Scientists carefully swabbed the surface and extracted what they describe as trace DNA embedded in the paper and pigment, treating the drawing as a kind of archaeological site in miniature rather than a simple image on a page.
Several accounts emphasize that the Holy Child is a 500-Year-Old Disputed Drawing May Preserve Genetic Material Linked to Renaissance Artist, which is why it was chosen as a test case for this work. One report notes that Scientists Recover Leonardo Da Vinci’s DNA From 500-Year-Old Drawing, describing how the Old Drawing yielded not only human DNA but also an environmental fingerprint of microbes and plant traces that match what would be expected from Renaissance workshops. Another summary of the same effort stresses that Leonardo da Vinci’s DNA Discovered? 500-Year-Old Disputed Drawing May Preserve Genetic Material Linked to Renaissance Artist, underscoring that the age of the sheet and its contested attribution make it an ideal candidate for this kind of forensic scrutiny.
How researchers say they pulled DNA from Renaissance art
The technical leap here is the idea that centuries-old artworks can still carry recoverable genetic material, and that this material can be separated from the contamination of later handlers. According to descriptions of the project, an international team of Scientists collected microscopic biological residues from the Holy Child and other artifacts, then used modern sequencing tools to isolate tiny amounts of DNA. One account explains that from these biological materials they extracted tiny amounts of DNA, which provided useful information about the artefacts, and that the unique presence of Citrus signatures and other environmental markers helped distinguish original workshop residues from modern handling, a point the researchers highlighted as Certa evidence that the samples were not purely contemporary contamination.
In a related overview, Their current findings are described as not definitive proof, but as an early demonstration of a technique sometimes called arteomics, which uses genetic and microbial traces to study artworks rather than relying only on expert opinion. Another report notes that a team of researchers from the Leonardo da Vinci DNA Project analyzed samples swabbed from a red chalk drawing possibly attributed to Leonardo, using methods originally developed for ancient bones and archaeological remains to read DNA left behind by an artist. Together, these accounts sketch a picture of a lab workflow that treats the Holy Child like a fossil or a mummy, with the goal of reconstructing both the human and environmental DNA that settled on the sheet when it was new.
Linking the genetic traces to Leonardo da Vinci himself
Recovering old DNA from a drawing is only the first step; the more ambitious claim is that some of that genetic material may come from Leonardo da Vinci. Investigators involved in the project say they may have traced Leonardo da Vinci’s DNA by comparing the sequences found on the Holy Child to genetic material from other sources connected to the artist. One report describes how Investigators are now comparing this living DNA to bone fragments excavated from a Da Vinci family tomb in Vinci, Italy, where Leonardo’s relatives are believed to be buried, in an effort to identify a shared Y-chromosomal signal that would tie the drawing’s human DNA to his paternal line.
Another account explains that Excavating da Vinci’s Family While lab teams swabbed artworks, other LDVP researchers went underground, literally, to recover remains from family graves as part of the same Leonardo da Vinci DNA Project. The idea is that if the Holy Child carries a male genetic profile that matches the Y chromosome found in bones from Vinci, Italy, and that profile is distinct from modern handlers, then the simplest explanation would be that the DNA belongs to Leonardo da Vinci himself. A separate summary of the work notes that an international research team reports it may have recovered genetic traces linked to Leonardo da Vinci from a Renaissance drawing, framing the result as a strong but still circumstantial link between the artist and the biological material left behind on artifacts.
What the early results actually show, and what they do not
So far, the scientists involved have been careful to say that the evidence is suggestive rather than conclusive. One overview of the project notes that Scientists say they may have extracted Leonardo da Vinci’s DNA from a Renaissance-era drawing for the very first time, stressing the word “may” and emphasizing that the trace DNA is degraded and mixed with material from other people who handled the sheet over centuries. Another report on the same work describes how an international team of researchers says it may have recovered genetic material linked to Leonardo da Vinci from a Renaissance drawing, again presenting the result as a promising lead rather than a solved mystery.
Other summaries echo that caution. One account explains that Their current findings are not definitive proof, but could demonstrate the promise of a technique that uses genetic and microbial signatures to authenticate artworks rather than relying solely on stylistic judgment. Another notes that Da Vinci’s Genetic Secrets May Soon Be Revealed by an Ambitious DNA Project, but that the researchers still need to show a clear match between the Holy Child DNA and the sequences from the Da Vinci family tomb before they can claim to have Leonardo’s genome in hand. In that sense, the project sits at an intermediate stage: more advanced than speculation, because there are real sequences and comparative data, but not yet at the level where a forensic scientist would testify that the DNA must come from Leonardo da Vinci and no one else.
A new kind of art history, and the questions it raises
Even with those caveats, the implications of this work are striking. Experts say they have recovered genetic material from centuries-old artwork, a groundbreaking step that could allow future scholars to study not only who made a piece but also what kinds of plants, microbes, and workshop materials surrounded it at the time of creation. One summary notes that Researchers say they have recovered genetic material from centuries-old artwork and are now comparing this living DNA to bone fragments from Vinci, Italy, in hopes of linking it to Leonardo da Vinci and perhaps even to his extraordinary cognitive abilities, a reminder that some scientists hope to use the genome to probe the biological roots of his talents as well as his ancestry.
At the same time, the project raises ethical and practical questions that art historians and geneticists will need to confront together. If Da Vinci’s DNA is potentially in the hands of scientists, as one report puts it, then decisions about sequencing, publishing, and interpreting that genome will shape how future generations understand both the man and his work. Another account of the same effort notes that Scientists recover DNA from Leonardo da Vinci drawing and that experts are already debating how far to push the analysis, from health inferences to speculative links between genes and creativity. For now, the Holy Child and its 500-year-old traces of DNA sit at the center of that debate, a single sheet of red chalk that could turn out to be the closest thing we have to a biological portrait of Leonardo da Vinci.
More from Morning Overview