The first serious price whispers around Apple’s long‑rumored foldable iPhone are not shy. Analysts and leakers are now circling figures between roughly $2,000 and $2,500, with one widely cited forecast landing at about $2,399. That would put a so‑called iPhone Fold in the same financial league as a high‑end MacBook, raising a blunt question: who, exactly, is this ultra‑premium experiment really for?
On paper, the pitch is seductive: a pocketable device that opens into a small tablet, potentially with a crease‑free 7.8‑inch display, a huge battery, and an under‑display camera that hides when you do not need it. In practice, a $2,500 price tag would test even Apple’s famously loyal base, especially at a time when many people are stretching their phones for four or five years. I want to unpack which buyers might still line up, and which ones will watch from the sidelines until the price, and the technology, come back down to earth.
The price rumor: from $1,800 to a $2,399 “sweet spot”
The first thing to understand is that the $2,500 figure is not a wild outlier. Reporting on the foldable iPhone has consistently framed it as Apple’s most expensive phone yet, with estimates ranging from as low as $1,800 to as high as $2,500 depending on configuration and component costs. One analyst, identified as Specifically Liao in recent coverage, has argued that a price of $2,399 is what Apple would need to cover expensive materials and still hit its usual hardware margins. That number has quickly become the shorthand for how much this device might cost at launch.
Separate analysis of Apple’s broader foldable strategy suggests the company is comfortable positioning the device between $2,000 and $2,500, explicitly above the current crop of Android foldables like the Samsung Z Fold 7 and Pixel Fold. That would make the iPhone Fold less a mass‑market flagship and more a halo product, priced closer to a 16‑inch MacBook Pro than to the mainstream iPhone range that typically runs between $700 and $2,000. In other words, the sticker shock is not a bug of the strategy, it is the strategy.
What Apple is actually building: crease‑free, big battery, big screen
Price only makes sense in the context of what Apple is trying to sell, and the rumor mill paints a picture of a device that is meant to feel like a small iPad when opened. One influential report from Kuo has pointed to a 7.8-inch crease‑free inner display, which would be a direct shot at the visible folds that still plague many rival devices. Another detailed rundown of the project has highlighted a battery in the 5,400 to 5,800 mAh range, which would make it the largest battery ever shipped in an iPhone and a necessity if Apple wants the device to double as a productivity machine.
Other rumors focus on the front of the device, where Apple is said to be working on an under‑display camera that hides beneath the screen. One leak describes an “industry‑first 24MP” sensor tucked under the panel, with some observers arguing that Apple still needs a mainstream device to make bank rather than a niche low‑quantity one. The same rumor cycle has also emphasized that the foldable iPhone is expected to be creaseless and expensive, with one discussion thread bluntly summarizing that an iPhone with a creaseless fold will not be cheap and that There is a good chance it will sit above the current $700 to $2,000 iPhone range.
Why Apple can charge laptop money for a phone
Apple has a long history of using price to signal that a product is not for everyone, at least not at first. The first iPhone, the original iPad Pro, and the early MacBook Pro with Retina displays all launched at premiums that looked aggressive in the moment but helped define new categories. In the case of the iPhone Fold, the company appears to be betting that a subset of buyers will accept a $2,399 price if they believe they are getting a phone, an iPad mini, and perhaps even a light laptop replacement in one device. One analysis of the foldable project explicitly frames it as likely to be Apple’s most expensive phone yet, precisely because it is meant to sit above the rest of the lineup.
There is also a cold financial logic at work. A detailed breakdown of the rumored bill of materials suggests that the foldable device will need to hit $2,399 to cover the cost of the flexible OLED panel, the complex hinge, the large battery, and the under‑display camera while still delivering Apple’s typical margin. Another forecast that looks at how demand might play out does not assume mass‑market adoption at that price, instead projecting a 7 percent penetration rate and about 15 million units in the first year, a figure that is framed under the heading “How demand might play out.” In other words, Apple does not need everyone to buy this device for it to be a financial success.
Who actually buys $2,000‑plus phones today
To understand who might buy a $2,500 iPhone Fold, it helps to look at who is already buying ultra‑premium phones. The foldable smartphone market is still relatively small but growing, and research into the segment notes that it is benefiting from strong carrier partnerships that make these devices more accessible through financing and trade‑in deals. One industry report points out that The market is also benefiting from aggressive installment plans and subsidies that spread the cost over years, which is exactly how many buyers justify spending four figures on a phone.
In the United States, those financing structures are already in place for Apple’s existing lineup. One widely shared explanation from a carrier customer notes that In the US, the major carriers offer 24 or 36 m month no‑interest installment plans for new devices, which turns a $1,200 iPhone into a roughly $33 to $50 monthly line item. Apply the same math to a $2,399 foldable and you are looking at something closer to $70 to $100 a month, still steep but psychologically easier to swallow than a single $2,500 hit. That is the core of Apple’s bet: that enough high‑income, upgrade‑happy customers will see the monthly number, not the total.
The early‑adopter crowd: enthusiasts, creators, and status buyers
At launch, the iPhone Fold is likely to be a niche device, and that is by design. The most obvious buyers are the same people who already line up for Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold series: tech enthusiasts who want to live on the bleeding edge, mobile creators who see value in a larger canvas for editing video or photos on the go, and status‑conscious consumers who treat their phone as a fashion accessory. One detailed rumor roundup, framed as “This Is What the Fold Will Be Like | ALL Rumors,” leans heavily into that aspirational angle, describing a device that is meant to feel futuristic in the hand and on the desk.
There is also a subset of buyers who simply want the most expensive iPhone because it is the most expensive iPhone. For them, the combination of a creaseless display, an “industry‑first 24MP” under‑display camera, and a huge battery will be less important than the social signal of owning the top‑of‑the‑line model. One Reddit thread that picked up the claim that the iPhone Fold will be creaseless and cost $2,400 is full of comments that start with “Yeah, if they manage it, great. But Samsung makes iPhone screens,” a reminder that even enthusiasts are aware of the trade‑offs. Still, this is the group most likely to shrug at a $2,399 price and treat it as the cost of being first.
The skeptics: “It is to push you into services”
Not everyone in Apple’s orbit is convinced that a $2,400 foldable is a good idea, or even that it is primarily about hardware. One widely shared reaction to the rumored $2,399 foldable iPhone price argues that “It’s to push customers to pay for the subscription cloud services they make huge margins on and is 40% of their profit,” suggesting that the real play is to nudge high‑spending users deeper into iCloud, Apple Music, Apple TV Plus, and other recurring revenue streams. In that view, the iPhone Fold is less a standalone product and more a very expensive funnel into Apple’s services ecosystem.
There is also a more practical skepticism: that a foldable iPhone at this price will be too fragile and too compromised to replace both a phone and a tablet. Some commenters point out that “But Samsung makes iPhone screens” and has struggled with durability in its own foldables, raising questions about whether Apple can really deliver a creaseless, long‑lasting panel on its first try. Others worry that the hinge, the under‑display camera, and the large battery will all be first‑generation components that could be outclassed within a year or two, making a $2,500 investment feel risky. For these buyers, the rational move is to wait for a second or third generation, when the price may soften and the hardware will almost certainly improve.
Can it replace your iPad or laptop, or is it just another screen?
One of the strongest arguments in favor of a very expensive foldable iPhone is that it could consolidate devices. If a 7.8‑inch, crease‑free display really can deliver a tablet‑like experience, and if the rumored 5,400 to 5,800 mAh battery can keep up with heavy multitasking, then the iPhone Fold might plausibly replace an iPhone plus an iPad mini for some users. A detailed analysis of the category explicitly asks whether Apple’s new foldable could replace your iPad and laptop, noting that the device is likely to be priced between $2,000 and $2,500 and positioning it as a potential rival to both tablets and lightweight notebooks.
In practice, though, replacing a laptop is a high bar. Even if the iPhone Fold ships with a large inner display and a big battery, it will still run iOS, not macOS, and will still rely on touch and accessory keyboards rather than a built‑in trackpad and full desktop apps. For many professionals, that means it might replace an iPad but not a MacBook, which weakens the economic case for spending $2,399. The more the device looks like “just another screen” rather than a true consolidation of roles, the smaller the pool of rational buyers becomes.
How Apple might soften the blow: trade‑ins, bundles, and positioning
Even if the list price lands at $2,399 or higher, Apple has plenty of levers to make the iPhone Fold feel more attainable. Generous trade‑in values for recent Pro‑series iPhones, aggressive carrier promotions, and installment plans that stretch to 36 months can all shrink the apparent cost. The same market research that highlights strong carrier partnerships in the foldable segment notes that The market is also benefiting from financing that spreads payments out, and Apple has already shown with the iPhone Upgrade Program that it is comfortable turning hardware into a subscription‑like expense.
There is also the question of how the device is framed. If Apple positions the iPhone Fold as a kind of “iPhone Ultra,” a limited‑run showcase of its best display and camera technology, then a $2,500 price becomes part of the story rather than a liability. The company has done similar things in other categories, from the Pro Display XDR to the highest‑end Apple Watch models. In that context, the iPhone Fold would sit alongside other premium product lines that are aspirational rather than essential, which is a role Apple knows how to manage.
The long game: from halo gadget to mainstream option
Even if the first iPhone Fold is a niche device, history suggests that Apple is playing a longer game. Early adopters will effectively subsidize the research and development of foldable displays, hinges, and under‑display cameras, allowing Apple to refine the technology and eventually bring it down into more affordable models. The rumor pipeline already hints at multiple foldable form factors, including a clamshell design and a larger tablet‑style device, which could eventually sit at different price points. One comprehensive guide to the project notes that the foldable iPhone could have the largest battery capacity ever in an iPhone and tracks a long Rumor History of prototypes and design shifts, which is exactly how Apple tends to incubate new product lines.
In the meantime, the company will continue to sell a wide range of more conventional iPhones, from the base models up through the Pro Max, at prices that cover the $700 to $2,000 band. That gives Apple room to experiment at the top without alienating its core audience. For buyers, the calculus is simple: if you are the kind of person who already spends laptop money on a phone, the iPhone Fold will be a tempting new option, especially if it can genuinely replace a second device. If you are not, the smartest move may be to watch the first generation from afar, let the early adopters shake out the bugs, and wait for the day when a foldable iPhone feels less like a $2,500 curiosity and more like a natural upgrade from the slab in your pocket. Along the way, Apple will keep refining the hardware, the software, and the pitch, just as it has with every other ambitious product it has launched before.
More from MorningOverview